Cargando…

A Survey of Archaeal Restriction–Modification Systems

When compared with bacteria, relatively little is known about the restriction–modification (RM) systems of archaea, particularly those in taxa outside of the haloarchaea. To improve our understanding of archaeal RM systems, we surveyed REBASE, the restriction enzyme database, to catalog what is know...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anton, Brian P., Roberts, Richard J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10609329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894082
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102424
_version_ 1785127988193394688
author Anton, Brian P.
Roberts, Richard J.
author_facet Anton, Brian P.
Roberts, Richard J.
author_sort Anton, Brian P.
collection PubMed
description When compared with bacteria, relatively little is known about the restriction–modification (RM) systems of archaea, particularly those in taxa outside of the haloarchaea. To improve our understanding of archaeal RM systems, we surveyed REBASE, the restriction enzyme database, to catalog what is known about the genes and activities present in the 519 completely sequenced archaeal genomes currently deposited there. For 49 (9.4%) of these genomes, we also have methylome data from Single-Molecule Real-Time (SMRT) sequencing that reveal the target recognition sites of the active m(6)A and m(4)C DNA methyltransferases (MTases). The gene-finding pipeline employed by REBASE is trained primarily on bacterial examples and so will look for similar genes in archaea. Nonetheless, the organizational structure and protein sequence of RM systems from archaea are highly similar to those of bacteria, with both groups acquiring systems from a shared genetic pool through horizontal gene transfer. As in bacteria, we observe numerous examples of “persistent” DNA MTases conserved within archaeal taxa at different levels. We experimentally validated two homologous members of one of the largest “persistent” MTase groups, revealing that methylation of C(m(5)C)WGG sites may play a key epigenetic role in Crenarchaea. Throughout the archaea, genes encoding m(6)A, m(4)C, and m(5)C DNA MTases, respectively, occur in approximately the ratio 4:2:1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10609329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106093292023-10-28 A Survey of Archaeal Restriction–Modification Systems Anton, Brian P. Roberts, Richard J. Microorganisms Article When compared with bacteria, relatively little is known about the restriction–modification (RM) systems of archaea, particularly those in taxa outside of the haloarchaea. To improve our understanding of archaeal RM systems, we surveyed REBASE, the restriction enzyme database, to catalog what is known about the genes and activities present in the 519 completely sequenced archaeal genomes currently deposited there. For 49 (9.4%) of these genomes, we also have methylome data from Single-Molecule Real-Time (SMRT) sequencing that reveal the target recognition sites of the active m(6)A and m(4)C DNA methyltransferases (MTases). The gene-finding pipeline employed by REBASE is trained primarily on bacterial examples and so will look for similar genes in archaea. Nonetheless, the organizational structure and protein sequence of RM systems from archaea are highly similar to those of bacteria, with both groups acquiring systems from a shared genetic pool through horizontal gene transfer. As in bacteria, we observe numerous examples of “persistent” DNA MTases conserved within archaeal taxa at different levels. We experimentally validated two homologous members of one of the largest “persistent” MTase groups, revealing that methylation of C(m(5)C)WGG sites may play a key epigenetic role in Crenarchaea. Throughout the archaea, genes encoding m(6)A, m(4)C, and m(5)C DNA MTases, respectively, occur in approximately the ratio 4:2:1. MDPI 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10609329/ /pubmed/37894082 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102424 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Anton, Brian P.
Roberts, Richard J.
A Survey of Archaeal Restriction–Modification Systems
title A Survey of Archaeal Restriction–Modification Systems
title_full A Survey of Archaeal Restriction–Modification Systems
title_fullStr A Survey of Archaeal Restriction–Modification Systems
title_full_unstemmed A Survey of Archaeal Restriction–Modification Systems
title_short A Survey of Archaeal Restriction–Modification Systems
title_sort survey of archaeal restriction–modification systems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10609329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894082
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102424
work_keys_str_mv AT antonbrianp asurveyofarchaealrestrictionmodificationsystems
AT robertsrichardj asurveyofarchaealrestrictionmodificationsystems
AT antonbrianp surveyofarchaealrestrictionmodificationsystems
AT robertsrichardj surveyofarchaealrestrictionmodificationsystems