Cargando…

Interdental Bone Level around Immediately Placed Implants at Maxillary and Mandibular Molar Sites: A Retrospective Radiographic Analysis

Background and Objectives: The current study aimed to compare the amount of interdental bone loss between early and immediate implant placements. Materials and Methods: A total of 16 immediate implants and 16 early implants radiographs were included in the current research. The bone level was assess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alasqah, Mohammed, Alzahrani, Khalid S., Gufran, Khalid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101701
_version_ 1785127734028009472
author Alasqah, Mohammed
Alzahrani, Khalid S.
Gufran, Khalid
author_facet Alasqah, Mohammed
Alzahrani, Khalid S.
Gufran, Khalid
author_sort Alasqah, Mohammed
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: The current study aimed to compare the amount of interdental bone loss between early and immediate implant placements. Materials and Methods: A total of 16 immediate implants and 16 early implants radiographs were included in the current research. The bone level was assessed at two different stages: at the extraction appointment (T1) and after three to six months of implant placement (T2). A line was drawn from the cemento-enamel junction connecting adjacent teeth to the interdental line connecting the interdental alveolar crest at both stages. The difference between measurements in the T1 and T2 stages is the bone loss measurement for the early implant group. For the immediate implant placement sites, the measurements were taken from the interdental bone crest to the implant platform level. Results: A Mann–Whitney U test was performed to evaluate the differences between both groups. The descriptive statistics of the T1 and T2 stages for both groups suggest that the bone loss in the T2 stage was generally higher than T1 stage. The immediate implant group showed higher bone loss compared to the early implant group. Moreover, there was significantly higher bone loss (p = 0.039) in the immediate implant group compared to the early implant group. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that immediate implant might have disadvantages over early implant in terms of bone loss after the extraction of maxillary and mandibular molar teeth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10608242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106082422023-10-28 Interdental Bone Level around Immediately Placed Implants at Maxillary and Mandibular Molar Sites: A Retrospective Radiographic Analysis Alasqah, Mohammed Alzahrani, Khalid S. Gufran, Khalid Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: The current study aimed to compare the amount of interdental bone loss between early and immediate implant placements. Materials and Methods: A total of 16 immediate implants and 16 early implants radiographs were included in the current research. The bone level was assessed at two different stages: at the extraction appointment (T1) and after three to six months of implant placement (T2). A line was drawn from the cemento-enamel junction connecting adjacent teeth to the interdental line connecting the interdental alveolar crest at both stages. The difference between measurements in the T1 and T2 stages is the bone loss measurement for the early implant group. For the immediate implant placement sites, the measurements were taken from the interdental bone crest to the implant platform level. Results: A Mann–Whitney U test was performed to evaluate the differences between both groups. The descriptive statistics of the T1 and T2 stages for both groups suggest that the bone loss in the T2 stage was generally higher than T1 stage. The immediate implant group showed higher bone loss compared to the early implant group. Moreover, there was significantly higher bone loss (p = 0.039) in the immediate implant group compared to the early implant group. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that immediate implant might have disadvantages over early implant in terms of bone loss after the extraction of maxillary and mandibular molar teeth. MDPI 2023-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10608242/ /pubmed/37893419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101701 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Alasqah, Mohammed
Alzahrani, Khalid S.
Gufran, Khalid
Interdental Bone Level around Immediately Placed Implants at Maxillary and Mandibular Molar Sites: A Retrospective Radiographic Analysis
title Interdental Bone Level around Immediately Placed Implants at Maxillary and Mandibular Molar Sites: A Retrospective Radiographic Analysis
title_full Interdental Bone Level around Immediately Placed Implants at Maxillary and Mandibular Molar Sites: A Retrospective Radiographic Analysis
title_fullStr Interdental Bone Level around Immediately Placed Implants at Maxillary and Mandibular Molar Sites: A Retrospective Radiographic Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Interdental Bone Level around Immediately Placed Implants at Maxillary and Mandibular Molar Sites: A Retrospective Radiographic Analysis
title_short Interdental Bone Level around Immediately Placed Implants at Maxillary and Mandibular Molar Sites: A Retrospective Radiographic Analysis
title_sort interdental bone level around immediately placed implants at maxillary and mandibular molar sites: a retrospective radiographic analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101701
work_keys_str_mv AT alasqahmohammed interdentalbonelevelaroundimmediatelyplacedimplantsatmaxillaryandmandibularmolarsitesaretrospectiveradiographicanalysis
AT alzahranikhalids interdentalbonelevelaroundimmediatelyplacedimplantsatmaxillaryandmandibularmolarsitesaretrospectiveradiographicanalysis
AT gufrankhalid interdentalbonelevelaroundimmediatelyplacedimplantsatmaxillaryandmandibularmolarsitesaretrospectiveradiographicanalysis