Cargando…
A Prospective Study on the Impact of Clinical Factors and Adjusted Triple D System for Success Rate of ESWL
Objective: Our study aimed to evaluate the success rate of ESWL and identify relevant treatment-specific factors affecting treatment outcomes, as well as to assess the accuracy of the updated Triple D scoring system and compare it with older systems. Material and Methods: A prospective study of 71 p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893545 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101827 |
_version_ | 1785127838079254528 |
---|---|
author | Snicorius, Marius Drevinskaitė, Mingailė Miglinas, Marius Čekauskas, Albertas Urbonienė, Vidita Bandzevičiūtė, Rimantė Čeponkus, Justinas Šablinskas, Valdas Želvys, Arunas |
author_facet | Snicorius, Marius Drevinskaitė, Mingailė Miglinas, Marius Čekauskas, Albertas Urbonienė, Vidita Bandzevičiūtė, Rimantė Čeponkus, Justinas Šablinskas, Valdas Želvys, Arunas |
author_sort | Snicorius, Marius |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Our study aimed to evaluate the success rate of ESWL and identify relevant treatment-specific factors affecting treatment outcomes, as well as to assess the accuracy of the updated Triple D scoring system and compare it with older systems. Material and Methods: A prospective study of 71 patients who received ESWL treatment for renal stones that were 5–15 mm in size was completed. The patient having no residual stones or residual stones lesser than 4 mm after ESWL was identified as a treatment success. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and ROC curves were used to identify important factors for treatment outcomes. Results: Successful treatment was achieved for 66.2% of patients. The stone volume (SV), mean stone density (MD), and delivered power to the stone volume unit ratio (SMLI/SV) were defined as the most critical factors influencing ESWL success. An updated Triple D score system with a, SMLI/SV ratio could be an alternative to older systems and reach an even higher accuracy. A limitation of this study is the limited sample size due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: Our results show that the three factors that most influence the success of ESWL are the stone size, mean stone density, and SMLI/SV ratio. Based on this, we present a simple updated triple D score system to predict ESWL success, which could be implemented in future clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10608682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106086822023-10-28 A Prospective Study on the Impact of Clinical Factors and Adjusted Triple D System for Success Rate of ESWL Snicorius, Marius Drevinskaitė, Mingailė Miglinas, Marius Čekauskas, Albertas Urbonienė, Vidita Bandzevičiūtė, Rimantė Čeponkus, Justinas Šablinskas, Valdas Želvys, Arunas Medicina (Kaunas) Article Objective: Our study aimed to evaluate the success rate of ESWL and identify relevant treatment-specific factors affecting treatment outcomes, as well as to assess the accuracy of the updated Triple D scoring system and compare it with older systems. Material and Methods: A prospective study of 71 patients who received ESWL treatment for renal stones that were 5–15 mm in size was completed. The patient having no residual stones or residual stones lesser than 4 mm after ESWL was identified as a treatment success. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and ROC curves were used to identify important factors for treatment outcomes. Results: Successful treatment was achieved for 66.2% of patients. The stone volume (SV), mean stone density (MD), and delivered power to the stone volume unit ratio (SMLI/SV) were defined as the most critical factors influencing ESWL success. An updated Triple D score system with a, SMLI/SV ratio could be an alternative to older systems and reach an even higher accuracy. A limitation of this study is the limited sample size due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: Our results show that the three factors that most influence the success of ESWL are the stone size, mean stone density, and SMLI/SV ratio. Based on this, we present a simple updated triple D score system to predict ESWL success, which could be implemented in future clinical practice. MDPI 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10608682/ /pubmed/37893545 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101827 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Snicorius, Marius Drevinskaitė, Mingailė Miglinas, Marius Čekauskas, Albertas Urbonienė, Vidita Bandzevičiūtė, Rimantė Čeponkus, Justinas Šablinskas, Valdas Želvys, Arunas A Prospective Study on the Impact of Clinical Factors and Adjusted Triple D System for Success Rate of ESWL |
title | A Prospective Study on the Impact of Clinical Factors and Adjusted Triple D System for Success Rate of ESWL |
title_full | A Prospective Study on the Impact of Clinical Factors and Adjusted Triple D System for Success Rate of ESWL |
title_fullStr | A Prospective Study on the Impact of Clinical Factors and Adjusted Triple D System for Success Rate of ESWL |
title_full_unstemmed | A Prospective Study on the Impact of Clinical Factors and Adjusted Triple D System for Success Rate of ESWL |
title_short | A Prospective Study on the Impact of Clinical Factors and Adjusted Triple D System for Success Rate of ESWL |
title_sort | prospective study on the impact of clinical factors and adjusted triple d system for success rate of eswl |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893545 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101827 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT snicoriusmarius aprospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT drevinskaitemingaile aprospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT miglinasmarius aprospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT cekauskasalbertas aprospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT urbonienevidita aprospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT bandzeviciuterimante aprospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT ceponkusjustinas aprospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT sablinskasvaldas aprospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT zelvysarunas aprospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT snicoriusmarius prospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT drevinskaitemingaile prospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT miglinasmarius prospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT cekauskasalbertas prospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT urbonienevidita prospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT bandzeviciuterimante prospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT ceponkusjustinas prospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT sablinskasvaldas prospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl AT zelvysarunas prospectivestudyontheimpactofclinicalfactorsandadjustedtripledsystemforsuccessrateofeswl |