Cargando…

Variability of [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reporting in vascular graft and endograft infection

PURPOSE: (18)F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography with low dose and/or contrast enhanced computed tomography ([(18)F]FDG-PET/CT) scan reveals high sensitivity for the diagnosis of vascular graft and endograft infection (VGEI), but lower specificity. Reporting [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT scans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liesker, David J., Legtenberg, Stijn, Erba, Paola A., Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M., Zeebregts, Clark J., De Vries, Jean-Paul P. M., Chakfé, Nabil, Saleem, Ben R., Slart, Riemer H. J. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06349-3
_version_ 1785128580803461120
author Liesker, David J.
Legtenberg, Stijn
Erba, Paola A.
Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M.
Zeebregts, Clark J.
De Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.
Chakfé, Nabil
Saleem, Ben R.
Slart, Riemer H. J. A.
author_facet Liesker, David J.
Legtenberg, Stijn
Erba, Paola A.
Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M.
Zeebregts, Clark J.
De Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.
Chakfé, Nabil
Saleem, Ben R.
Slart, Riemer H. J. A.
author_sort Liesker, David J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: (18)F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography with low dose and/or contrast enhanced computed tomography ([(18)F]FDG-PET/CT) scan reveals high sensitivity for the diagnosis of vascular graft and endograft infection (VGEI), but lower specificity. Reporting [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT scans of suspected VGEI is challenging, reader dependent, and reporting standards are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate variability of [(18)F]FDG-PET/low dose CT (LDCT) reporting of suspected VGEI using a proposed standard reporting format. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all patients with a suspected VGEI (according to the MAGIC criteria) without need for urgent surgical treatment who underwent an additional [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT scan between 2006 and 2022 at a tertiary referral centre. All [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reports were scored following pre-selected criteria that were formulated based on literature and experts in the field. The aim was to investigate the completeness of [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reports for diagnosing VGEI (proven according to the MAGIC criteria) and to evaluate if incompleteness of reports influenced the diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Hundred-fifty-two patients were included. Median diagnostic interval from the index vascular surgical procedure until [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT scan was 35.5 (7.3–73.3) months. Grafts were in 65.1% located centrally and 34.9% peripherally. Based on the pre-selected reporting criteria, 45.7% of the reports included all items. The least frequently assessed criterion was FDG-uptake pattern (40.6%). Overall, [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT showed a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 72%, and an accuracy of 88% when compared to the gold standard (diagnosed VGEI). Lower sensitivity and specificity in reports including ≤ 8 criteria compared to completely evaluated reports were found (83% and 50% vs. 92% and 77%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Less than half of the [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reports of suspected VGEI met all pre-selected criteria. Incompleteness of reports led to lower sensitivity and specificity. Implementing a recommendation with specific criteria for VGEI reporting is needed in the VGEI-guideline update. This study provides a first recommendation for a concise and complete [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT report in patients with suspected VGEI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10611872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106118722023-10-29 Variability of [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reporting in vascular graft and endograft infection Liesker, David J. Legtenberg, Stijn Erba, Paola A. Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M. Zeebregts, Clark J. De Vries, Jean-Paul P. M. Chakfé, Nabil Saleem, Ben R. Slart, Riemer H. J. A. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: (18)F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography with low dose and/or contrast enhanced computed tomography ([(18)F]FDG-PET/CT) scan reveals high sensitivity for the diagnosis of vascular graft and endograft infection (VGEI), but lower specificity. Reporting [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT scans of suspected VGEI is challenging, reader dependent, and reporting standards are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate variability of [(18)F]FDG-PET/low dose CT (LDCT) reporting of suspected VGEI using a proposed standard reporting format. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all patients with a suspected VGEI (according to the MAGIC criteria) without need for urgent surgical treatment who underwent an additional [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT scan between 2006 and 2022 at a tertiary referral centre. All [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reports were scored following pre-selected criteria that were formulated based on literature and experts in the field. The aim was to investigate the completeness of [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reports for diagnosing VGEI (proven according to the MAGIC criteria) and to evaluate if incompleteness of reports influenced the diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Hundred-fifty-two patients were included. Median diagnostic interval from the index vascular surgical procedure until [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT scan was 35.5 (7.3–73.3) months. Grafts were in 65.1% located centrally and 34.9% peripherally. Based on the pre-selected reporting criteria, 45.7% of the reports included all items. The least frequently assessed criterion was FDG-uptake pattern (40.6%). Overall, [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT showed a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 72%, and an accuracy of 88% when compared to the gold standard (diagnosed VGEI). Lower sensitivity and specificity in reports including ≤ 8 criteria compared to completely evaluated reports were found (83% and 50% vs. 92% and 77%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Less than half of the [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reports of suspected VGEI met all pre-selected criteria. Incompleteness of reports led to lower sensitivity and specificity. Implementing a recommendation with specific criteria for VGEI reporting is needed in the VGEI-guideline update. This study provides a first recommendation for a concise and complete [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT report in patients with suspected VGEI. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10611872/ /pubmed/37507493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06349-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Liesker, David J.
Legtenberg, Stijn
Erba, Paola A.
Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M.
Zeebregts, Clark J.
De Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.
Chakfé, Nabil
Saleem, Ben R.
Slart, Riemer H. J. A.
Variability of [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reporting in vascular graft and endograft infection
title Variability of [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reporting in vascular graft and endograft infection
title_full Variability of [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reporting in vascular graft and endograft infection
title_fullStr Variability of [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reporting in vascular graft and endograft infection
title_full_unstemmed Variability of [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reporting in vascular graft and endograft infection
title_short Variability of [(18)F]FDG-PET/LDCT reporting in vascular graft and endograft infection
title_sort variability of [(18)f]fdg-pet/ldct reporting in vascular graft and endograft infection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06349-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lieskerdavidj variabilityof18ffdgpetldctreportinginvasculargraftandendograftinfection
AT legtenbergstijn variabilityof18ffdgpetldctreportinginvasculargraftandendograftinfection
AT erbapaolaa variabilityof18ffdgpetldctreportinginvasculargraftandendograftinfection
AT glaudemansandorwjm variabilityof18ffdgpetldctreportinginvasculargraftandendograftinfection
AT zeebregtsclarkj variabilityof18ffdgpetldctreportinginvasculargraftandendograftinfection
AT devriesjeanpaulpm variabilityof18ffdgpetldctreportinginvasculargraftandendograftinfection
AT chakfenabil variabilityof18ffdgpetldctreportinginvasculargraftandendograftinfection
AT saleembenr variabilityof18ffdgpetldctreportinginvasculargraftandendograftinfection
AT slartriemerhja variabilityof18ffdgpetldctreportinginvasculargraftandendograftinfection