Cargando…

Dynamic Quantitative Imaging of the Masseter Muscles in Bruxism Patients with Myofascial Pain: Could It Be an Objective Biomarker?

We aimed to investigate whether the collaboration of shear wave elastosonography (SWE) and B-mode ultrasonography (US) could be offered as diagnostic tools to assess the presence, severity, and progress of bruxism, as well as a biomarker for the effectiveness of treatment in daily clinical practice....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aydin Aksu, Sibel, Kursoglu, Pinar, Turker, Izim, Baskak, Fulya, Ozen Sutuven, Elifnaz, Meric, Kaan, Cabbar, Fatih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888078
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13101467
_version_ 1785127757088292864
author Aydin Aksu, Sibel
Kursoglu, Pinar
Turker, Izim
Baskak, Fulya
Ozen Sutuven, Elifnaz
Meric, Kaan
Cabbar, Fatih
author_facet Aydin Aksu, Sibel
Kursoglu, Pinar
Turker, Izim
Baskak, Fulya
Ozen Sutuven, Elifnaz
Meric, Kaan
Cabbar, Fatih
author_sort Aydin Aksu, Sibel
collection PubMed
description We aimed to investigate whether the collaboration of shear wave elastosonography (SWE) and B-mode ultrasonography (US) could be offered as diagnostic tools to assess the presence, severity, and progress of bruxism, as well as a biomarker for the effectiveness of treatment in daily clinical practice. The study was designed as a quantitative evaluation of the masseter muscles (MMs) of the clinically diagnosed bruxism patients suffering from myofascial pain and MMs of the healthy individuals. Clinical examinations were made according to the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD), and pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Painful MMs with VAS scores ≥ 4 were assigned to Group A, and healthy MMs were assigned to Group B. Also, the MMs of the painful bruxers were analyzed based on wearing occlusal splints. Group A was divided into two subgroups as splint users (Group AI) and non-users (Group AII). All the participants were scanned with dynamic US and SWE to quantify the size and stiffness of the MMs. Measurements of each muscle pair while the jaw is in a resting position (relaxation) and clenching position (contraction) were recorded. The significant differences in stiffness and thickness became visible in the relaxation state. Bruxism patients with myofascial pain had significantly harder and thinner MMs than healthy individuals. During the relaxation, the mean thickness and elasticity values were 9.17 ± 0.40 mm and 39.13 ± 4.52 kPa for Group A and 10.38 ± 0.27 and 27.73 ± 1.92 for Group B, respectively. Also, stiffer MMs were measured in Group AII (38.16 ± 3.61 kPa) than in Group AI (26.91 ± 2.13 kPa). In conclusion, the combination of SWE and US using a dynamic examination technique has the potential to be a valuable tool for the management of bruxism patients suffering from myofascial pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10608340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106083402023-10-28 Dynamic Quantitative Imaging of the Masseter Muscles in Bruxism Patients with Myofascial Pain: Could It Be an Objective Biomarker? Aydin Aksu, Sibel Kursoglu, Pinar Turker, Izim Baskak, Fulya Ozen Sutuven, Elifnaz Meric, Kaan Cabbar, Fatih J Pers Med Article We aimed to investigate whether the collaboration of shear wave elastosonography (SWE) and B-mode ultrasonography (US) could be offered as diagnostic tools to assess the presence, severity, and progress of bruxism, as well as a biomarker for the effectiveness of treatment in daily clinical practice. The study was designed as a quantitative evaluation of the masseter muscles (MMs) of the clinically diagnosed bruxism patients suffering from myofascial pain and MMs of the healthy individuals. Clinical examinations were made according to the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD), and pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Painful MMs with VAS scores ≥ 4 were assigned to Group A, and healthy MMs were assigned to Group B. Also, the MMs of the painful bruxers were analyzed based on wearing occlusal splints. Group A was divided into two subgroups as splint users (Group AI) and non-users (Group AII). All the participants were scanned with dynamic US and SWE to quantify the size and stiffness of the MMs. Measurements of each muscle pair while the jaw is in a resting position (relaxation) and clenching position (contraction) were recorded. The significant differences in stiffness and thickness became visible in the relaxation state. Bruxism patients with myofascial pain had significantly harder and thinner MMs than healthy individuals. During the relaxation, the mean thickness and elasticity values were 9.17 ± 0.40 mm and 39.13 ± 4.52 kPa for Group A and 10.38 ± 0.27 and 27.73 ± 1.92 for Group B, respectively. Also, stiffer MMs were measured in Group AII (38.16 ± 3.61 kPa) than in Group AI (26.91 ± 2.13 kPa). In conclusion, the combination of SWE and US using a dynamic examination technique has the potential to be a valuable tool for the management of bruxism patients suffering from myofascial pain. MDPI 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10608340/ /pubmed/37888078 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13101467 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Aydin Aksu, Sibel
Kursoglu, Pinar
Turker, Izim
Baskak, Fulya
Ozen Sutuven, Elifnaz
Meric, Kaan
Cabbar, Fatih
Dynamic Quantitative Imaging of the Masseter Muscles in Bruxism Patients with Myofascial Pain: Could It Be an Objective Biomarker?
title Dynamic Quantitative Imaging of the Masseter Muscles in Bruxism Patients with Myofascial Pain: Could It Be an Objective Biomarker?
title_full Dynamic Quantitative Imaging of the Masseter Muscles in Bruxism Patients with Myofascial Pain: Could It Be an Objective Biomarker?
title_fullStr Dynamic Quantitative Imaging of the Masseter Muscles in Bruxism Patients with Myofascial Pain: Could It Be an Objective Biomarker?
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Quantitative Imaging of the Masseter Muscles in Bruxism Patients with Myofascial Pain: Could It Be an Objective Biomarker?
title_short Dynamic Quantitative Imaging of the Masseter Muscles in Bruxism Patients with Myofascial Pain: Could It Be an Objective Biomarker?
title_sort dynamic quantitative imaging of the masseter muscles in bruxism patients with myofascial pain: could it be an objective biomarker?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888078
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13101467
work_keys_str_mv AT aydinaksusibel dynamicquantitativeimagingofthemassetermusclesinbruxismpatientswithmyofascialpaincoulditbeanobjectivebiomarker
AT kursoglupinar dynamicquantitativeimagingofthemassetermusclesinbruxismpatientswithmyofascialpaincoulditbeanobjectivebiomarker
AT turkerizim dynamicquantitativeimagingofthemassetermusclesinbruxismpatientswithmyofascialpaincoulditbeanobjectivebiomarker
AT baskakfulya dynamicquantitativeimagingofthemassetermusclesinbruxismpatientswithmyofascialpaincoulditbeanobjectivebiomarker
AT ozensutuvenelifnaz dynamicquantitativeimagingofthemassetermusclesinbruxismpatientswithmyofascialpaincoulditbeanobjectivebiomarker
AT merickaan dynamicquantitativeimagingofthemassetermusclesinbruxismpatientswithmyofascialpaincoulditbeanobjectivebiomarker
AT cabbarfatih dynamicquantitativeimagingofthemassetermusclesinbruxismpatientswithmyofascialpaincoulditbeanobjectivebiomarker