Cargando…

Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives: A relationship between endometrial polypectomy and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy outcomes has been reported; however, only a few studies have compared polyp removal techniques and pregnancy rates. We investigated whether different polypectomy techniques with endom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishioka, Mikiko, Maezawa, Tadashi, Takeuchi, Hiroki, Hagiwara, Katsuyuki, Tarui, Sachiyo, Sakamoto, Mito, Takayama, Erina, Yajima, Hideaki, Kondo, Eiji, Kawato, Hiroaki, Minoura, Hiroyuki, Sugaya, Ken, Fukuda, Aisaku, Ikeda, Tomoaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893586
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101868
_version_ 1785127774781964288
author Nishioka, Mikiko
Maezawa, Tadashi
Takeuchi, Hiroki
Hagiwara, Katsuyuki
Tarui, Sachiyo
Sakamoto, Mito
Takayama, Erina
Yajima, Hideaki
Kondo, Eiji
Kawato, Hiroaki
Minoura, Hiroyuki
Sugaya, Ken
Fukuda, Aisaku
Ikeda, Tomoaki
author_facet Nishioka, Mikiko
Maezawa, Tadashi
Takeuchi, Hiroki
Hagiwara, Katsuyuki
Tarui, Sachiyo
Sakamoto, Mito
Takayama, Erina
Yajima, Hideaki
Kondo, Eiji
Kawato, Hiroaki
Minoura, Hiroyuki
Sugaya, Ken
Fukuda, Aisaku
Ikeda, Tomoaki
author_sort Nishioka, Mikiko
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: A relationship between endometrial polypectomy and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy outcomes has been reported; however, only a few studies have compared polyp removal techniques and pregnancy rates. We investigated whether different polypectomy techniques with endometrial curettage and hysteroscopic polypectomy for endometrial polyps affect subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Materials and Methods: Data from 434 patients who had undergone polypectomy for suspected endometrial polyps using transvaginal ultrasonography before embryo transfer in IVF at four institutions between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall, there were 157 and 277 patients in the hysteroscopic (mean age: 35.0 years) and curettage (mean age: 37.3 years) groups, respectively. Single-blastocyst transfer cases were selected from both groups and age-matched to unify background factors. Results: In the single-blastocyst transfer cases, 148 (mean age: 35.0 years) and 196 (mean age: 35.9 years) were in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, with the 148 cases matched by age. In these cases, the pregnancy rates for the first embryo transfer were 68.2% (odds ratio (OR): 2.14) and 51.4% (OR: 1.06) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively; the resulting OR was 2.03. The pregnancy rates after up to the second transfer were 80.4% (OR: 4.10) and 68.2% (OR: 2.14) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, in which the OR was 1.91. The live birth rates were 66.2% (OR: 1.956) and 53.4% (OR: 1.15) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, in which the odds ratio was 1.71. These results show the effectiveness of hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy compared to polypectomy with endometrial curettage. No significant difference was found regarding the miscarriage rates between the two groups. Conclusions: Hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy resulted in a higher pregnancy rate in subsequent embryo transfer than polypectomy with endometrial curettage. Therefore, establishing a facility where polypectomy can be performed hysteroscopically is crucial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10608414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106084142023-10-28 Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study Nishioka, Mikiko Maezawa, Tadashi Takeuchi, Hiroki Hagiwara, Katsuyuki Tarui, Sachiyo Sakamoto, Mito Takayama, Erina Yajima, Hideaki Kondo, Eiji Kawato, Hiroaki Minoura, Hiroyuki Sugaya, Ken Fukuda, Aisaku Ikeda, Tomoaki Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: A relationship between endometrial polypectomy and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy outcomes has been reported; however, only a few studies have compared polyp removal techniques and pregnancy rates. We investigated whether different polypectomy techniques with endometrial curettage and hysteroscopic polypectomy for endometrial polyps affect subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Materials and Methods: Data from 434 patients who had undergone polypectomy for suspected endometrial polyps using transvaginal ultrasonography before embryo transfer in IVF at four institutions between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall, there were 157 and 277 patients in the hysteroscopic (mean age: 35.0 years) and curettage (mean age: 37.3 years) groups, respectively. Single-blastocyst transfer cases were selected from both groups and age-matched to unify background factors. Results: In the single-blastocyst transfer cases, 148 (mean age: 35.0 years) and 196 (mean age: 35.9 years) were in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, with the 148 cases matched by age. In these cases, the pregnancy rates for the first embryo transfer were 68.2% (odds ratio (OR): 2.14) and 51.4% (OR: 1.06) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively; the resulting OR was 2.03. The pregnancy rates after up to the second transfer were 80.4% (OR: 4.10) and 68.2% (OR: 2.14) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, in which the OR was 1.91. The live birth rates were 66.2% (OR: 1.956) and 53.4% (OR: 1.15) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, in which the odds ratio was 1.71. These results show the effectiveness of hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy compared to polypectomy with endometrial curettage. No significant difference was found regarding the miscarriage rates between the two groups. Conclusions: Hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy resulted in a higher pregnancy rate in subsequent embryo transfer than polypectomy with endometrial curettage. Therefore, establishing a facility where polypectomy can be performed hysteroscopically is crucial. MDPI 2023-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10608414/ /pubmed/37893586 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101868 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nishioka, Mikiko
Maezawa, Tadashi
Takeuchi, Hiroki
Hagiwara, Katsuyuki
Tarui, Sachiyo
Sakamoto, Mito
Takayama, Erina
Yajima, Hideaki
Kondo, Eiji
Kawato, Hiroaki
Minoura, Hiroyuki
Sugaya, Ken
Fukuda, Aisaku
Ikeda, Tomoaki
Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study
title Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study
title_full Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study
title_short Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study
title_sort pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy versus endometrial curettage polypectomy: a retrospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893586
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101868
work_keys_str_mv AT nishiokamikiko pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT maezawatadashi pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT takeuchihiroki pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT hagiwarakatsuyuki pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT taruisachiyo pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT sakamotomito pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT takayamaerina pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT yajimahideaki pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT kondoeiji pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT kawatohiroaki pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT minourahiroyuki pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT sugayaken pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT fukudaaisaku pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy
AT ikedatomoaki pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy