Cargando…
Comparing Three Methods of Selecting Training Samples in Supervised Classification of Multispectral Remote Sensing Images
Selecting training samples is crucial in remote sensing image classification. In this paper, we selected three images—Sentinel-2, GF-1, and Landsat 8—and employed three methods for selecting training samples: grouping selection, entropy-based selection, and direct selection. We then used the selecte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10610573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37896624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23208530 |
_version_ | 1785128288467812352 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Hongying He, Jinxin Chen, Shengbo Zhan, Ye Bai, Yanyan Qin, Yujia |
author_facet | Zhang, Hongying He, Jinxin Chen, Shengbo Zhan, Ye Bai, Yanyan Qin, Yujia |
author_sort | Zhang, Hongying |
collection | PubMed |
description | Selecting training samples is crucial in remote sensing image classification. In this paper, we selected three images—Sentinel-2, GF-1, and Landsat 8—and employed three methods for selecting training samples: grouping selection, entropy-based selection, and direct selection. We then used the selected training samples to train three supervised classification models—random forest (RF), support-vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighbor (KNN)—and evaluated the classification results of the three images. According to the experimental results, the three classification models performed similarly. Compared with the entropy-based method, the grouping selection method achieved higher classification accuracy using fewer samples. In addition, the grouping selection method outperformed the direct selection method with the same number of samples. Therefore, the grouping selection method performed the best. When using the grouping selection method, the image classification accuracy increased with the increase in the number of samples within a certain sample size range. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10610573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106105732023-10-28 Comparing Three Methods of Selecting Training Samples in Supervised Classification of Multispectral Remote Sensing Images Zhang, Hongying He, Jinxin Chen, Shengbo Zhan, Ye Bai, Yanyan Qin, Yujia Sensors (Basel) Article Selecting training samples is crucial in remote sensing image classification. In this paper, we selected three images—Sentinel-2, GF-1, and Landsat 8—and employed three methods for selecting training samples: grouping selection, entropy-based selection, and direct selection. We then used the selected training samples to train three supervised classification models—random forest (RF), support-vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighbor (KNN)—and evaluated the classification results of the three images. According to the experimental results, the three classification models performed similarly. Compared with the entropy-based method, the grouping selection method achieved higher classification accuracy using fewer samples. In addition, the grouping selection method outperformed the direct selection method with the same number of samples. Therefore, the grouping selection method performed the best. When using the grouping selection method, the image classification accuracy increased with the increase in the number of samples within a certain sample size range. MDPI 2023-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10610573/ /pubmed/37896624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23208530 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Hongying He, Jinxin Chen, Shengbo Zhan, Ye Bai, Yanyan Qin, Yujia Comparing Three Methods of Selecting Training Samples in Supervised Classification of Multispectral Remote Sensing Images |
title | Comparing Three Methods of Selecting Training Samples in Supervised Classification of Multispectral Remote Sensing Images |
title_full | Comparing Three Methods of Selecting Training Samples in Supervised Classification of Multispectral Remote Sensing Images |
title_fullStr | Comparing Three Methods of Selecting Training Samples in Supervised Classification of Multispectral Remote Sensing Images |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Three Methods of Selecting Training Samples in Supervised Classification of Multispectral Remote Sensing Images |
title_short | Comparing Three Methods of Selecting Training Samples in Supervised Classification of Multispectral Remote Sensing Images |
title_sort | comparing three methods of selecting training samples in supervised classification of multispectral remote sensing images |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10610573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37896624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23208530 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanghongying comparingthreemethodsofselectingtrainingsamplesinsupervisedclassificationofmultispectralremotesensingimages AT hejinxin comparingthreemethodsofselectingtrainingsamplesinsupervisedclassificationofmultispectralremotesensingimages AT chenshengbo comparingthreemethodsofselectingtrainingsamplesinsupervisedclassificationofmultispectralremotesensingimages AT zhanye comparingthreemethodsofselectingtrainingsamplesinsupervisedclassificationofmultispectralremotesensingimages AT baiyanyan comparingthreemethodsofselectingtrainingsamplesinsupervisedclassificationofmultispectralremotesensingimages AT qinyujia comparingthreemethodsofselectingtrainingsamplesinsupervisedclassificationofmultispectralremotesensingimages |