Cargando…
Comparison of Thermophilic–Mesophilic and Mesophilic–Thermophilic Two-Phase High-Solid Sludge Anaerobic Digestion at Different Inoculation Proportions: Digestion Performance and Microbial Diversity
This study investigated the performance of thermophilic–mesophilic (T-M) and mesophilic–thermophilic (M-T) two-phase sludge anaerobic digestion at different inoculation proportions after a change in digestion temperature. After temperature change, the pH, total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), free ammonia n...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894067 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102409 |
_version_ | 1785127870287314944 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Tianfeng Wang, Jie Pu, Jiajia Bai, Chengxiang Peng, Cheng Shi, Hailong Wu, Ruoyu Xu, Ziying Zhang, Yuqian Luo, Dan Yang, Linhai Zhang, Qingfang |
author_facet | Wang, Tianfeng Wang, Jie Pu, Jiajia Bai, Chengxiang Peng, Cheng Shi, Hailong Wu, Ruoyu Xu, Ziying Zhang, Yuqian Luo, Dan Yang, Linhai Zhang, Qingfang |
author_sort | Wang, Tianfeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigated the performance of thermophilic–mesophilic (T-M) and mesophilic–thermophilic (M-T) two-phase sludge anaerobic digestion at different inoculation proportions after a change in digestion temperature. After temperature change, the pH, total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), free ammonia nitrogen (FAN), solubility chemical oxygen demand (SCOD), and total alkalinity (TA) levels of two-phase digesters were between thermophilic control digesters and mesophilic control digesters. However, the volatile fatty acid (VFA) levels of two-phase digesters were higher than those of thermophilic or mesophilic control digesters. The bacteria communities of M-T two-phase digesters were more diverse than those of T-M. After a change in digestion temperature, the bacterial community was dominated by Coprothermobacter. After a change of digestion temperature, the relative abundance (RA) of Methanobacterium, Methanosaeta, and Methanospirillum of M-T two-phase digesters was higher than that of T-M two-phase digesters. In comparison, the RA of Methanosarcina of T-M two-phase digesters was higher than that of M-T two-phase digesters. The ultimate methane yields of thermophilic control digesters were greater than those of mesophilic control digesters. Nevertheless, the ultimate methane yield levels of M-T two-phase digesters were greater than those of T-M two-phase digesters. The ultimate methane yields of all two-phase digesters presented an earlier increase and later decrease trend with the increasing inoculation proportion. Optimal methane production condition was achieved when 15% of sludge (T-M15) was inoculated under mesophilic–thermophilic conditions, which promoted 123.6% (based on mesophilic control) or 27.4% (based on thermophilic control). An optimal inoculation proportion (about 15%) balanced the number and activity of methanogens of high-solid sludge anaerobic digestion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10608829 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106088292023-10-28 Comparison of Thermophilic–Mesophilic and Mesophilic–Thermophilic Two-Phase High-Solid Sludge Anaerobic Digestion at Different Inoculation Proportions: Digestion Performance and Microbial Diversity Wang, Tianfeng Wang, Jie Pu, Jiajia Bai, Chengxiang Peng, Cheng Shi, Hailong Wu, Ruoyu Xu, Ziying Zhang, Yuqian Luo, Dan Yang, Linhai Zhang, Qingfang Microorganisms Article This study investigated the performance of thermophilic–mesophilic (T-M) and mesophilic–thermophilic (M-T) two-phase sludge anaerobic digestion at different inoculation proportions after a change in digestion temperature. After temperature change, the pH, total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), free ammonia nitrogen (FAN), solubility chemical oxygen demand (SCOD), and total alkalinity (TA) levels of two-phase digesters were between thermophilic control digesters and mesophilic control digesters. However, the volatile fatty acid (VFA) levels of two-phase digesters were higher than those of thermophilic or mesophilic control digesters. The bacteria communities of M-T two-phase digesters were more diverse than those of T-M. After a change in digestion temperature, the bacterial community was dominated by Coprothermobacter. After a change of digestion temperature, the relative abundance (RA) of Methanobacterium, Methanosaeta, and Methanospirillum of M-T two-phase digesters was higher than that of T-M two-phase digesters. In comparison, the RA of Methanosarcina of T-M two-phase digesters was higher than that of M-T two-phase digesters. The ultimate methane yields of thermophilic control digesters were greater than those of mesophilic control digesters. Nevertheless, the ultimate methane yield levels