Cargando…
Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages
Studies into the viral fraction of complex microbial communities, like in the mammalian gut, have recently garnered much interest. Yet there is still no standardized protocol for extracting viruses from such samples, and the protocols that exist employ procedures that skew the viral community of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37896828 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15102051 |
_version_ | 1785128611248865280 |
---|---|
author | Larsen, Frej Offersen, Simone Margaard Li, Viktoria Rose Deng, Ling Nielsen, Dennis Sandris Rasmussen, Torben Sølbeck |
author_facet | Larsen, Frej Offersen, Simone Margaard Li, Viktoria Rose Deng, Ling Nielsen, Dennis Sandris Rasmussen, Torben Sølbeck |
author_sort | Larsen, Frej |
collection | PubMed |
description | Studies into the viral fraction of complex microbial communities, like in the mammalian gut, have recently garnered much interest. Yet there is still no standardized protocol for extracting viruses from such samples, and the protocols that exist employ procedures that skew the viral community of the sample one way or another. The first step of the extraction pipeline often consists of the basic filtering of macromolecules and bacteria, yet even this affects the viruses in a strain-specific manner. In this study, we investigate a protocol for viral extraction based on ultrafiltration and how the choice of ultrafilter might influence the extracted viral community. Clinical samples (feces, vaginal swabs, and tracheal suction samples) were spiked with a mock community of known phages (T4, c2, Φ6, Φ29, Φx174, and Φ2972), filtered, and quantified using spot and plaque assays to estimate the loss in recovery. The enveloped Φ6 phage is especially severely affected by the choice of filter, but also tailed phages such as T4 and c2 have a reduced infectivity after ultrafiltration. We conclude that the pore size of ultrafilters may affect the recovery of phages in a strain- and sample-dependent manner, suggesting the need for greater thought when selecting filters for virus extraction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10612031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106120312023-10-29 Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages Larsen, Frej Offersen, Simone Margaard Li, Viktoria Rose Deng, Ling Nielsen, Dennis Sandris Rasmussen, Torben Sølbeck Viruses Article Studies into the viral fraction of complex microbial communities, like in the mammalian gut, have recently garnered much interest. Yet there is still no standardized protocol for extracting viruses from such samples, and the protocols that exist employ procedures that skew the viral community of the sample one way or another. The first step of the extraction pipeline often consists of the basic filtering of macromolecules and bacteria, yet even this affects the viruses in a strain-specific manner. In this study, we investigate a protocol for viral extraction based on ultrafiltration and how the choice of ultrafilter might influence the extracted viral community. Clinical samples (feces, vaginal swabs, and tracheal suction samples) were spiked with a mock community of known phages (T4, c2, Φ6, Φ29, Φx174, and Φ2972), filtered, and quantified using spot and plaque assays to estimate the loss in recovery. The enveloped Φ6 phage is especially severely affected by the choice of filter, but also tailed phages such as T4 and c2 have a reduced infectivity after ultrafiltration. We conclude that the pore size of ultrafilters may affect the recovery of phages in a strain- and sample-dependent manner, suggesting the need for greater thought when selecting filters for virus extraction. MDPI 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10612031/ /pubmed/37896828 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15102051 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Larsen, Frej Offersen, Simone Margaard Li, Viktoria Rose Deng, Ling Nielsen, Dennis Sandris Rasmussen, Torben Sølbeck Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages |
title | Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages |
title_full | Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages |
title_fullStr | Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages |
title_full_unstemmed | Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages |
title_short | Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages |
title_sort | choice of ultrafilter affects recovery rate of bacteriophages |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37896828 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15102051 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT larsenfrej choiceofultrafilteraffectsrecoveryrateofbacteriophages AT offersensimonemargaard choiceofultrafilteraffectsrecoveryrateofbacteriophages AT liviktoriarose choiceofultrafilteraffectsrecoveryrateofbacteriophages AT dengling choiceofultrafilteraffectsrecoveryrateofbacteriophages AT nielsendennissandris choiceofultrafilteraffectsrecoveryrateofbacteriophages AT rasmussentorbensølbeck choiceofultrafilteraffectsrecoveryrateofbacteriophages |