Cargando…

A Comparative Study of Nafion 212 and Sulfonated Poly(Ether Ether Ketone) Membranes with Different Degrees of Sulfonation on the Performance of Iron-Chromium Redox Flow Battery

For an iron-chromium redox flow battery (ICRFB), sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK) membranes with five various degrees of sulfonation (DSs) are studied. To select the SPEEK membrane with the ideal DS for ICRFB applications, the physicochemical characteristics and single-cell performance ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bai, Enrui, Zhu, Haotian, Sun, Chuanyu, Liu, Guanchen, Xie, Xiaoyin, Xu, Chongyang, Wu, Sheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13100820
_version_ 1785127740202024960
author Bai, Enrui
Zhu, Haotian
Sun, Chuanyu
Liu, Guanchen
Xie, Xiaoyin
Xu, Chongyang
Wu, Sheng
author_facet Bai, Enrui
Zhu, Haotian
Sun, Chuanyu
Liu, Guanchen
Xie, Xiaoyin
Xu, Chongyang
Wu, Sheng
author_sort Bai, Enrui
collection PubMed
description For an iron-chromium redox flow battery (ICRFB), sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK) membranes with five various degrees of sulfonation (DSs) are studied. To select the SPEEK membrane with the ideal DS for ICRFB applications, the physicochemical characteristics and single-cell performance are taken into consideration. Following all the investigations, it has been determined that the SPEEK membrane, which has a DS of 57% and a thin thickness of 25 μm, is the best option for replacing commercial Nafion 212 in ICRFB. Firstly, it exhibits a better cell performance according to energy efficiency (EE) and coulombic efficiency (CE) at the current density range between 40 mA cm(−2) and 80 mA cm(−2). Additionally, it has a more stable EE (79.25–81.64%) and lower discharge capacity decay rate (50%) than the Nafion 212 (EE: 76.74–81.45%, discharge capacity decay: 76%) after 50 charge–discharge cycles, which proves its better oxidation stability as well. In addition, the longer self-discharge time during the open-circuit voltage test further demonstrates that this SPEEK membrane could be employed for large-scale ICRFB applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10608269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106082692023-10-28 A Comparative Study of Nafion 212 and Sulfonated Poly(Ether Ether Ketone) Membranes with Different Degrees of Sulfonation on the Performance of Iron-Chromium Redox Flow Battery Bai, Enrui Zhu, Haotian Sun, Chuanyu Liu, Guanchen Xie, Xiaoyin Xu, Chongyang Wu, Sheng Membranes (Basel) Article For an iron-chromium redox flow battery (ICRFB), sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK) membranes with five various degrees of sulfonation (DSs) are studied. To select the SPEEK membrane with the ideal DS for ICRFB applications, the physicochemical characteristics and single-cell performance are taken into consideration. Following all the investigations, it has been determined that the SPEEK membrane, which has a DS of 57% and a thin thickness of 25 μm, is the best option for replacing commercial Nafion 212 in ICRFB. Firstly, it exhibits a better cell performance according to energy efficiency (EE) and coulombic efficiency (CE) at the current density range between 40 mA cm(−2) and 80 mA cm(−2). Additionally, it has a more stable EE (79.25–81.64%) and lower discharge capacity decay rate (50%) than the Nafion 212 (EE: 76.74–81.45%, discharge capacity decay: 76%) after 50 charge–discharge cycles, which proves its better oxidation stability as well. In addition, the longer self-discharge time during the open-circuit voltage test further demonstrates that this SPEEK membrane could be employed for large-scale ICRFB applications. MDPI 2023-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10608269/ /pubmed/37887992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13100820 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bai, Enrui
