Cargando…

Economic Evaluation of a Bioinductive Implant for the Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears Compared with Standard Surgery in Italy

INTRODUCTION: Rotator cuff tear (RCT) is a painful, progressive condition resulting from damage to the rotator cuff tendons and is the leading cause of shoulder-related disability. Surgical repair of rotator cuff is an established standard of care (SOC); however, failure of the procedure can occur....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rognoni, Carla, Nherera, Leo M., Garofalo, Raffaele, Guerra, Enrico, Longo, Umile Giuseppe, Taverna, Ettore, Tarricone, Rosanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37759150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02686-9
_version_ 1785128524742393856
author Rognoni, Carla
Nherera, Leo M.
Garofalo, Raffaele
Guerra, Enrico
Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Taverna, Ettore
Tarricone, Rosanna
author_facet Rognoni, Carla
Nherera, Leo M.
Garofalo, Raffaele
Guerra, Enrico
Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Taverna, Ettore
Tarricone, Rosanna
author_sort Rognoni, Carla
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Rotator cuff tear (RCT) is a painful, progressive condition resulting from damage to the rotator cuff tendons and is the leading cause of shoulder-related disability. Surgical repair of rotator cuff is an established standard of care (SOC); however, failure of the procedure can occur. In this context, the use of collagen-based bioinductive implant REGENETEN showed long-term improvements in clinical scores. The aim of the study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of REGENETEN combined with SOC (SOC + REGENETEN) compared to SOC alone from both National Healthcare Service (NHS) and societal perspectives in Italy. METHODS: A decision analytic model was developed to estimate the number of tears healed and costs for the two considered treatment strategies over 1 year. Clinical data were retrieved from the literature, and the clinical pathways for the management of patients with RCTs were retrieved from four key opinion leaders in Italy. RESULTS: Over a 1-year time horizon, healed lesions were 90.70% and 72.90% for surgical repair of RCTs with and without REGENETEN, respectively. Considering the NHS perspective, mean costs per patient were €7828 and €4650 for the two strategies, respectively, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €17,857 per healed tear. From the societal perspective, the mean costs per patient were €12,659 for SOC and €11,784 for REGENETEN, thus showing savings of €4918 per healed tear when the bioinductive implant is used. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the model results. CONCLUSION: In the context of paucity of cost-effectiveness studies, our findings provide additional evidence for clinicians and payers regarding the value of a new treatment option that supports a tailored approach for the management of patients with RCTs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-023-02686-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10611596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106115962023-10-29 Economic Evaluation of a Bioinductive Implant for the Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears Compared with Standard Surgery in Italy Rognoni, Carla Nherera, Leo M. Garofalo, Raffaele Guerra, Enrico Longo, Umile Giuseppe Taverna, Ettore Tarricone, Rosanna Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Rotator cuff tear (RCT) is a painful, progressive condition resulting from damage to the rotator cuff tendons and is the leading cause of shoulder-related disability. Surgical repair of rotator cuff is an established standard of care (SOC); however, failure of the procedure can occur. In this context, the use of collagen-based bioinductive implant REGENETEN showed long-term improvements in clinical scores. The aim of the study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of REGENETEN combined with SOC (SOC + REGENETEN) compared to SOC alone from both National Healthcare Service (NHS) and societal perspectives in Italy. METHODS: A decision analytic model was developed to estimate the number of tears healed and costs for the two considered treatment strategies over 1 year. Clinical data were retrieved from the literature, and the clinical pathways for the management of patients with RCTs were retrieved from four key opinion leaders in Italy. RESULTS: Over a 1-year time horizon, healed lesions were 90.70% and 72.90% for surgical repair of RCTs with and without REGENETEN, respectively. Considering the NHS perspective, mean costs per patient were €7828 and €4650 for the two strategies, respectively, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €17,857 per healed tear. From the societal perspective, the mean costs per patient were €12,659 for SOC and €11,784 for REGENETEN, thus showing savings of €4918 per healed tear when the bioinductive implant is used. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the model results. CONCLUSION: In the context of paucity of cost-effectiveness studies, our findings provide additional evidence for clinicians and payers regarding the value of a new treatment option that supports a tailored approach for the management of patients with RCTs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-023-02686-9. Springer Healthcare 2023-09-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10611596/ /pubmed/37759150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02686-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Rognoni, Carla
Nherera, Leo M.
Garofalo, Raffaele
Guerra, Enrico
Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Taverna, Ettore
Tarricone, Rosanna
Economic Evaluation of a Bioinductive Implant for the Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears Compared with Standard Surgery in Italy
title Economic Evaluation of a Bioinductive Implant for the Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears Compared with Standard Surgery in Italy
title_full Economic Evaluation of a Bioinductive Implant for the Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears Compared with Standard Surgery in Italy
title_fullStr Economic Evaluation of a Bioinductive Implant for the Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears Compared with Standard Surgery in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Economic Evaluation of a Bioinductive Implant for the Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears Compared with Standard Surgery in Italy
title_short Economic Evaluation of a Bioinductive Implant for the Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears Compared with Standard Surgery in Italy
title_sort economic evaluation of a bioinductive implant for the repair of rotator cuff tears compared with standard surgery in italy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37759150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02686-9
work_keys_str_mv AT rognonicarla economicevaluationofabioinductiveimplantfortherepairofrotatorcufftearscomparedwithstandardsurgeryinitaly
AT nhereraleom economicevaluationofabioinductiveimplantfortherepairofrotatorcufftearscomparedwithstandardsurgeryinitaly
AT garofaloraffaele economicevaluationofabioinductiveimplantfortherepairofrotatorcufftearscomparedwithstandardsurgeryinitaly
AT guerraenrico economicevaluationofabioinductiveimplantfortherepairofrotatorcufftearscomparedwithstandardsurgeryinitaly
AT longoumilegiuseppe economicevaluationofabioinductiveimplantfortherepairofrotatorcufftearscomparedwithstandardsurgeryinitaly
AT tavernaettore economicevaluationofabioinductiveimplantfortherepairofrotatorcufftearscomparedwithstandardsurgeryinitaly
AT tarriconerosanna economicevaluationofabioinductiveimplantfortherepairofrotatorcufftearscomparedwithstandardsurgeryinitaly