Cargando…
Comments on recent community water fluoridation studies
Water fluoridation is a public health measure to reduce levels of dental caries in populations. A report of the recently completed CATFISH study has been published. This was the first UK evaluation of fluoridation introduction for many years; it was carefully designed and executed and is welcomed. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37891303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023-6338-z |
_version_ | 1785128517527142400 |
---|---|
author | Hearnshaw, Simon Cockcroft, Barry Rugg-Gunn, Andrew Morris, A. John Lowry, Raymond J. Beal, John Johnson, Johnny Jacob, Matt |
author_facet | Hearnshaw, Simon Cockcroft, Barry Rugg-Gunn, Andrew Morris, A. John Lowry, Raymond J. Beal, John Johnson, Johnny Jacob, Matt |
author_sort | Hearnshaw, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Water fluoridation is a public health measure to reduce levels of dental caries in populations. A report of the recently completed CATFISH study has been published. This was the first UK evaluation of fluoridation introduction for many years; it was carefully designed and executed and is welcomed. The purpose of this article is to highlight the 180-page report of the study and comment on some aspects to aid interpretation of the findings. Significant features were that two cohorts, from birth and from five years, were followed for six years in a fluoridated and a non-fluoridated area, and clinical and cost analyses were reported. Areas of the report which deserve comment are: a) interruption of fluoridation for a year for half the children in the intervention area and its effect; b) clinical results were reported as absolute reduction in caries prevalence, with the preventive fraction for caries severity downplayed; c) the power of the study was diminished by an unexpected lower caries increment; and d) control for differences in diet was not possible. Nevertheless, this major UK study showed clinical and cost benefits of water fluoridation. The risk of cessation of water fluoridation is highlighted in examples of three recently published studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10611565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106115652023-10-29 Comments on recent community water fluoridation studies Hearnshaw, Simon Cockcroft, Barry Rugg-Gunn, Andrew Morris, A. John Lowry, Raymond J. Beal, John Johnson, Johnny Jacob, Matt Br Dent J General Water fluoridation is a public health measure to reduce levels of dental caries in populations. A report of the recently completed CATFISH study has been published. This was the first UK evaluation of fluoridation introduction for many years; it was carefully designed and executed and is welcomed. The purpose of this article is to highlight the 180-page report of the study and comment on some aspects to aid interpretation of the findings. Significant features were that two cohorts, from birth and from five years, were followed for six years in a fluoridated and a non-fluoridated area, and clinical and cost analyses were reported. Areas of the report which deserve comment are: a) interruption of fluoridation for a year for half the children in the intervention area and its effect; b) clinical results were reported as absolute reduction in caries prevalence, with the preventive fraction for caries severity downplayed; c) the power of the study was diminished by an unexpected lower caries increment; and d) control for differences in diet was not possible. Nevertheless, this major UK study showed clinical and cost benefits of water fluoridation. The risk of cessation of water fluoridation is highlighted in examples of three recently published studies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10611565/ /pubmed/37891303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023-6338-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .© The Author(s) 2023 |
spellingShingle | General Hearnshaw, Simon Cockcroft, Barry Rugg-Gunn, Andrew Morris, A. John Lowry, Raymond J. Beal, John Johnson, Johnny Jacob, Matt Comments on recent community water fluoridation studies |
title | Comments on recent community water fluoridation studies |
title_full | Comments on recent community water fluoridation studies |
title_fullStr | Comments on recent community water fluoridation studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Comments on recent community water fluoridation studies |
title_short | Comments on recent community water fluoridation studies |
title_sort | comments on recent community water fluoridation studies |
topic | General |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37891303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023-6338-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hearnshawsimon commentsonrecentcommunitywaterfluoridationstudies AT cockcroftbarry commentsonrecentcommunitywaterfluoridationstudies AT rugggunnandrew commentsonrecentcommunitywaterfluoridationstudies AT morrisajohn commentsonrecentcommunitywaterfluoridationstudies AT lowryraymondj commentsonrecentcommunitywaterfluoridationstudies AT bealjohn commentsonrecentcommunitywaterfluoridationstudies AT johnsonjohnny commentsonrecentcommunitywaterfluoridationstudies AT jacobmatt commentsonrecentcommunitywaterfluoridationstudies |