Cargando…
Comparison of Various Reducing Agents for Methane Production by Methanothermobacter marburgensis
Biological methanation is driven by anaerobic methanogenic archaea, cultivated in different media, which consist of multiple macro and micro nutrients. In addition, a reducing agent is needed to lower the oxidation–reduction potential (ORP) and enable the growth of oxygen-sensitive organisms. Until...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102533 |
_version_ | 1785127881169436672 |
---|---|
author | Mock, Maximilian Peter Ochi, Rayen Bieringer, Maria Bieringer, Tim Brotsack, Raimund Leyer, Stephan |
author_facet | Mock, Maximilian Peter Ochi, Rayen Bieringer, Maria Bieringer, Tim Brotsack, Raimund Leyer, Stephan |
author_sort | Mock, Maximilian Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biological methanation is driven by anaerobic methanogenic archaea, cultivated in different media, which consist of multiple macro and micro nutrients. In addition, a reducing agent is needed to lower the oxidation–reduction potential (ORP) and enable the growth of oxygen-sensitive organisms. Until now, sodium sulfide (Na(2)S) has been used mainly for this purpose based on earlier published articles at the beginning of anaerobic microbiology research. In a continuation of earlier investigations, in this study, the usage of alternative reducing agents like sodium dithionite (Na(2)S(2)O(4)) and L-Cysteine-HCl shows that similar results can be obtained with fewer environmental and hazardous impacts. Therefore, a newly developed comparison method was used for the cultivation of Methanothermobacter marburgensis. The median methane evolution rate (MER) for the alternatives was similar compared to Na(2)S at different concentrations (0.5, 0.25 and 0.1 g/L). However, the use of 0.25 g/L Na(2)S(2)O(4) or 0.1 g/L L-Cys-HCl led to stable MER values over consecutive batches compared to Na(2)S. It was also shown that a lower concentration of reducing agent leads to a higher MER. In conclusion, Na(2)S(2)O(4) or L-Cys-HCl can be used as a non-corrosive and non-toxic reducing agent for ex situ biological methanation. Economically, Na(2)S(2)O(4) is cheaper, which is particularly interesting for scale-up purposes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10608875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106088752023-10-28 Comparison of Various Reducing Agents for Methane Production by Methanothermobacter marburgensis Mock, Maximilian Peter Ochi, Rayen Bieringer, Maria Bieringer, Tim Brotsack, Raimund Leyer, Stephan Microorganisms Article Biological methanation is driven by anaerobic methanogenic archaea, cultivated in different media, which consist of multiple macro and micro nutrients. In addition, a reducing agent is needed to lower the oxidation–reduction potential (ORP) and enable the growth of oxygen-sensitive organisms. Until now, sodium sulfide (Na(2)S) has been used mainly for this purpose based on earlier published articles at the beginning of anaerobic microbiology research. In a continuation of earlier investigations, in this study, the usage of alternative reducing agents like sodium dithionite (Na(2)S(2)O(4)) and L-Cysteine-HCl shows that similar results can be obtained with fewer environmental and hazardous impacts. Therefore, a newly developed comparison method was used for the cultivation of Methanothermobacter marburgensis. The median methane evolution rate (MER) for the alternatives was similar compared to Na(2)S at different concentrations (0.5, 0.25 and 0.1 g/L). However, the use of 0.25 g/L Na(2)S(2)O(4) or 0.1 g/L L-Cys-HCl led to stable MER values over consecutive batches compared to Na(2)S. It was also shown that a lower concentration of reducing agent leads to a higher MER. In conclusion, Na(2)S(2)O(4) or L-Cys-HCl can be used as a non-corrosive and non-toxic reducing agent for ex situ biological methanation. Economically, Na(2)S(2)O(4) is cheaper, which is particularly interesting for scale-up purposes. MDPI 2023-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10608875/ /pubmed/37894191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102533 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mock, Maximilian Peter Ochi, Rayen Bieringer, Maria Bieringer, Tim Brotsack, Raimund Leyer, Stephan Comparison of Various Reducing Agents for Methane Production by Methanothermobacter marburgensis |
title | Comparison of Various Reducing Agents for Methane Production by Methanothermobacter marburgensis |
title_full | Comparison of Various Reducing Agents for Methane Production by Methanothermobacter marburgensis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Various Reducing Agents for Methane Production by Methanothermobacter marburgensis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Various Reducing Agents for Methane Production by Methanothermobacter marburgensis |
title_short | Comparison of Various Reducing Agents for Methane Production by Methanothermobacter marburgensis |
title_sort | comparison of various reducing agents for methane production by methanothermobacter marburgensis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102533 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mockmaximilianpeter comparisonofvariousreducingagentsformethaneproductionbymethanothermobactermarburgensis AT ochirayen comparisonofvariousreducingagentsformethaneproductionbymethanothermobactermarburgensis AT bieringermaria comparisonofvariousreducingagentsformethaneproductionbymethanothermobactermarburgensis AT bieringertim comparisonofvariousreducingagentsformethaneproductionbymethanothermobactermarburgensis AT brotsackraimund comparisonofvariousreducingagentsformethaneproductionbymethanothermobactermarburgensis AT leyerstephan comparisonofvariousreducingagentsformethaneproductionbymethanothermobactermarburgensis |