Cargando…
A Review on the Use of Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials: Quality Assurance Strategies for Technical Validation
Imaging biomarkers (IBs) have been proposed in medical literature that exploit images in a quantitative way, going beyond the visual assessment by an imaging physician. These IBs can be used in the diagnosis, prognosis, and response assessment of several pathologies and are very often used for patie...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10610870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888741 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9050149 |
_version_ | 1785128358456066048 |
---|---|
author | Chauvie, Stephane Mazzoni, Lorenzo Nicola O’Doherty, Jim |
author_facet | Chauvie, Stephane Mazzoni, Lorenzo Nicola O’Doherty, Jim |
author_sort | Chauvie, Stephane |
collection | PubMed |
description | Imaging biomarkers (IBs) have been proposed in medical literature that exploit images in a quantitative way, going beyond the visual assessment by an imaging physician. These IBs can be used in the diagnosis, prognosis, and response assessment of several pathologies and are very often used for patient management pathways. In this respect, IBs to be used in clinical practice and clinical trials have a requirement to be precise, accurate, and reproducible. Due to limitations in imaging technology, an error can be associated with their value when considering the entire imaging chain, from data acquisition to data reconstruction and subsequent analysis. From this point of view, the use of IBs in clinical trials requires a broadening of the concept of quality assurance and this can be a challenge for the responsible medical physics experts (MPEs). Within this manuscript, we describe the concept of an IB, examine some examples of IBs currently employed in clinical practice/clinical trials and analyze the procedure that should be carried out to achieve better accuracy and reproducibility in their use. We anticipate that this narrative review, written by the components of the EFOMP working group on “the role of the MPEs in clinical trials”-imaging sub-group, can represent a valid reference material for MPEs approaching the subject. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10610870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106108702023-10-28 A Review on the Use of Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials: Quality Assurance Strategies for Technical Validation Chauvie, Stephane Mazzoni, Lorenzo Nicola O’Doherty, Jim Tomography Review Imaging biomarkers (IBs) have been proposed in medical literature that exploit images in a quantitative way, going beyond the visual assessment by an imaging physician. These IBs can be used in the diagnosis, prognosis, and response assessment of several pathologies and are very often used for patient management pathways. In this respect, IBs to be used in clinical practice and clinical trials have a requirement to be precise, accurate, and reproducible. Due to limitations in imaging technology, an error can be associated with their value when considering the entire imaging chain, from data acquisition to data reconstruction and subsequent analysis. From this point of view, the use of IBs in clinical trials requires a broadening of the concept of quality assurance and this can be a challenge for the responsible medical physics experts (MPEs). Within this manuscript, we describe the concept of an IB, examine some examples of IBs currently employed in clinical practice/clinical trials and analyze the procedure that should be carried out to achieve better accuracy and reproducibility in their use. We anticipate that this narrative review, written by the components of the EFOMP working group on “the role of the MPEs in clinical trials”-imaging sub-group, can represent a valid reference material for MPEs approaching the subject. MDPI 2023-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10610870/ /pubmed/37888741 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9050149 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Chauvie, Stephane Mazzoni, Lorenzo Nicola O’Doherty, Jim A Review on the Use of Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials: Quality Assurance Strategies for Technical Validation |
title | A Review on the Use of Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials: Quality Assurance Strategies for Technical Validation |
title_full | A Review on the Use of Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials: Quality Assurance Strategies for Technical Validation |
title_fullStr | A Review on the Use of Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials: Quality Assurance Strategies for Technical Validation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review on the Use of Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials: Quality Assurance Strategies for Technical Validation |
title_short | A Review on the Use of Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials: Quality Assurance Strategies for Technical Validation |
title_sort | review on the use of imaging biomarkers in oncology clinical trials: quality assurance strategies for technical validation |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10610870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888741 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9050149 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chauviestephane areviewontheuseofimagingbiomarkersinoncologyclinicaltrialsqualityassurancestrategiesfortechnicalvalidation AT mazzonilorenzonicola areviewontheuseofimagingbiomarkersinoncologyclinicaltrialsqualityassurancestrategiesfortechnicalvalidation AT odohertyjim areviewontheuseofimagingbiomarkersinoncologyclinicaltrialsqualityassurancestrategiesfortechnicalvalidation AT chauviestephane reviewontheuseofimagingbiomarkersinoncologyclinicaltrialsqualityassurancestrategiesfortechnicalvalidation AT mazzonilorenzonicola reviewontheuseofimagingbiomarkersinoncologyclinicaltrialsqualityassurancestrategiesfortechnicalvalidation AT odohertyjim reviewontheuseofimagingbiomarkersinoncologyclinicaltrialsqualityassurancestrategiesfortechnicalvalidation |