Cargando…
Clinical performance and health equity implications of the American Diabetes Association’s 2023 screening recommendation for prediabetes and diabetes
INTRODUCTION: The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends screening for prediabetes and diabetes (dysglycemia) starting at age 35, or younger than 35 years among adults with overweight or obesity and other risk factors. Diabetes risk differs by sex, race, and ethnicity, but performance of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37900145 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1279348 |
_version_ | 1785128501510144000 |
---|---|
author | O’Brien, Matthew J. Zhang, Yan Bailey, Stacy C. Khan, Sadiya S. Ackermann, Ronald T. Ali, Mohammed K. Bowen, Michael E. Benoit, Stephen R. Imperatore, Giuseppina Holliday, Christopher S. McKeever Bullard, Kai |
author_facet | O’Brien, Matthew J. Zhang, Yan Bailey, Stacy C. Khan, Sadiya S. Ackermann, Ronald T. Ali, Mohammed K. Bowen, Michael E. Benoit, Stephen R. Imperatore, Giuseppina Holliday, Christopher S. McKeever Bullard, Kai |
author_sort | O’Brien, Matthew J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends screening for prediabetes and diabetes (dysglycemia) starting at age 35, or younger than 35 years among adults with overweight or obesity and other risk factors. Diabetes risk differs by sex, race, and ethnicity, but performance of the recommendation in these sociodemographic subgroups is unknown. METHODS: Nationally representative data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (2015-March 2020) were analyzed from 5,287 nonpregnant US adults without diagnosed diabetes. Screening eligibility was based on age, measured body mass index, and the presence of diabetes risk factors. Dysglycemia was defined by fasting plasma glucose ≥100mg/dL (≥5.6 mmol/L) or haemoglobin A1c ≥5.7% (≥39mmol/mol). The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the ADA screening criteria were examined by sex, race, and ethnicity. RESULTS: An estimated 83.1% (95% CI=81.2-84.7) of US adults were eligible for screening according to the 2023 ADA recommendation. Overall, ADA’s screening criteria exhibited high sensitivity [95.0% (95% CI=92.7-96.6)] and low specificity [27.1% (95% CI=24.5-29.9)], which did not differ by race or ethnicity. Sensitivity was higher among women [97.8% (95% CI=96.6-98.6)] than men [92.4% (95% CI=88.3-95.1)]. Racial and ethnic differences in sensitivity and specificity among men were statistically significant (P=0.04 and P=0.02, respectively). Among women, guideline performance did not differ by race and ethnicity. DISCUSSION: The ADA screening criteria exhibited high sensitivity for all groups and was marginally higher in women than men. Racial and ethnic differences in guideline performance among men were small and unlikely to have a significant impact on health equity. Future research could examine adoption of this recommendation in practice and examine its effects on treatment and clinical outcomes by sex, race, and ethnicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10611495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106114952023-10-28 Clinical performance and health equity implications of the American Diabetes Association’s 2023 screening recommendation for prediabetes and diabetes O’Brien, Matthew J. Zhang, Yan Bailey, Stacy C. Khan, Sadiya S. Ackermann, Ronald T. Ali, Mohammed K. Bowen, Michael E. Benoit, Stephen R. Imperatore, Giuseppina Holliday, Christopher S. McKeever Bullard, Kai Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology INTRODUCTION: The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends screening for prediabetes and diabetes (dysglycemia) starting at age 35, or younger than 35 years among adults with overweight or obesity and other risk factors. Diabetes risk differs by sex, race, and ethnicity, but performance of the recommendation in these sociodemographic subgroups is unknown. METHODS: Nationally representative data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (2015-March 2020) were analyzed from 5,287 nonpregnant US adults without diagnosed diabetes. Screening eligibility was based on age, measured body mass index, and the presence of diabetes risk factors. Dysglycemia was defined by fasting plasma glucose ≥100mg/dL (≥5.6 mmol/L) or haemoglobin A1c ≥5.7% (≥39mmol/mol). The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the ADA screening criteria were examined by sex, race, and ethnicity. RESULTS: An estimated 83.1% (95% CI=81.2-84.7) of