Cargando…

High-Resolution Computed Tomography in Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: How Much Do We Need It?

Background and Objectives: The diagnosis of cholesteatoma is usually clinic, and the only efficient treatment is surgical. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is not considered absolutely necessary for the management of an uncomplicated cholesteatoma, but unsuspected situations from a clinica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stefanescu, Eugen Horatiu, Balica, Nicolae Constantin, Motoi, Sorin Bogdan, Grigorita, Laura, Georgescu, Madalina, Iovanescu, Gheorghe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893430
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101712
_version_ 1785127759025012736
author Stefanescu, Eugen Horatiu
Balica, Nicolae Constantin
Motoi, Sorin Bogdan
Grigorita, Laura
Georgescu, Madalina
Iovanescu, Gheorghe
author_facet Stefanescu, Eugen Horatiu
Balica, Nicolae Constantin
Motoi, Sorin Bogdan
Grigorita, Laura
Georgescu, Madalina
Iovanescu, Gheorghe
author_sort Stefanescu, Eugen Horatiu
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: The diagnosis of cholesteatoma is usually clinic, and the only efficient treatment is surgical. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is not considered absolutely necessary for the management of an uncomplicated cholesteatoma, but unsuspected situations from a clinical point of view can be discovered using the scans, warning the surgeon. Our objective is to compare HRCT scan information with intraoperative findings in patients with cholesteatoma and analyze the usefulness of a preoperative HRCT scan from a surgical point of view. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective descriptive study conducted in the Department of Otolaryngology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Romania, from May 2021 to April 2022. It was carried out on 46 patients with a clinical diagnosis of cholesteatoma who were consequently operated on in our department. All patients received full clinical and audiological examinations. In all cases, an HRCT scan was performed preoperatively as a mandatory investigation. Preoperative HRCT scans were analyzed, and their findings were compared to the intraoperative notes. The two sets of observations were analyzed using standard statistical methods. Results: Extensive cholesteatoma was the most common type of disease, involving 46% of the patients, followed by pars flaccida cholesteatoma (35%) and pars tensa cholesteatoma (19%). Eroded scutum was the most frequent lesion involving 70% of the patients, followed by incus erosion (67%). Comparison of the HRCT and intraoperative findings revealed a very good correlation for tegmen tympani erosion, sigmoid plate erosion, scutum and malleus erosion, and a moderate-to-good correlation for lateral semicircular canal erosion, incus and stapes erosion, and fallopian canal erosion. Conclusions: HRCT is a valuable tool in the preoperative assessment of cholesteatoma, helping in making surgical decisions. It can accurately predict the extent of disease and is helpful for detecting unapparent dangerous situations. However, it is not very accurate in detecting fallopian canal and stapes erosion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10608348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106083482023-10-28 High-Resolution Computed Tomography in Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: How Much Do We Need It? Stefanescu, Eugen Horatiu Balica, Nicolae Constantin Motoi, Sorin Bogdan Grigorita, Laura Georgescu, Madalina Iovanescu, Gheorghe Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: The diagnosis of cholesteatoma is usually clinic, and the only efficient treatment is surgical. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is not considered absolutely necessary for the management of an uncomplicated cholesteatoma, but unsuspected situations from a clinical point of view can be discovered using the scans, warning the surgeon. Our objective is to compare HRCT scan information with intraoperative findings in patients with cholesteatoma and analyze the usefulness of a preoperative HRCT scan from a surgical point of view. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective descriptive study conducted in the Department of Otolaryngology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Romania, from May 2021 to April 2022. It was carried out on 46 patients with a clinical diagnosis of cholesteatoma who were consequently operated on in our department. All patients received full clinical and audiological examinations. In all cases, an HRCT scan was performed preoperatively as a mandatory investigation. Preoperative HRCT scans were analyzed, and their findings were compared to the intraoperative notes. The two sets of observations were analyzed using standard statistical methods. Results: Extensive cholesteatoma was the most common type of disease, involving 46% of the patients, followed by pars flaccida cholesteatoma (35%) and pars tensa cholesteatoma (19%). Eroded scutum was the most frequent lesion involving 70% of the patients, followed by incus erosion (67%). Comparison of the HRCT and intraoperative findings revealed a very good correlation for tegmen tympani erosion, sigmoid plate erosion, scutum and malleus erosion, and a moderate-to-good correlation for lateral semicircular canal erosion, incus and stapes erosion, and fallopian canal erosion. Conclusions: HRCT is a valuable tool in the preoperative assessment of cholesteatoma, helping in making surgical decisions. It can accurately predict the extent of disease and is helpful for detecting unapparent dangerous situations. However, it is not very accurate in detecting fallopian canal and stapes erosion. MDPI 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10608348/ /pubmed/37893430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101712 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stefanescu, Eugen Horatiu
Balica, Nicolae Constantin
Motoi, Sorin Bogdan
Grigorita, Laura
Georgescu, Madalina
Iovanescu, Gheorghe
High-Resolution Computed Tomography in Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: How Much Do We Need It?
title High-Resolution Computed Tomography in Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: How Much Do We Need It?
title_full High-Resolution Computed Tomography in Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: How Much Do We Need It?
title_fullStr High-Resolution Computed Tomography in Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: How Much Do We Need It?
title_full_unstemmed High-Resolution Computed Tomography in Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: How Much Do We Need It?
title_short High-Resolution Computed Tomography in Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: How Much Do We Need It?
title_sort high-resolution computed tomography in middle ear cholesteatoma: how much do we need it?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893430
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101712
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanescueugenhoratiu highresolutioncomputedtomographyinmiddleearcholesteatomahowmuchdoweneedit
AT balicanicolaeconstantin highresolutioncomputedtomographyinmiddleearcholesteatomahowmuchdoweneedit
AT motoisorinbogdan highresolutioncomputedtomographyinmiddleearcholesteatomahowmuchdoweneedit
AT grigoritalaura highresolutioncomputedtomographyinmiddleearcholesteatomahowmuchdoweneedit
AT georgescumadalina highresolutioncomputedtomographyinmiddleearcholesteatomahowmuchdoweneedit
AT iovanescugheorghe highresolutioncomputedtomographyinmiddleearcholesteatomahowmuchdoweneedit