Cargando…

Tensile Properties of Four Types of ABS Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study

This article aims to compare the behaviour of four types of lattice structures named Cartesian, Rhomboid, Octagonal, and Starlit under tensile stress loading. The structures were made of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) material using the Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) technique with three di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monkova, Katarina, Monka, Peter Pavol, Hricová, Romana, Hausnerova, Berenika, Knapčíková, Lucia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37896334
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15204090
_version_ 1785128403422150656
author Monkova, Katarina
Monka, Peter Pavol
Hricová, Romana
Hausnerova, Berenika
Knapčíková, Lucia
author_facet Monkova, Katarina
Monka, Peter Pavol
Hricová, Romana
Hausnerova, Berenika
Knapčíková, Lucia
author_sort Monkova, Katarina
collection PubMed
description This article aims to compare the behaviour of four types of lattice structures named Cartesian, Rhomboid, Octagonal, and Starlit under tensile stress loading. The structures were made of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) material using the Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) technique with three different specific volumes (24, 42, and 60%). Five samples of each type were produced, and a total of 60 samples were tested. Experimental testing was performed according to EN ISO 527-1:2012 and EN ISO 527-2:2012. The obtained data were statistically processed, while no outliers were identified. The experimental results pointed out that the specimens’ topology, together with the specific volume, very significantly affected the resultant ABS properties of the tested samples made of the same material. The comparative study showed that in terms of ultimate strength, yield strength, and Young’s modulus, the Cartesian structure appeared to be the most suitable for tensile stress, and the least suitable structure was the Rhomboid structure. On the other hand, the Rhomboid-type of the structure showed not only the highest amount of absorbed energy but also the highest toughness among the investigated lattice structures, so in the near future, its behaviour under an impact test should be studied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10611063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106110632023-10-28 Tensile Properties of Four Types of ABS Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study Monkova, Katarina Monka, Peter Pavol Hricová, Romana Hausnerova, Berenika Knapčíková, Lucia Polymers (Basel) Article This article aims to compare the behaviour of four types of lattice structures named Cartesian, Rhomboid, Octagonal, and Starlit under tensile stress loading. The structures were made of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) material using the Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) technique with three different specific volumes (24, 42, and 60%). Five samples of each type were produced, and a total of 60 samples were tested. Experimental testing was performed according to EN ISO 527-1:2012 and EN ISO 527-2:2012. The obtained data were statistically processed, while no outliers were identified. The experimental results pointed out that the specimens’ topology, together with the specific volume, very significantly affected the resultant ABS properties of the tested samples made of the same material. The comparative study showed that in terms of ultimate strength, yield strength, and Young’s modulus, the Cartesian structure appeared to be the most suitable for tensile stress, and the least suitable structure was the Rhomboid structure. On the other hand, the Rhomboid-type of the structure showed not only the highest amount of absorbed energy but also the highest toughness among the investigated lattice structures, so in the near future, its behaviour under an impact test should be studied. MDPI 2023-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10611063/ /pubmed/37896334 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15204090 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Monkova, Katarina
Monka, Peter Pavol
Hricová, Romana
Hausnerova, Berenika
Knapčíková, Lucia
Tensile Properties of Four Types of ABS Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study
title Tensile Properties of Four Types of ABS Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study
title_full Tensile Properties of Four Types of ABS Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Tensile Properties of Four Types of ABS Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Tensile Properties of Four Types of ABS Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study
title_short Tensile Properties of Four Types of ABS Lattice Structures—A Comparative Study
title_sort tensile properties of four types of abs lattice structures—a comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37896334
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15204090
work_keys_str_mv AT monkovakatarina tensilepropertiesoffourtypesofabslatticestructuresacomparativestudy
AT monkapeterpavol tensilepropertiesoffourtypesofabslatticestructuresacomparativestudy
AT hricovaromana tensilepropertiesoffourtypesofabslatticestructuresacomparativestudy
AT hausnerovaberenika tensilepropertiesoffourtypesofabslatticestructuresacomparativestudy
AT knapcikovalucia tensilepropertiesoffourtypesofabslatticestructuresacomparativestudy