Cargando…

“Pseudo”-Secondary Treatment Failure Explained via Disease Progression and Effective Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Pilot Simulation Study

Background: The objective of this study was to provide evidence from a simple simulation. In patients with focal dystonia, an initial good response to botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections followed by a secondary worsening does not necessarily arise from an antibody-induced secondary treatment fail...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hefter, Harald, Rosenthal, Dietmar, Samadzadeh, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10610736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins15100618
_version_ 1785128327533559808
author Hefter, Harald
Rosenthal, Dietmar
Samadzadeh, Sara
author_facet Hefter, Harald
Rosenthal, Dietmar
Samadzadeh, Sara
author_sort Hefter, Harald
collection PubMed
description Background: The objective of this study was to provide evidence from a simple simulation. In patients with focal dystonia, an initial good response to botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections followed by a secondary worsening does not necessarily arise from an antibody-induced secondary treatment failure (NAB-STF), but may stem from a “pseudo”-secondary treatment failure (PSEUDO-STF). Methods: The simulation of the outcome after BoNT long-term treatment was performed in four steps: 1. The effect of the first single BoNT injection (SI curve) was displayed as a 12-point graph, corresponding to the mean improvement from weeks 1 to 12. 2. The remaining severity of the dystonia during the nth injection cycle was calculated by subtracting the SI curve (weighted by the outcome after n − 1 cycles) from the outcome after week 12 of the (n − 1)th cycle. 3. A graph was chosen (the PRO curve), which represents the progression of the severity of the underlying disease during BoNT therapy. 4. The interaction between the outcome during the nth BoNT cycle and the PRO curve was determined. Results: When the long-term outcome after n cycles of BoNT injections (applied every 3 months) was simulated as an interactive process, subtracting the effect of the first cycle (weighted by the outcome after n − 1 cycles) and adding the progression of the disease, an initial good improvement followed by secondary worsening results. This long-term outcome depends on the steepness of the progression and the duration of action of the first injection cycle. We termed this response behavior a “pseudo”-secondary treatment failure, as it can be compensated via a dose increase. Conclusion: A secondary worsening following an initial good response in BoNT therapy of focal dystonia might not necessarily indicate neutralizing antibody induction but could stem from a “PSEUDO”-STF (a combination of good response behavior and progression of the underlying disease). Thus, an adequate dose adaptation must be conducted before diagnosing a secondary treatment failure in the strict sense.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10610736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106107362023-10-28 “Pseudo”-Secondary Treatment Failure Explained via Disease Progression and Effective Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Pilot Simulation Study Hefter, Harald Rosenthal, Dietmar Samadzadeh, Sara Toxins (Basel) Article Background: The objective of this study was to provide evidence from a simple simulation. In patients with focal dystonia, an initial good response to botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections followed by a secondary worsening does not necessarily arise from an antibody-induced secondary treatment failure (NAB-STF), but may stem from a “pseudo”-secondary treatment failure (PSEUDO-STF). Methods: The simulation of the outcome after BoNT long-term treatment was performed in four steps: 1. The effect of the first single BoNT injection (SI curve) was displayed as a 12-point graph, corresponding to the mean improvement from weeks 1 to 12. 2. The remaining severity of the dystonia during the nth injection cycle was calculated by subtracting the SI curve (weighted by the outcome after n − 1 cycles) from the outcome after week 12 of the (n − 1)th cycle. 3. A graph was chosen (the PRO curve), which represents the progression of the severity of the underlying disease during BoNT therapy. 4. The interaction between the outcome during the nth BoNT cycle and the PRO curve was determined. Results: When the long-term outcome after n cycles of BoNT injections (applied every 3 months) was simulated as an interactive process, subtracting the effect of the first cycle (weighted by the outcome after n − 1 cycles) and adding the progression of the disease, an initial good improvement followed by secondary worsening results. This long-term outcome depends on the steepness of the progression and the duration of action of the first injection cycle. We termed this response behavior a “pseudo”-secondary treatment failure, as it can be compensated via a dose increase. Conclusion: A secondary worsening following an initial good response in BoNT therapy of focal dystonia might not necessarily indicate neutralizing antibody induction but could stem from a “PSEUDO”-STF (a combination of good response behavior and progression of the underlying disease). Thus, an adequate dose adaptation must be conducted before diagnosing a secondary treatment failure in the strict sense. MDPI 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10610736/ /pubmed/37888649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins15100618 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hefter, Harald
Rosenthal, Dietmar
Samadzadeh, Sara
“Pseudo”-Secondary Treatment Failure Explained via Disease Progression and Effective Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Pilot Simulation Study
title “Pseudo”-Secondary Treatment Failure Explained via Disease Progression and Effective Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Pilot Simulation Study
title_full “Pseudo”-Secondary Treatment Failure Explained via Disease Progression and Effective Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Pilot Simulation Study
title_fullStr “Pseudo”-Secondary Treatment Failure Explained via Disease Progression and Effective Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Pilot Simulation Study
title_full_unstemmed “Pseudo”-Secondary Treatment Failure Explained via Disease Progression and Effective Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Pilot Simulation Study
title_short “Pseudo”-Secondary Treatment Failure Explained via Disease Progression and Effective Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Pilot Simulation Study
title_sort “pseudo”-secondary treatment failure explained via disease progression and effective botulinum toxin therapy: a pilot simulation study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10610736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins15100618
work_keys_str_mv AT hefterharald pseudosecondarytreatmentfailureexplainedviadiseaseprogressionandeffectivebotulinumtoxintherapyapilotsimulationstudy
AT rosenthaldietmar pseudosecondarytreatmentfailureexplainedviadiseaseprogressionandeffectivebotulinumtoxintherapyapilotsimulationstudy
AT samadzadehsara pseudosecondarytreatmentfailureexplainedviadiseaseprogressionandeffectivebotulinumtoxintherapyapilotsimulationstudy