Cargando…

Experimental Study on Calibration of Amplitude-Frequency Measurement Deviation for Microseismic Sensors in Coal Mines

Microseismic monitoring systems (MMS) have become increasingly crucial in detecting tremors in coal mining. Microseismic sensors (MS), integral components of MMS, profoundly influence positioning accuracy and energy calculations. Hence, calibrating these sensors holds immense importance. To bridge t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Zepeng, Dou, Linming, Mu, Zonglong, Cao, Jinrong, Chai, Yanjiang, Chen, Shuai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37896514
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23208420
_version_ 1785128433715511296
author Han, Zepeng
Dou, Linming
Mu, Zonglong
Cao, Jinrong
Chai, Yanjiang
Chen, Shuai
author_facet Han, Zepeng
Dou, Linming
Mu, Zonglong
Cao, Jinrong
Chai, Yanjiang
Chen, Shuai
author_sort Han, Zepeng
collection PubMed
description Microseismic monitoring systems (MMS) have become increasingly crucial in detecting tremors in coal mining. Microseismic sensors (MS), integral components of MMS, profoundly influence positioning accuracy and energy calculations. Hence, calibrating these sensors holds immense importance. To bridge the research gap in MS calibration, this study conducted a systematic investigation. The main conclusions are as follows: based on calibration tests on 102 old MS using the CS18VLF vibration table, it became evident that certain long-used MS in coal mines exhibited significant deviations in frequency and amplitude measurements, indicating sensor failure. Three important calibration indexes, frequency deviation, amplitude deviation, and amplitude linearity are proposed to assess the performance of MS. By comparing the index of old and new MS, critical threshold values were established to evaluate sensor effectiveness. A well-functioning MS exhibits an absolute frequency deviation below 5%, an absolute amplitude deviation within 55%, and amplitude linearity surpassing 0.95. In normal operations, the frequency deviation of MS is significantly smaller than the amplitude deviation. Simplified waveform analysis has unveiled a linear connection between amplitude deviation and localization results. An analysis of the Gutenberg–Richter microseismic energy calculation formula found that the microseismic energy calculation is influenced by both the localization result and amplitude deviation, making it challenging to pinpoint the exact impact of amplitude deviation on microseismic energy. Reliable MS, as well as a robust MS, serve as the fundamental cornerstone for acquiring dependable microseismic data and are essential prerequisites for subsequent microseismic data mining. The insights and findings presented here provide valuable guidance for future MS calibration endeavors and ultimately can guarantee the dependability of microseismic data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10611192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106111922023-10-28 Experimental Study on Calibration of Amplitude-Frequency Measurement Deviation for Microseismic Sensors in Coal Mines Han, Zepeng Dou, Linming Mu, Zonglong Cao, Jinrong Chai, Yanjiang Chen, Shuai Sensors (Basel) Article Microseismic monitoring systems (MMS) have become increasingly crucial in detecting tremors in coal mining. Microseismic sensors (MS), integral components of MMS, profoundly influence positioning accuracy and energy calculations. Hence, calibrating these sensors holds immense importance. To bridge the research gap in MS calibration, this study conducted a systematic investigation. The main conclusions are as follows: based on calibration tests on 102 old MS using the CS18VLF vibration table, it became evident that certain long-used MS in coal mines exhibited significant deviations in frequency and amplitude measurements, indicating sensor failure. Three important calibration indexes, frequency deviation, amplitude deviation, and amplitude linearity are proposed to assess the performance of MS. By comparing the index of old and new MS, critical threshold values were established to evaluate sensor effectiveness. A well-functioning MS exhibits an absolute frequency deviation below 5%, an absolute amplitude deviation within 55%, and amplitude linearity surpassing 0.95. In normal operations, the frequency deviation of MS is significantly smaller than the amplitude deviation. Simplified waveform analysis has unveiled a linear connection between amplitude deviation and localization results. An analysis of the Gutenberg–Richter microseismic energy calculation formula found that the microseismic energy calculation is influenced by both the localization result and amplitude deviation, making it challenging to pinpoint the exact impact of amplitude deviation on microseismic energy. Reliable MS, as well as a robust MS, serve as the fundamental cornerstone for acquiring dependable microseismic data and are essential prerequisites for subsequent microseismic data mining. The insights and findings presented here provide valuable guidance for future MS calibration endeavors and ultimately can guarantee the dependability of microseismic data. MDPI 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10611192/ /pubmed/37896514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23208420 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Han, Zepeng
Dou, Linming
Mu, Zonglong
Cao, Jinrong
Chai, Yanjiang
Chen, Shuai
Experimental Study on Calibration of Amplitude-Frequency Measurement Deviation for Microseismic Sensors in Coal Mines
title Experimental Study on Calibration of Amplitude-Frequency Measurement Deviation for Microseismic Sensors in Coal Mines
title_full Experimental Study on Calibration of Amplitude-Frequency Measurement Deviation for Microseismic Sensors in Coal Mines
title_fullStr Experimental Study on Calibration of Amplitude-Frequency Measurement Deviation for Microseismic Sensors in Coal Mines
title_full_unstemmed Experimental Study on Calibration of Amplitude-Frequency Measurement Deviation for Microseismic Sensors in Coal Mines
title_short Experimental Study on Calibration of Amplitude-Frequency Measurement Deviation for Microseismic Sensors in Coal Mines
title_sort experimental study on calibration of amplitude-frequency measurement deviation for microseismic sensors in coal mines
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37896514
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23208420
work_keys_str_mv AT hanzepeng experimentalstudyoncalibrationofamplitudefrequencymeasurementdeviationformicroseismicsensorsincoalmines
AT doulinming experimentalstudyoncalibrationofamplitudefrequencymeasurementdeviationformicroseismicsensorsincoalmines
AT muzonglong experimentalstudyoncalibrationofamplitudefrequencymeasurementdeviationformicroseismicsensorsincoalmines
AT caojinrong experimentalstudyoncalibrationofamplitudefrequencymeasurementdeviationformicroseismicsensorsincoalmines
AT chaiyanjiang experimentalstudyoncalibrationofamplitudefrequencymeasurementdeviationformicroseismicsensorsincoalmines
AT chenshuai experimentalstudyoncalibrationofamplitudefrequencymeasurementdeviationformicroseismicsensorsincoalmines