Cargando…

Drug Therapy Safety in Palliative Care—Pharmaceutical Analysis of Medication Processes in Palliative Care

Pharmacotherapy plays a crucial role in symptom management in palliative care and is associated with risks potentially leading to drug-related problems (DRP). Pharmacists can identify DRPs and advise prescribers on optimizing drug therapy. The aim of this study was to identify DRP in a palliative ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krumm, Lisa, Bausewein, Claudia, Rémi, Constanze
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10610412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888505
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy11050160
_version_ 1785128248729927680
author Krumm, Lisa
Bausewein, Claudia
Rémi, Constanze
author_facet Krumm, Lisa
Bausewein, Claudia
Rémi, Constanze
author_sort Krumm, Lisa
collection PubMed
description Pharmacotherapy plays a crucial role in symptom management in palliative care and is associated with risks potentially leading to drug-related problems (DRP). Pharmacists can identify DRPs and advise prescribers on optimizing drug therapy. The aim of this study was to identify DRP in a palliative care unit (PCU) and evaluate corresponding pharmaceutical interventions. A non-randomized before-and-after study in a PCU starts with a control phase, an interphase, and an intervention phase. Primary endpoint: DRP, including pharmaceutical interventions and their acceptance. The medication of all inpatients was recorded at set time points, assessed for potential and manifest DRP, and categorized. In the control phase, the ward pharmacist did not interfere with the clinical team. In the intervention phase, the pharmacist could intervene when a DRP was identified and give recommendations. During the 12-month period, 284 patients were included (control phase n = 138; intervention phase n = 146) and 1079 DRPs were identified (control phase n = 634; intervention phase n = 445). The number of DRPs/patient was significantly reduced by the pharmacist’s interventions between the control and intervention phases (4 vs. 3 DRPs, p = 0.001). Overall acceptance of pharmaceutical interventions by prescribers was very high (227/256; 88%). DRPs are hardly preventable. With a clinical pharmacist as a member of the palliative care team, it is possible to reduce the number of DRPs and identify potential problems earlier.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10610412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106104122023-10-28 Drug Therapy Safety in Palliative Care—Pharmaceutical Analysis of Medication Processes in Palliative Care Krumm, Lisa Bausewein, Claudia Rémi, Constanze Pharmacy (Basel) Article Pharmacotherapy plays a crucial role in symptom management in palliative care and is associated with risks potentially leading to drug-related problems (DRP). Pharmacists can identify DRPs and advise prescribers on optimizing drug therapy. The aim of this study was to identify DRP in a palliative care unit (PCU) and evaluate corresponding pharmaceutical interventions. A non-randomized before-and-after study in a PCU starts with a control phase, an interphase, and an intervention phase. Primary endpoint: DRP, including pharmaceutical interventions and their acceptance. The medication of all inpatients was recorded at set time points, assessed for potential and manifest DRP, and categorized. In the control phase, the ward pharmacist did not interfere with the clinical team. In the intervention phase, the pharmacist could intervene when a DRP was identified and give recommendations. During the 12-month period, 284 patients were included (control phase n = 138; intervention phase n = 146) and 1079 DRPs were identified (control phase n = 634; intervention phase n = 445). The number of DRPs/patient was significantly reduced by the pharmacist’s interventions between the control and intervention phases (4 vs. 3 DRPs, p = 0.001). Overall acceptance of pharmaceutical interventions by prescribers was very high (227/256; 88%). DRPs are hardly preventable. With a clinical pharmacist as a member of the palliative care team, it is possible to reduce the number of DRPs and identify potential problems earlier. MDPI 2023-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10610412/ /pubmed/37888505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy11050160 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Krumm, Lisa
Bausewein, Claudia
Rémi, Constanze
Drug Therapy Safety in Palliative Care—Pharmaceutical Analysis of Medication Processes in Palliative Care
title Drug Therapy Safety in Palliative Care—Pharmaceutical Analysis of Medication Processes in Palliative Care
title_full Drug Therapy Safety in Palliative Care—Pharmaceutical Analysis of Medication Processes in Palliative Care
title_fullStr Drug Therapy Safety in Palliative Care—Pharmaceutical Analysis of Medication Processes in Palliative Care
title_full_unstemmed Drug Therapy Safety in Palliative Care—Pharmaceutical Analysis of Medication Processes in Palliative Care
title_short Drug Therapy Safety in Palliative Care—Pharmaceutical Analysis of Medication Processes in Palliative Care
title_sort drug therapy safety in palliative care—pharmaceutical analysis of medication processes in palliative care
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10610412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888505
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy11050160
work_keys_str_mv AT krummlisa drugtherapysafetyinpalliativecarepharmaceuticalanalysisofmedicationprocessesinpalliativecare
AT bauseweinclaudia drugtherapysafetyinpalliativecarepharmaceuticalanalysisofmedicationprocessesinpalliativecare
AT remiconstanze drugtherapysafetyinpalliativecarepharmaceuticalanalysisofmedicationprocessesinpalliativecare