Cargando…

Is Personal Protective Equipment Worth the Hassle? Annual Risk of Cryptosporidiosis to Dairy Farmers and How Personal Protective Equipment and Handwashing Can Mitigate It

Cows are known carriers of Cryptosporidium parvum (C. parvum), a protozoa that can cause the gastrointestinal illness cryptosporidiosis in humans. Despite this potential exposure, dairy farmers tend to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) to protect the milk from contamination, rather than to pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mraz, Alexis L., Mutyala, Nandini, Cleary, Seana, Seals, Brenda F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10609119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102413
_version_ 1785127938318925824
author Mraz, Alexis L.
Mutyala, Nandini
Cleary, Seana
Seals, Brenda F.
author_facet Mraz, Alexis L.
Mutyala, Nandini
Cleary, Seana
Seals, Brenda F.
author_sort Mraz, Alexis L.
collection PubMed
description Cows are known carriers of Cryptosporidium parvum (C. parvum), a protozoa that can cause the gastrointestinal illness cryptosporidiosis in humans. Despite this potential exposure, dairy farmers tend to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) to protect the milk from contamination, rather than to protect themselves from zoonotic diseases, such as cryptosporidiosis. In this study, cow feces were collected from individual cattle on dairy farms and analyzed for C. parvum using qPCR. Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) was used to determine the risk of cryptosporidiosis to the dairy farmer with and without the use of handwashing and PPE (gloves and masks). The annualized risk of cryptosporidiosis to dairy farmers was 29.08% but was reduced significantly in each of the three interventions. Among the individual interventions, glove use provided the greatest reduction in risk, bringing the annual risk of cryptosporidiosis to 4.82%. Implementing regular handwashing, the use of gloves and a mask brought the annual risk of cryptosporidiosis to 1.29%. This study provides evidence that handwashing and PPE use can significantly reduce the risk of cryptosporidiosis to farmers and is worth implementing despite potential barriers such as discomfort and cost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10609119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106091192023-10-28 Is Personal Protective Equipment Worth the Hassle? Annual Risk of Cryptosporidiosis to Dairy Farmers and How Personal Protective Equipment and Handwashing Can Mitigate It Mraz, Alexis L. Mutyala, Nandini Cleary, Seana Seals, Brenda F. Microorganisms Article Cows are known carriers of Cryptosporidium parvum (C. parvum), a protozoa that can cause the gastrointestinal illness cryptosporidiosis in humans. Despite this potential exposure, dairy farmers tend to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) to protect the milk from contamination, rather than to protect themselves from zoonotic diseases, such as cryptosporidiosis. In this study, cow feces were collected from individual cattle on dairy farms and analyzed for C. parvum using qPCR. Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) was used to determine the risk of cryptosporidiosis to the dairy farmer with and without the use of handwashing and PPE (gloves and masks). The annualized risk of cryptosporidiosis to dairy farmers was 29.08% but was reduced significantly in each of the three interventions. Among the individual interventions, glove use provided the greatest reduction in risk, bringing the annual risk of cryptosporidiosis to 4.82%. Implementing regular handwashing, the use of gloves and a mask brought the annual risk of cryptosporidiosis to 1.29%. This study provides evidence that handwashing and PPE use can significantly reduce the risk of cryptosporidiosis to farmers and is worth implementing despite potential barriers such as discomfort and cost. MDPI 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10609119/ /pubmed/37894073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102413 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mraz, Alexis L.
Mutyala, Nandini
Cleary, Seana
Seals, Brenda F.
Is Personal Protective Equipment Worth the Hassle? Annual Risk of Cryptosporidiosis to Dairy Farmers and How Personal Protective Equipment and Handwashing Can Mitigate It
title Is Personal Protective Equipment Worth the Hassle? Annual Risk of Cryptosporidiosis to Dairy Farmers and How Personal Protective Equipment and Handwashing Can Mitigate It
title_full Is Personal Protective Equipment Worth the Hassle? Annual Risk of Cryptosporidiosis to Dairy Farmers and How Personal Protective Equipment and Handwashing Can Mitigate It
title_fullStr Is Personal Protective Equipment Worth the Hassle? Annual Risk of Cryptosporidiosis to Dairy Farmers and How Personal Protective Equipment and Handwashing Can Mitigate It
title_full_unstemmed Is Personal Protective Equipment Worth the Hassle? Annual Risk of Cryptosporidiosis to Dairy Farmers and How Personal Protective Equipment and Handwashing Can Mitigate It
title_short Is Personal Protective Equipment Worth the Hassle? Annual Risk of Cryptosporidiosis to Dairy Farmers and How Personal Protective Equipment and Handwashing Can Mitigate It
title_sort is personal protective equipment worth the hassle? annual risk of cryptosporidiosis to dairy farmers and how personal protective equipment and handwashing can mitigate it
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10609119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102413
work_keys_str_mv AT mrazalexisl ispersonalprotectiveequipmentworththehassleannualriskofcryptosporidiosistodairyfarmersandhowpersonalprotectiveequipmentandhandwashingcanmitigateit
AT mutyalanandini ispersonalprotectiveequipmentworththehassleannualriskofcryptosporidiosistodairyfarmersandhowpersonalprotectiveequipmentandhandwashingcanmitigateit
AT clearyseana ispersonalprotectiveequipmentworththehassleannualriskofcryptosporidiosistodairyfarmersandhowpersonalprotectiveequipmentandhandwashingcanmitigateit
AT sealsbrendaf ispersonalprotectiveequipmentworththehassleannualriskofcryptosporidiosistodairyfarmersandhowpersonalprotectiveequipmentandhandwashingcanmitigateit