Cargando…
Variability of [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reporting in vascular graft and endograft infection
PURPOSE: (18)F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography with low dose and/or contrast enhanced computed tomography ([(18)F]FDG-PET/CT) scan reveals high sensitivity for the diagnosis of vascular graft and endograft infection (VGEI), but lower specificity. Reporting [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT scans...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06349-3 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: (18)F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography with low dose and/or contrast enhanced computed tomography ([(18)F]FDG-PET/CT) scan reveals high sensitivity for the diagnosis of vascular graft and endograft infection (VGEI), but lower specificity. Reporting [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT scans of suspected VGEI is challenging, reader dependent, and reporting standards are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate variability of [(18)F]FDG-PET/low dose CT (LDCT) reporting of suspected VGEI using a proposed standard reporting format. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all patients with a suspected VGEI (according to the MAGIC criteria) without need for urgent surgical treatment who underwent an additional [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT scan between 2006 and 2022 at a tertiary referral centre. All [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reports were scored following pre-selected criteria that were formulated based on literature and experts in the field. The aim was to investigate the completeness of [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reports for diagnosing VGEI (proven according to the MAGIC criteria) and to evaluate if incompleteness of reports influenced the diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Hundred-fifty-two patients were included. Median diagnostic interval from the index vascular surgical procedure until [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT scan was 35.5 (7.3–73.3) months. Grafts were in 65.1% located centrally and 34.9% peripherally. Based on the pre-selected reporting criteria, 45.7% of the reports included all items. The least frequently assessed criterion was FDG-uptake pattern (40.6%). Overall, [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT showed a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 72%, and an accuracy of 88% when compared to the gold standard (diagnosed VGEI). Lower sensitivity and specificity in reports including ≤ 8 criteria compared to completely evaluated reports were found (83% and 50% vs. 92% and 77%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Less than half of the [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reports of suspected VGEI met all pre-selected criteria. Incompleteness of reports led to lower sensitivity and specificity. Implementing a recommendation with specific criteria for VGEI reporting is needed in the VGEI-guideline update. This study provides a first recommendation for a concise and complete [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT report in patients with suspected VGEI. |
---|