Cargando…

Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages

Studies into the viral fraction of complex microbial communities, like in the mammalian gut, have recently garnered much interest. Yet there is still no standardized protocol for extracting viruses from such samples, and the protocols that exist employ procedures that skew the viral community of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larsen, Frej, Offersen, Simone Margaard, Li, Viktoria Rose, Deng, Ling, Nielsen, Dennis Sandris, Rasmussen, Torben Sølbeck
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37896828
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15102051
_version_ 1785128611248865280
author Larsen, Frej
Offersen, Simone Margaard
Li, Viktoria Rose
Deng, Ling
Nielsen, Dennis Sandris
Rasmussen, Torben Sølbeck
author_facet Larsen, Frej
Offersen, Simone Margaard
Li, Viktoria Rose
Deng, Ling
Nielsen, Dennis Sandris
Rasmussen, Torben Sølbeck
author_sort Larsen, Frej
collection PubMed
description Studies into the viral fraction of complex microbial communities, like in the mammalian gut, have recently garnered much interest. Yet there is still no standardized protocol for extracting viruses from such samples, and the protocols that exist employ procedures that skew the viral community of the sample one way or another. The first step of the extraction pipeline often consists of the basic filtering of macromolecules and bacteria, yet even this affects the viruses in a strain-specific manner. In this study, we investigate a protocol for viral extraction based on ultrafiltration and how the choice of ultrafilter might influence the extracted viral community. Clinical samples (feces, vaginal swabs, and tracheal suction samples) were spiked with a mock community of known phages (T4, c2, Φ6, Φ29, Φx174, and Φ2972), filtered, and quantified using spot and plaque assays to estimate the loss in recovery. The enveloped Φ6 phage is especially severely affected by the choice of filter, but also tailed phages such as T4 and c2 have a reduced infectivity after ultrafiltration. We conclude that the pore size of ultrafilters may affect the recovery of phages in a strain- and sample-dependent manner, suggesting the need for greater thought when selecting filters for virus extraction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10612031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106120312023-10-29 Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages Larsen, Frej Offersen, Simone Margaard Li, Viktoria Rose Deng, Ling Nielsen, Dennis Sandris Rasmussen, Torben Sølbeck Viruses Article Studies into the viral fraction of complex microbial communities, like in the mammalian gut, have recently garnered much interest. Yet there is still no standardized protocol for extracting viruses from such samples, and the protocols that exist employ procedures that skew the viral community of the sample one way or another. The first step of the extraction pipeline often consists of the basic filtering of macromolecules and bacteria, yet even this affects the viruses in a strain-specific manner. In this study, we investigate a protocol for viral extraction based on ultrafiltration and how the choice of ultrafilter might influence the extracted viral community. Clinical samples (feces, vaginal swabs, and tracheal suction samples) were spiked with a mock community of known phages (T4, c2, Φ6, Φ29, Φx174, and Φ2972), filtered, and quantified using spot and plaque assays to estimate the loss in recovery. The enveloped Φ6 phage is especially severely affected by the choice of filter, but also tailed phages such as T4 and c2 have a reduced infectivity after ultrafiltration. We conclude that the pore size of ultrafilters may affect the recovery of phages in a strain- and sample-dependent manner, suggesting the need for greater thought when selecting filters for virus extraction. MDPI 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10612031/ /pubmed/37896828 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15102051 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Larsen, Frej
Offersen, Simone Margaard
Li, Viktoria Rose
Deng, Ling
Nielsen, Dennis Sandris
Rasmussen, Torben Sølbeck
Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages
title Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages
title_full Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages
title_fullStr Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages
title_full_unstemmed Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages
title_short Choice of Ultrafilter Affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages
title_sort choice of ultrafilter affects recovery rate of bacteriophages
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37896828
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v15102051
work_keys_str_mv AT larsenfrej choiceofultrafilteraffectsrecoveryrateofbacteriophages
AT offersensimonemargaard choiceofultrafilteraffectsrecoveryrateofbacteriophages
AT liviktoriarose choiceofultrafilteraffectsrecoveryrateofbacteriophages
AT dengling choiceofultrafilteraffectsrecoveryrateofbacteriophages
AT nielsendennissandris choiceofultrafilteraffectsrecoveryrateofbacteriophages
AT rasmussentorbensølbeck choiceofultrafilteraffectsrecoveryrateofbacteriophages