Cargando…

Meta-analytic prevalence of comorbid mental disorders in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis: the case for transdiagnostic assessment

Comorbid mental disorders in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) may impact preventive care. We conducted a PRISMA/MOOSE-compliant systematic meta-analysis, searching PubMed/PsycInfo up to June 21st, 2021 for observational studies/randomized controlled trials reporting on comorbid D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solmi, Marco, Soardo, Livia, Kaur, Simi, Azis, Matilda, Cabras, Anna, Censori, Marco, Fausti, Luigi, Besana, Filippo, Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo, Fusar-Poli, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-02029-8
_version_ 1785128518224445440
author Solmi, Marco
Soardo, Livia
Kaur, Simi
Azis, Matilda
Cabras, Anna
Censori, Marco
Fausti, Luigi
Besana, Filippo
Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo
Fusar-Poli, Paolo
author_facet Solmi, Marco
Soardo, Livia
Kaur, Simi
Azis, Matilda
Cabras, Anna
Censori, Marco
Fausti, Luigi
Besana, Filippo
Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo
Fusar-Poli, Paolo
author_sort Solmi, Marco
collection PubMed
description Comorbid mental disorders in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) may impact preventive care. We conducted a PRISMA/MOOSE-compliant systematic meta-analysis, searching PubMed/PsycInfo up to June 21st, 2021 for observational studies/randomized controlled trials reporting on comorbid DSM/ICD-mental disorders in CHR-P subjects (protocol). The primary and secondary outcomes were baseline and follow-up prevalence of comorbid mental disorders. We also explored the association of comorbid mental disorders compared with CHR-P versus psychotic/non-psychotic control groups, their impact on baseline functioning and transition to psychosis. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses, meta-regression, and assessed heterogeneity/publication bias/quality (Newcastle Ottawa Scale, NOS). We included 312 studies (largest meta-analyzed sample = 7834, any anxiety disorder, mean age = 19.98 (3.40), females = 43.88%, overall NOS > 6 in 77.6% of studies). The prevalence was 0.78 (95% CI = 0.73–0.82, k = 29) for any comorbid non-psychotic mental disorder, 0.60 (95% CI = 0.36–0.84, k = 3) for anxiety/mood disorders, 0.44 (95% CI = 0.39–0.49, k = 48) for any mood disorders, 0.38 (95% CI = 0.33–0.42, k = 50) for any depressive disorder/episode, 0.34 (95% CI = 0.30–0.38, k = 69) for any anxiety disorder, 0.30 (95% CI 0.25–0.35, k = 35) for major depressive disorders, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.08–0.51, k = 3) for any trauma-related disorder, 0.23 (95% CI = 0.17–0.28, k = 24) for any personality disorder, and <0.23 in other mental disorders (I(2) > 50% in 71.01% estimates). The prevalence of any comorbid mental disorder decreased over time (0.51, 95% CI = 0.25–0.77 over 96 months), except any substance use which increased (0.19, 95% CI = 0.00–0.39, k = 2, >96 months). Compared with controls, the CHR-P status was associated with a higher prevalence of anxiety, schizotypal personality, panic, and alcohol use disorders (OR from 2.90 to 1.54 versus without psychosis), a higher prevalence of anxiety/mood disorders (OR = 9.30 to 2.02) and lower prevalence of any substance use disorder (OR = 0.41, versus psychosis). Higher baseline prevalence of alcohol use disorder/schizotypal personality disorder was negatively associated with baseline functioning (beta from −0.40 to −0.15), while dysthymic disorder/generalized anxiety disorder with higher functioning (beta 0.59 to 1.49). Higher baseline prevalence of any mood disorder/generalized anxiety disorder/agoraphobia (beta from −2.39 to −0.27) was negatively associated with transition to psychosis. In conclusion, over three-quarters of CHR-P subjects have comorbid mental disorders, which modulate baseline functionig and transition to psychosis. Transdiagnostic mental health assessment should be warranted in subjects at CHR-P.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10611568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106115682023-10-29 Meta-analytic prevalence of comorbid mental disorders in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis: the case for transdiagnostic assessment Solmi, Marco Soardo, Livia Kaur, Simi Azis, Matilda Cabras, Anna Censori, Marco Fausti, Luigi Besana, Filippo Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo Fusar-Poli, Paolo Mol Psychiatry Systematic Review Comorbid mental disorders in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) may impact preventive care. We conducted a PRISMA/MOOSE-compliant systematic meta-analysis, searching PubMed/PsycInfo up to June 21st, 2021 for observational studies/randomized controlled trials reporting on comorbid DSM/ICD-mental disorders in CHR-P subjects (protocol). The primary and secondary outcomes were baseline and follow-up prevalence of comorbid mental disorders. We also explored the association of comorbid mental disorders compared with CHR-P versus psychotic/non-psychotic control groups, their impact on baseline functioning and transition to psychosis. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses, meta-regression, and assessed heterogeneity/publication bias/quality (Newcastle Ottawa Scale, NOS). We included 312 studies (largest meta-analyzed sample = 7834, any anxiety disorder, mean age = 19.98 (3.40), females = 43.88%, overall NOS > 6 in 77.6% of studies). The prevalence was 0.78 (95% CI = 0.73–0.82, k = 29) for any comorbid non-psychotic mental disorder, 0.60 (95% CI = 0.36–0.84, k = 3) for anxiety/mood disorders, 0.44 (95% CI = 0.39–0.49, k = 48) for any mood disorders, 0.38 (95% CI = 0.33–0.42, k = 50) for any depressive disorder/episode, 0.34 (95% CI = 0.30–0.38, k = 69) for any anxiety disorder, 0.30 (95% CI 0.25–0.35, k = 35) for major depressive disorders, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.08–0.51, k = 3) for any trauma-related disorder, 0.23 (95% CI = 0.17–0.28, k = 24) for any personality disorder, and <0.23 in other mental disorders (I(2) > 50% in 71.01% estimates). The prevalence of any comorbid mental disorder decreased over time (0.51, 95% CI = 0.25–0.77 over 96 months), except any substance use which increased (0.19, 95% CI = 0.00–0.39, k = 2, >96 months). Compared with controls, the CHR-P status was associated with a higher prevalence of anxiety, schizotypal personality, panic, and alcohol use disorders (OR from 2.90 to 1.54 versus without psychosis), a higher prevalence of anxiety/mood disorders (OR = 9.30 to 2.02) and lower prevalence of any substance use disorder (OR = 0.41, versus psychosis). Higher baseline prevalence of alcohol use disorder/schizotypal personality disorder was negatively associated with baseline functioning (beta from −0.40 to −0.15), while dysthymic disorder/generalized anxiety disorder with higher functioning (beta 0.59 to 1.49). Higher baseline prevalence of any mood disorder/generalized anxiety disorder/agoraphobia (beta from −2.39 to −0.27) was negatively associated with transition to psychosis. In conclusion, over three-quarters of CHR-P subjects have comorbid mental disorders, which modulate baseline functionig and transition to psychosis. Transdiagnostic mental health assessment should be warranted in subjects at CHR-P. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10611568/ /pubmed/37296309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-02029-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Solmi, Marco
Soardo, Livia
Kaur, Simi
Azis, Matilda
Cabras, Anna
Censori, Marco
Fausti, Luigi
Besana, Filippo
Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo
Fusar-Poli, Paolo
Meta-analytic prevalence of comorbid mental disorders in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis: the case for transdiagnostic assessment
title Meta-analytic prevalence of comorbid mental disorders in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis: the case for transdiagnostic assessment
title_full Meta-analytic prevalence of comorbid mental disorders in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis: the case for transdiagnostic assessment
title_fullStr Meta-analytic prevalence of comorbid mental disorders in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis: the case for transdiagnostic assessment
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analytic prevalence of comorbid mental disorders in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis: the case for transdiagnostic assessment
title_short Meta-analytic prevalence of comorbid mental disorders in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis: the case for transdiagnostic assessment
title_sort meta-analytic prevalence of comorbid mental disorders in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis: the case for transdiagnostic assessment
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37296309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-02029-8
work_keys_str_mv AT solmimarco metaanalyticprevalenceofcomorbidmentaldisordersinindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisthecasefortransdiagnosticassessment
AT soardolivia metaanalyticprevalenceofcomorbidmentaldisordersinindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisthecasefortransdiagnosticassessment
AT kaursimi metaanalyticprevalenceofcomorbidmentaldisordersinindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisthecasefortransdiagnosticassessment
AT azismatilda metaanalyticprevalenceofcomorbidmentaldisordersinindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisthecasefortransdiagnosticassessment
AT cabrasanna metaanalyticprevalenceofcomorbidmentaldisordersinindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisthecasefortransdiagnosticassessment
AT censorimarco metaanalyticprevalenceofcomorbidmentaldisordersinindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisthecasefortransdiagnosticassessment
AT faustiluigi metaanalyticprevalenceofcomorbidmentaldisordersinindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisthecasefortransdiagnosticassessment
AT besanafilippo metaanalyticprevalenceofcomorbidmentaldisordersinindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisthecasefortransdiagnosticassessment
AT salazardepablogonzalo metaanalyticprevalenceofcomorbidmentaldisordersinindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisthecasefortransdiagnosticassessment
AT fusarpolipaolo metaanalyticprevalenceofcomorbidmentaldisordersinindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisthecasefortransdiagnosticassessment