Cargando…
Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study
Background and Objectives: A relationship between endometrial polypectomy and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy outcomes has been reported; however, only a few studies have compared polyp removal techniques and pregnancy rates. We investigated whether different polypectomy techniques with endom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893586 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101868 |
_version_ | 1785127774781964288 |
---|---|
author | Nishioka, Mikiko Maezawa, Tadashi Takeuchi, Hiroki Hagiwara, Katsuyuki Tarui, Sachiyo Sakamoto, Mito Takayama, Erina Yajima, Hideaki Kondo, Eiji Kawato, Hiroaki Minoura, Hiroyuki Sugaya, Ken Fukuda, Aisaku Ikeda, Tomoaki |
author_facet | Nishioka, Mikiko Maezawa, Tadashi Takeuchi, Hiroki Hagiwara, Katsuyuki Tarui, Sachiyo Sakamoto, Mito Takayama, Erina Yajima, Hideaki Kondo, Eiji Kawato, Hiroaki Minoura, Hiroyuki Sugaya, Ken Fukuda, Aisaku Ikeda, Tomoaki |
author_sort | Nishioka, Mikiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objectives: A relationship between endometrial polypectomy and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy outcomes has been reported; however, only a few studies have compared polyp removal techniques and pregnancy rates. We investigated whether different polypectomy techniques with endometrial curettage and hysteroscopic polypectomy for endometrial polyps affect subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Materials and Methods: Data from 434 patients who had undergone polypectomy for suspected endometrial polyps using transvaginal ultrasonography before embryo transfer in IVF at four institutions between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall, there were 157 and 277 patients in the hysteroscopic (mean age: 35.0 years) and curettage (mean age: 37.3 years) groups, respectively. Single-blastocyst transfer cases were selected from both groups and age-matched to unify background factors. Results: In the single-blastocyst transfer cases, 148 (mean age: 35.0 years) and 196 (mean age: 35.9 years) were in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, with the 148 cases matched by age. In these cases, the pregnancy rates for the first embryo transfer were 68.2% (odds ratio (OR): 2.14) and 51.4% (OR: 1.06) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively; the resulting OR was 2.03. The pregnancy rates after up to the second transfer were 80.4% (OR: 4.10) and 68.2% (OR: 2.14) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, in which the OR was 1.91. The live birth rates were 66.2% (OR: 1.956) and 53.4% (OR: 1.15) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, in which the odds ratio was 1.71. These results show the effectiveness of hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy compared to polypectomy with endometrial curettage. No significant difference was found regarding the miscarriage rates between the two groups. Conclusions: Hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy resulted in a higher pregnancy rate in subsequent embryo transfer than polypectomy with endometrial curettage. Therefore, establishing a facility where polypectomy can be performed hysteroscopically is crucial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10608414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106084142023-10-28 Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study Nishioka, Mikiko Maezawa, Tadashi Takeuchi, Hiroki Hagiwara, Katsuyuki Tarui, Sachiyo Sakamoto, Mito Takayama, Erina Yajima, Hideaki Kondo, Eiji Kawato, Hiroaki Minoura, Hiroyuki Sugaya, Ken Fukuda, Aisaku Ikeda, Tomoaki Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: A relationship between endometrial polypectomy and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy outcomes has been reported; however, only a few studies have compared polyp removal techniques and pregnancy rates. We investigated whether different polypectomy techniques with endometrial curettage and hysteroscopic polypectomy for endometrial polyps affect subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Materials and Methods: Data from 434 patients who had undergone polypectomy for suspected endometrial polyps using transvaginal ultrasonography before embryo transfer in IVF at four institutions between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall, there were 157 and 277 patients in the hysteroscopic (mean age: 35.0 years) and curettage (mean age: 37.3 years) groups, respectively. Single-blastocyst transfer cases were selected from both groups and age-matched to unify background factors. Results: In the single-blastocyst transfer cases, 148 (mean age: 35.0 years) and 196 (mean age: 35.9 years) were in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, with the 148 cases matched by age. In these cases, the pregnancy rates for the first embryo transfer were 68.2% (odds ratio (OR): 2.14) and 51.4% (OR: 1.06) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively; the resulting OR was 2.03. The pregnancy rates after up to the second transfer were 80.4% (OR: 4.10) and 68.2% (OR: 2.14) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, in which the OR was 1.91. The live birth rates were 66.2% (OR: 1.956) and 53.4% (OR: 1.15) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, in which the odds ratio was 1.71. These results show the effectiveness of hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy compared to polypectomy with endometrial curettage. No significant difference was found regarding the miscarriage rates between the two groups. Conclusions: Hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy resulted in a higher pregnancy rate in subsequent embryo transfer than polypectomy with endometrial curettage. Therefore, establishing a facility where polypectomy can be performed hysteroscopically is crucial. MDPI 2023-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10608414/ /pubmed/37893586 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101868 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nishioka, Mikiko Maezawa, Tadashi Takeuchi, Hiroki Hagiwara, Katsuyuki Tarui, Sachiyo Sakamoto, Mito Takayama, Erina Yajima, Hideaki Kondo, Eiji Kawato, Hiroaki Minoura, Hiroyuki Sugaya, Ken Fukuda, Aisaku Ikeda, Tomoaki Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study |
title | Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study |
title_full | Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study |
title_short | Pregnancy Rates after Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy versus Endometrial Curettage Polypectomy: A Retrospective Study |
title_sort | pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy versus endometrial curettage polypectomy: a retrospective study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893586 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101868 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nishiokamikiko pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy AT maezawatadashi pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy AT takeuchihiroki pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy AT hagiwarakatsuyuki pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy AT taruisachiyo pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy AT sakamotomito pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy AT takayamaerina pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy AT yajimahideaki pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy AT kondoeiji pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy AT kawatohiroaki pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy AT minourahiroyuki pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy AT sugayaken pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy AT fukudaaisaku pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy AT ikedatomoaki pregnancyratesafterhysteroscopicendometrialpolypectomyversusendometrialcurettagepolypectomyaretrospectivestudy |