Cargando…
Pain Assessment Using the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
The analgesia nociception index (ANI) has emerged as a potential measurement for objective pain assessment during general anesthesia. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of ANI in assessing intra- and post-operative pain in patients undergoing ge...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888072 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13101461 |
_version_ | 1785127733107359744 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Min Kyoung Choi, Geun Joo Oh, Kyung Seo Lee, Sang Phil Kang, Hyun |
author_facet | Kim, Min Kyoung Choi, Geun Joo Oh, Kyung Seo Lee, Sang Phil Kang, Hyun |
author_sort | Kim, Min Kyoung |
collection | PubMed |
description | The analgesia nociception index (ANI) has emerged as a potential measurement for objective pain assessment during general anesthesia. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of ANI in assessing intra- and post-operative pain in patients undergoing general anesthesia. We conducted a comprehensive search of Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, public clinical trial databases (ClinicalTrials and Clinical Research Information Service), and OpenSIGLE to identify relevant studies published prior to May 2023 and included studies that evaluated the accuracy and effectiveness of ANI for intra- or post-operative pain assessment during general anesthesia. Among the 962 studies identified, 30 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review, and 17 were included in the meta-analysis. For predicting intra-operative pain, pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under curve of ANI were 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79–0.83; I(2) = 68.2%), 0.93 (95% CI = 0.92–0.93; I(2) = 99.8%), 2.32 (95% CI = 1.33–3.30; I(2) = 61.7%), and 0.77 (95% CI = 0.76–0.78; I(2) = 87.4%), respectively. ANI values and changes in intra-operative hemodynamic variables showed statistically significant correlations. For predicting post-operative pain, pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of ANI were 0.90 (95% CI = 0.87–0.93; I(2) = 58.7%), 0.51 (95% CI = 0.49–0.52; I(2) = 99.9%), and 3.38 (95% CI = 2.87–3.88; I(2) = 81.2%), respectively. ANI monitoring in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia is a valuable measurement for predicting intra- and post-operative pain. It reduces the use of intra-operative opioids and aids in pain management throughout the perioperative period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10608238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106082382023-10-28 Pain Assessment Using the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Kim, Min Kyoung Choi, Geun Joo Oh, Kyung Seo Lee, Sang Phil Kang, Hyun J Pers Med Systematic Review The analgesia nociception index (ANI) has emerged as a potential measurement for objective pain assessment during general anesthesia. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of ANI in assessing intra- and post-operative pain in patients undergoing general anesthesia. We conducted a comprehensive search of Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, public clinical trial databases (ClinicalTrials and Clinical Research Information Service), and OpenSIGLE to identify relevant studies published prior to May 2023 and included studies that evaluated the accuracy and effectiveness of ANI for intra- or post-operative pain assessment during general anesthesia. Among the 962 studies identified, 30 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review, and 17 were included in the meta-analysis. For predicting intra-operative pain, pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under curve of ANI were 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79–0.83; I(2) = 68.2%), 0.93 (95% CI = 0.92–0.93; I(2) = 99.8%), 2.32 (95% CI = 1.33–3.30; I(2) = 61.7%), and 0.77 (95% CI = 0.76–0.78; I(2) = 87.4%), respectively. ANI values and changes in intra-operative hemodynamic variables showed statistically significant correlations. For predicting post-operative pain, pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of ANI were 0.90 (95% CI = 0.87–0.93; I(2) = 58.7%), 0.51 (95% CI = 0.49–0.52; I(2) = 99.9%), and 3.38 (95% CI = 2.87–3.88; I(2) = 81.2%), respectively. ANI monitoring in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia is a valuable measurement for predicting intra- and post-operative pain. It reduces the use of intra-operative opioids and aids in pain management throughout the perioperative period. MDPI 2023-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10608238/ /pubmed/37888072 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13101461 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Kim, Min Kyoung Choi, Geun Joo Oh, Kyung Seo Lee, Sang Phil Kang, Hyun Pain Assessment Using the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Pain Assessment Using the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Pain Assessment Using the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Pain Assessment Using the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Pain Assessment Using the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Pain Assessment Using the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | pain assessment using the analgesia nociception index (ani) in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888072 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13101461 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimminkyoung painassessmentusingtheanalgesianociceptionindexaniinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT choigeunjoo painassessmentusingtheanalgesianociceptionindexaniinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ohkyungseo painassessmentusingtheanalgesianociceptionindexaniinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leesangphil painassessmentusingtheanalgesianociceptionindexaniinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kanghyun painassessmentusingtheanalgesianociceptionindexaniinpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |