Cargando…
“Pseudo”-Secondary Treatment Failure Explained via Disease Progression and Effective Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Pilot Simulation Study
Background: The objective of this study was to provide evidence from a simple simulation. In patients with focal dystonia, an initial good response to botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections followed by a secondary worsening does not necessarily arise from an antibody-induced secondary treatment fail...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10610736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins15100618 |
_version_ | 1785128327533559808 |
---|---|
author | Hefter, Harald Rosenthal, Dietmar Samadzadeh, Sara |
author_facet | Hefter, Harald Rosenthal, Dietmar Samadzadeh, Sara |
author_sort | Hefter, Harald |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The objective of this study was to provide evidence from a simple simulation. In patients with focal dystonia, an initial good response to botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections followed by a secondary worsening does not necessarily arise from an antibody-induced secondary treatment failure (NAB-STF), but may stem from a “pseudo”-secondary treatment failure (PSEUDO-STF). Methods: The simulation of the outcome after BoNT long-term treatment was performed in four steps: 1. The effect of the first single BoNT injection (SI curve) was displayed as a 12-point graph, corresponding to the mean improvement from weeks 1 to 12. 2. The remaining severity of the dystonia during the nth injection cycle was calculated by subtracting the SI curve (weighted by the outcome after n − 1 cycles) from the outcome after week 12 of the (n − 1)th cycle. 3. A graph was chosen (the PRO curve), which represents the progression of the severity of the underlying disease during BoNT therapy. 4. The interaction between the outcome during the nth BoNT cycle and the PRO curve was determined. Results: When the long-term outcome after n cycles of BoNT injections (applied every 3 months) was simulated as an interactive process, subtracting the effect of the first cycle (weighted by the outcome after n − 1 cycles) and adding the progression of the disease, an initial good improvement followed by secondary worsening results. This long-term outcome depends on the steepness of the progression and the duration of action of the first injection cycle. We termed this response behavior a “pseudo”-secondary treatment failure, as it can be compensated via a dose increase. Conclusion: A secondary worsening following an initial good response in BoNT therapy of focal dystonia might not necessarily indicate neutralizing antibody induction but could stem from a “PSEUDO”-STF (a combination of good response behavior and progression of the underlying disease). Thus, an adequate dose adaptation must be conducted before diagnosing a secondary treatment failure in the strict sense. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10610736 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106107362023-10-28 “Pseudo”-Secondary Treatment Failure Explained via Disease Progression and Effective Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Pilot Simulation Study Hefter, Harald Rosenthal, Dietmar Samadzadeh, Sara Toxins (Basel) Article Background: The objective of this study was to provide evidence from a simple simulation. In patients with focal dystonia, an initial good response to botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections followed by a secondary worsening does not necessarily arise from an antibody-induced secondary treatment failure (NAB-STF), but may stem from a “pseudo”-secondary treatment failure (PSEUDO-STF). Methods: The simulation of the outcome after BoNT long-term treatment was performed in four steps: 1. The effect of the first single BoNT injection (SI curve) was displayed as a 12-point graph, corresponding to the mean improvement from weeks 1 to 12. 2. The remaining severity of the dystonia during the nth injection cycle was calculated by subtracting the SI curve (weighted by the outcome after n − 1 cycles) from the outcome after week 12 of the (n − 1)th cycle. 3. A graph was chosen (the PRO curve), which represents the progression of the severity of the underlying disease during BoNT therapy. 4. The interaction between the outcome during the nth BoNT cycle and the PRO curve was determined. Results: When the long-term outcome after n cycles of BoNT injections (applied every 3 months) was simulated as an interactive process, subtracting the effect of the first cycle (weighted by the outcome after n − 1 cycles) and adding the progression of the disease, an initial good improvement followed by secondary worsening results. This long-term outcome depends on the steepness of the progression and the duration of action of the first injection cycle. We termed this response behavior a “pseudo”-secondary treatment failure, as it can be compensated via a dose increase. Conclusion: A secondary worsening following an initial good response in BoNT therapy of focal dystonia might not necessarily indicate neutralizing antibody induction but could stem from a “PSEUDO”-STF (a combination of good response behavior and progression of the underlying disease). Thus, an adequate dose adaptation must be conducted before diagnosing a secondary treatment failure in the strict sense. MDPI 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10610736/ /pubmed/37888649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins15100618 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hefter, Harald Rosenthal, Dietmar Samadzadeh, Sara “Pseudo”-Secondary Treatment Failure Explained via Disease Progression and Effective Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Pilot Simulation Study |
title | “Pseudo”-Secondary Treatment Failure Explained via Disease Progression and Effective Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Pilot Simulation Study |
title_full | “Pseudo”-Secondary Treatment Failure Explained via Disease Progression and Effective Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Pilot Simulation Study |
title_fullStr | “Pseudo”-Secondary Treatment Failure Explained via Disease Progression and Effective Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Pilot Simulation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | “Pseudo”-Secondary Treatment Failure Explained via Disease Progression and Effective Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Pilot Simulation Study |
title_short | “Pseudo”-Secondary Treatment Failure Explained via Disease Progression and Effective Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Pilot Simulation Study |
title_sort | “pseudo”-secondary treatment failure explained via disease progression and effective botulinum toxin therapy: a pilot simulation study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10610736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins15100618 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hefterharald pseudosecondarytreatmentfailureexplainedviadiseaseprogressionandeffectivebotulinumtoxintherapyapilotsimulationstudy AT rosenthaldietmar pseudosecondarytreatmentfailureexplainedviadiseaseprogressionandeffectivebotulinumtoxintherapyapilotsimulationstudy AT samadzadehsara pseudosecondarytreatmentfailureexplainedviadiseaseprogressionandeffectivebotulinumtoxintherapyapilotsimulationstudy |