Cargando…
A Survey of Archaeal Restriction–Modification Systems
When compared with bacteria, relatively little is known about the restriction–modification (RM) systems of archaea, particularly those in taxa outside of the haloarchaea. To improve our understanding of archaeal RM systems, we surveyed REBASE, the restriction enzyme database, to catalog what is know...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10609329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894082 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102424 |
_version_ | 1785127988193394688 |
---|---|
author | Anton, Brian P. Roberts, Richard J. |
author_facet | Anton, Brian P. Roberts, Richard J. |
author_sort | Anton, Brian P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | When compared with bacteria, relatively little is known about the restriction–modification (RM) systems of archaea, particularly those in taxa outside of the haloarchaea. To improve our understanding of archaeal RM systems, we surveyed REBASE, the restriction enzyme database, to catalog what is known about the genes and activities present in the 519 completely sequenced archaeal genomes currently deposited there. For 49 (9.4%) of these genomes, we also have methylome data from Single-Molecule Real-Time (SMRT) sequencing that reveal the target recognition sites of the active m(6)A and m(4)C DNA methyltransferases (MTases). The gene-finding pipeline employed by REBASE is trained primarily on bacterial examples and so will look for similar genes in archaea. Nonetheless, the organizational structure and protein sequence of RM systems from archaea are highly similar to those of bacteria, with both groups acquiring systems from a shared genetic pool through horizontal gene transfer. As in bacteria, we observe numerous examples of “persistent” DNA MTases conserved within archaeal taxa at different levels. We experimentally validated two homologous members of one of the largest “persistent” MTase groups, revealing that methylation of C(m(5)C)WGG sites may play a key epigenetic role in Crenarchaea. Throughout the archaea, genes encoding m(6)A, m(4)C, and m(5)C DNA MTases, respectively, occur in approximately the ratio 4:2:1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10609329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106093292023-10-28 A Survey of Archaeal Restriction–Modification Systems Anton, Brian P. Roberts, Richard J. Microorganisms Article When compared with bacteria, relatively little is known about the restriction–modification (RM) systems of archaea, particularly those in taxa outside of the haloarchaea. To improve our understanding of archaeal RM systems, we surveyed REBASE, the restriction enzyme database, to catalog what is known about the genes and activities present in the 519 completely sequenced archaeal genomes currently deposited there. For 49 (9.4%) of these genomes, we also have methylome data from Single-Molecule Real-Time (SMRT) sequencing that reveal the target recognition sites of the active m(6)A and m(4)C DNA methyltransferases (MTases). The gene-finding pipeline employed by REBASE is trained primarily on bacterial examples and so will look for similar genes in archaea. Nonetheless, the organizational structure and protein sequence of RM systems from archaea are highly similar to those of bacteria, with both groups acquiring systems from a shared genetic pool through horizontal gene transfer. As in bacteria, we observe numerous examples of “persistent” DNA MTases conserved within archaeal taxa at different levels. We experimentally validated two homologous members of one of the largest “persistent” MTase groups, revealing that methylation of C(m(5)C)WGG sites may play a key epigenetic role in Crenarchaea. Throughout the archaea, genes encoding m(6)A, m(4)C, and m(5)C DNA MTases, respectively, occur in approximately the ratio 4:2:1. MDPI 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10609329/ /pubmed/37894082 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102424 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Anton, Brian P. Roberts, Richard J. A Survey of Archaeal Restriction–Modification Systems |
title | A Survey of Archaeal Restriction–Modification Systems |
title_full | A Survey of Archaeal Restriction–Modification Systems |
title_fullStr | A Survey of Archaeal Restriction–Modification Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | A Survey of Archaeal Restriction–Modification Systems |
title_short | A Survey of Archaeal Restriction–Modification Systems |
title_sort | survey of archaeal restriction–modification systems |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10609329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894082 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102424 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT antonbrianp asurveyofarchaealrestrictionmodificationsystems AT robertsrichardj asurveyofarchaealrestrictionmodificationsystems AT antonbrianp surveyofarchaealrestrictionmodificationsystems AT robertsrichardj surveyofarchaealrestrictionmodificationsystems |