Zhu, Haotian
Sun, Chuanyu
Liu, Guanchen
Xie, Xiaoyin
Xu, Chongyang
Wu, Sheng
A Comparative Study of Nafion 212 and Sulfonated Poly(Ether Ether Ketone) Membranes with Different Degrees of Sulfonation on the Performance of Iron-Chromium Redox Flow Battery
title A Comparative Study of Nafion 212 and Sulfonated Poly(Ether Ether Ketone) Membranes with Different Degrees of Sulfonation on the Performance of Iron-Chromium Redox Flow Battery
title_full A Comparative Study of Nafion 212 and Sulfonated Poly(Ether Ether Ketone) Membranes with Different Degrees of Sulfonation on the Performance of Iron-Chromium Redox Flow Battery
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Nafion 212 and Sulfonated Poly(Ether Ether Ketone) Membranes with Different Degrees of Sulfonation on the Performance of Iron-Chromium Redox Flow Battery
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Nafion 212 and Sulfonated Poly(Ether Ether Ketone) Membranes with Different Degrees of Sulfonation on the Performance of Iron-Chromium Redox Flow Battery
title_short A Comparative Study of Nafion 212 and Sulfonated Poly(Ether Ether Ketone) Membranes with Different Degrees of Sulfonation on the Performance of Iron-Chromium Redox Flow Battery
title_sort comparative study of nafion 212 and sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) membranes with different degrees of sulfonation on the performance of iron-chromium redox flow battery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13100820
work_keys_str_mv AT baienrui acomparativestudyofnafion212andsulfonatedpolyetheretherketonemembraneswithdifferentdegreesofsulfonationontheperformanceofironchromiumredoxflowbattery
AT zhuhaotian acomparativestudyofnafion212andsulfonatedpolyetheretherketonemembraneswithdifferentdegreesofsulfonationontheperformanceofironchromiumredoxflowbattery
AT sunchuanyu acomparativestudyofnafion212andsulfonatedpolyetheretherketonemembraneswithdifferentdegreesofsulfonationontheperformanceofironchromiumredoxflowbattery
AT liuguanchen acomparativestudyofnafion212andsulfonatedpolyetheretherketonemembraneswithdifferentdegreesofsulfonationontheperformanceofironchromiumredoxflowbattery
AT xiexiaoyin acomparativestudyofnafion212andsulfonatedpolyetheretherketonemembraneswithdifferentdegreesofsulfonationontheperformanceofironchromiumredoxflowbattery
AT xuchongyang acomparativestudyofnafion212andsulfonatedpolyetheretherketonemembraneswithdifferentdegreesofsulfonationontheperformanceofironchromiumredoxflowbattery
AT wusheng acomparativestudyofnafion212andsulfonatedpolyetheretherketonemembraneswithdifferentdegreesofsulfonationontheperformanceofironchromiumredoxflowbattery
AT baienrui comparativestudyofnafion212andsulfonatedpolyetheretherketonemembraneswithdifferentdegreesofsulfonationontheperformanceofironchromiumredoxflowbattery
AT zhuhaotian comparativestudyofnafion212andsulfonatedpolyetheretherketonemembraneswithdifferentdegreesofsulfonationontheperformanceofironchromiumredoxflowbattery
AT sunchuanyu comparativestudyofnafion212andsulfonatedpolyetheretherketonemembraneswithdifferentdegreesofsulfonationontheperformanceofironchromiumredoxflowbattery
AT liuguanchen comparativestudyofnafion212andsulfonatedpolyetheretherketonemembraneswithdifferentdegreesofsulfonationontheperformanceofironchromiumredoxflowbattery
AT xiexiaoyin comparativestudyofnafion212andsulfonatedpolyetheretherketonemembraneswithdifferentdegreesofsulfonationontheperformanceofironchromiumredoxflowbattery
AT xuchongyang comparativestudyofnafion212andsulfonatedpolyetheretherketonemembraneswithdifferentdegreesofsulfonationontheperformanceofironchromiumredoxflowbattery
AT wusheng comparativestudyofnafion212andsulfonatedpolyetheretherketonemembraneswithdifferentdegreesofsulfonationontheperformanceofironchromiumredoxflowbattery