Cargando…
Tensile Properties of Four Types of ABS Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study
This article aims to compare the behaviour of four types of lattice structures named Cartesian, Rhomboid, Octagonal, and Starlit under tensile stress loading. The structures were made of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) material using the Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) technique with three di...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37896334 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15204090 |
_version_ | 1785128403422150656 |
---|---|
author | Monkova, Katarina Monka, Peter Pavol Hricová, Romana Hausnerova, Berenika Knapčíková, Lucia |
author_facet | Monkova, Katarina Monka, Peter Pavol Hricová, Romana Hausnerova, Berenika Knapčíková, Lucia |
author_sort | Monkova, Katarina |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article aims to compare the behaviour of four types of lattice structures named Cartesian, Rhomboid, Octagonal, and Starlit under tensile stress loading. The structures were made of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) material using the Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) technique with three different specific volumes (24, 42, and 60%). Five samples of each type were produced, and a total of 60 samples were tested. Experimental testing was performed according to EN ISO 527-1:2012 and EN ISO 527-2:2012. The obtained data were statistically processed, while no outliers were identified. The experimental results pointed out that the specimens’ topology, together with the specific volume, very significantly affected the resultant ABS properties of the tested samples made of the same material. The comparative study showed that in terms of ultimate strength, yield strength, and Young’s modulus, the Cartesian structure appeared to be the most suitable for tensile stress, and the least suitable structure was the Rhomboid structure. On the other hand, the Rhomboid-type of the structure showed not only the highest amount of absorbed energy but also the highest toughness among the investigated lattice structures, so in the near future, its behaviour under an impact test should be studied. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10611063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106110632023-10-28 Tensile Properties of Four Types of ABS Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study Monkova, Katarina Monka, Peter Pavol Hricová, Romana Hausnerova, Berenika Knapčíková, Lucia Polymers (Basel) Article This article aims to compare the behaviour of four types of lattice structures named Cartesian, Rhomboid, Octagonal, and Starlit under tensile stress loading. The structures were made of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) material using the Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) technique with three different specific volumes (24, 42, and 60%). Five samples of each type were produced, and a total of 60 samples were tested. Experimental testing was performed according to EN ISO 527-1:2012 and EN ISO 527-2:2012. The obtained data were statistically processed, while no outliers were identified. The experimental results pointed out that the specimens’ topology, together with the specific volume, very significantly affected the resultant ABS properties of the tested samples made of the same material. The comparative study showed that in terms of ultimate strength, yield strength, and Young’s modulus, the Cartesian structure appeared to be the most suitable for tensile stress, and the least suitable structure was the Rhomboid structure. On the other hand, the Rhomboid-type of the structure showed not only the highest amount of absorbed energy but also the highest toughness among the investigated lattice structures, so in the near future, its behaviour under an impact test should be studied. MDPI 2023-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10611063/ /pubmed/37896334 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15204090 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Monkova, Katarina Monka, Peter Pavol Hricová, Romana Hausnerova, Berenika Knapčíková, Lucia Tensile Properties of Four Types of ABS Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study |
title | Tensile Properties of Four Types of ABS Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study |
title_full | Tensile Properties of Four Types of ABS Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Tensile Properties of Four Types of ABS Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Tensile Properties of Four Types of ABS Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study |
title_short | Tensile Properties of Four Types of ABS Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study |
title_sort | tensile properties of four types of abs lattice structures—a comparative study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37896334 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15204090 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monkovakatarina tensilepropertiesoffourtypesofabslatticestructuresacomparativestudy AT monkapeterpavol tensilepropertiesoffourtypesofabslatticestructuresacomparativestudy AT hricovaromana tensilepropertiesoffourtypesofabslatticestructuresacomparativestudy AT hausnerovaberenika tensilepropertiesoffourtypesofabslatticestructuresacomparativestudy AT knapcikovalucia tensilepropertiesoffourtypesofabslatticestructuresacomparativestudy |