of M-T two-phase digesters were greater than those of T-M two-phase digesters. The ultimate methane yields of all two-phase digesters presented an earlier increase and later decrease trend with the increasing inoculation proportion. Optimal methane production condition was achieved when 15% of sludge (T-M15) was inoculated under mesophilic–thermophilic conditions, which promoted 123.6% (based on mesophilic control) or 27.4% (based on thermophilic control). An optimal inoculation proportion (about 15%) balanced the number and activity of methanogens of high-solid sludge anaerobic digestion. MDPI 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10608829/ /pubmed/37894067 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102409 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Tianfeng Wang, Jie Pu, Jiajia Bai, Chengxiang Peng, Cheng Shi, Hailong Wu, Ruoyu Xu, Ziying Zhang, Yuqian Luo, Dan Yang, Linhai Zhang, Qingfang Comparison of Thermophilic–Mesophilic and Mesophilic–Thermophilic Two-Phase High-Solid Sludge Anaerobic Digestion at Different Inoculation Proportions: Digestion Performance and Microbial Diversity |
title | Comparison of Thermophilic–Mesophilic and Mesophilic–Thermophilic Two-Phase High-Solid Sludge Anaerobic Digestion at Different Inoculation Proportions: Digestion Performance and Microbial Diversity |
title_full | Comparison of Thermophilic–Mesophilic and Mesophilic–Thermophilic Two-Phase High-Solid Sludge Anaerobic Digestion at Different Inoculation Proportions: Digestion Performance and Microbial Diversity |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Thermophilic–Mesophilic and Mesophilic–Thermophilic Two-Phase High-Solid Sludge Anaerobic Digestion at Different Inoculation Proportions: Digestion Performance and Microbial Diversity |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Thermophilic–Mesophilic and Mesophilic–Thermophilic Two-Phase High-Solid Sludge Anaerobic Digestion at Different Inoculation Proportions: Digestion Performance and Microbial Diversity |
title_short | Comparison of Thermophilic–Mesophilic and Mesophilic–Thermophilic Two-Phase High-Solid Sludge Anaerobic Digestion at Different Inoculation Proportions: Digestion Performance and Microbial Diversity |
title_sort | comparison of thermophilic–mesophilic and mesophilic–thermophilic two-phase high-solid sludge anaerobic digestion at different inoculation proportions: digestion performance and microbial diversity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894067 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102409 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangtianfeng comparisonofthermophilicmesophilicandmesophilicthermophilictwophasehighsolidsludgeanaerobicdigestionatdifferentinoculationproportionsdigestionperformanceandmicrobialdiversity AT wangjie comparisonofthermophilicmesophilicandmesophilicthermophilictwophasehighsolidsludgeanaerobicdigestionatdifferentinoculationproportionsdigestionperformanceandmicrobialdiversity AT pujiajia comparisonofthermophilicmesophilicandmesophilicthermophilictwophasehighsolidsludgeanaerobicdigestionatdifferentinoculationproportionsdigestionperformanceandmicrobialdiversity AT baichengxiang comparisonofthermophilicmesophilicandmesophilicthermophilictwophasehighsolidsludgeanaerobicdigestionatdifferentinoculationproportionsdigestionperformanceandmicrobialdiversity AT pengcheng comparisonofthermophilicmesophilicandmesophilicthermophilictwophasehighsolidsludgeanaerobicdigestionatdifferentinoculationproportionsdigestionperformanceandmicrobialdiversity AT shihailong comparisonofthermophilicmesophilicandmesophilicthermophilictwophasehighsolidsludgeanaerobicdigestionatdifferentinoculationproportionsdigestionperformanceandmicrobialdiversity AT wuruoyu comparisonofthermophilicmesophilicandmesophilicthermophilictwophasehighsolidsludgeanaerobicdigestionatdifferentinoculationproportionsdigestionperformanceandmicrobialdiversity AT xuziying comparisonofthermophilicmesophilicandmesophilicthermophilictwophasehighsolidsludgeanaerobicdigestionatdifferentinoculationproportionsdigestionperformanceandmicrobialdiversity AT zhangyuqian comparisonofthermophilicmesophilicandmesophilicthermophilictwophasehighsolidsludgeanaerobicdigestionatdifferentinoculationproportionsdigestionperformanceandmicrobialdiversity AT luodan comparisonofthermophilicmesophilicandmesophilicthermophilictwophasehighsolidsludgeanaerobicdigestionatdifferentinoculationproportionsdigestionperformanceandmicrobialdiversity AT yanglinhai comparisonofthermophilicmesophilicandmesophilicthermophilictwophasehighsolidsludgeanaerobicdigestionatdifferentinoculationproportionsdigestionperformanceandmicrobialdiversity AT zhangqingfang comparisonofthermophilicmesophilicandmesophilicthermophilictwophasehighsolidsludgeanaerobicdigestionatdifferentinoculationproportionsdigestionperformanceandmicrobialdiversity |