US adults were eligible for screening according to the 2023 ADA recommendation. Overall, ADA’s screening criteria exhibited high sensitivity [95.0% (95% CI=92.7-96.6)] and low specificity [27.1% (95% CI=24.5-29.9)], which did not differ by race or ethnicity. Sensitivity was higher among women [97.8% (95% CI=96.6-98.6)] than men [92.4% (95% CI=88.3-95.1)]. Racial and ethnic differences in sensitivity and specificity among men were statistically significant (P=0.04 and P=0.02, respectively). Among women, guideline performance did not differ by race and ethnicity. DISCUSSION: The ADA screening criteria exhibited high sensitivity for all groups and was marginally higher in women than men. Racial and ethnic differences in guideline performance among men were small and unlikely to have a significant impact on health equity. Future research could examine adoption of this recommendation in practice and examine its effects on treatment and clinical outcomes by sex, race, and ethnicity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10611495/ /pubmed/37900145 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1279348 Text en Copyright © 2023 O’Brien, Zhang, Bailey, Khan, Ackermann, Ali, Bowen, Benoit, Imperatore, Holliday and McKeever Bullard https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology O’Brien, Matthew J. Zhang, Yan Bailey, Stacy C. Khan, Sadiya S. Ackermann, Ronald T. Ali, Mohammed K. Bowen, Michael E. Benoit, Stephen R. Imperatore, Giuseppina Holliday, Christopher S. McKeever Bullard, Kai Clinical performance and health equity implications of the American Diabetes Association’s 2023 screening recommendation for prediabetes and diabetes |
title | Clinical performance and health equity implications of the American Diabetes Association’s 2023 screening recommendation for prediabetes and diabetes |
title_full | Clinical performance and health equity implications of the American Diabetes Association’s 2023 screening recommendation for prediabetes and diabetes |
title_fullStr | Clinical performance and health equity implications of the American Diabetes Association’s 2023 screening recommendation for prediabetes and diabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical performance and health equity implications of the American Diabetes Association’s 2023 screening recommendation for prediabetes and diabetes |
title_short | Clinical performance and health equity implications of the American Diabetes Association’s 2023 screening recommendation for prediabetes and diabetes |
title_sort | clinical performance and health equity implications of the american diabetes association’s 2023 screening recommendation for prediabetes and diabetes |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37900145 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1279348 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT obrienmatthewj clinicalperformanceandhealthequityimplicationsoftheamericandiabetesassociations2023screeningrecommendationforprediabetesanddiabetes AT zhangyan clinicalperformanceandhealthequityimplicationsoftheamericandiabetesassociations2023screeningrecommendationforprediabetesanddiabetes AT baileystacyc clinicalperformanceandhealthequityimplicationsoftheamericandiabetesassociations2023screeningrecommendationforprediabetesanddiabetes AT khansadiyas clinicalperformanceandhealthequityimplicationsoftheamericandiabetesassociations2023screeningrecommendationforprediabetesanddiabetes AT ackermannronaldt clinicalperformanceandhealthequityimplicationsoftheamericandiabetesassociations2023screeningrecommendationforprediabetesanddiabetes AT alimohammedk clinicalperformanceandhealthequityimplicationsoftheamericandiabetesassociations2023screeningrecommendationforprediabetesanddiabetes AT bowenmichaele clinicalperformanceandhealthequityimplicationsoftheamericandiabetesassociations2023screeningrecommendationforprediabetesanddiabetes AT benoitstephenr clinicalperformanceandhealthequityimplicationsoftheamericandiabetesassociations2023screeningrecommendationforprediabetesanddiabetes AT imperatoregiuseppina clinicalperformanceandhealthequityimplicationsoftheamericandiabetesassociations2023screeningrecommendationforprediabetesanddiabetes AT hollidaychristophers clinicalperformanceandhealthequityimplicationsoftheamericandiabetesassociations2023screeningrecommendationforprediabetesanddiabetes AT mckeeverbullardkai clinicalperformanceandhealthequityimplicationsoftheamericandiabetesassociations2023screeningrecommendationforprediabetesanddiabetes |