Cargando…
Delivery of E. coli Nissle to the mouse gut by mucoadhesive microcontainers does not improve its competitive ability against strains linked to ulcerative colitis
For patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), administration of the probiotic E. coli Nissle (EcN) holds promise for alleviation of disease symptoms. The mechanisms are unclear, but it has been hypothesised that a capacity of the probiotic to outcompete potentially detrimental UC-associated E. coli str...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37863838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnad110 |
_version_ | 1785128635623014400 |
---|---|
author | Bondegaard, Pi Westi Torp, Anders Meyer Guerra, Priscila Kristensen, Katja Ann Christfort, Juliane Fjelrad Krogfelt, Karen Angeliki Nielsen, Line Hagner Zor, Kinga Boisen, Anja Mortensen, Martin Steen Bahl, Martin Iain Licht, Tine Rask |
author_facet | Bondegaard, Pi Westi Torp, Anders Meyer Guerra, Priscila Kristensen, Katja Ann Christfort, Juliane Fjelrad Krogfelt, Karen Angeliki Nielsen, Line Hagner Zor, Kinga Boisen, Anja Mortensen, Martin Steen Bahl, Martin Iain Licht, Tine Rask |
author_sort | Bondegaard, Pi Westi |
collection | PubMed |
description | For patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), administration of the probiotic E. coli Nissle (EcN) holds promise for alleviation of disease symptoms. The mechanisms are unclear, but it has been hypothesised that a capacity of the probiotic to outcompete potentially detrimental UC-associated E. coli strains plays an important role. However, this could previously not be confirmed in a mouse model of competition between EcN and two UC-associated strains, as reported by Petersen et al. 2011. In the present study, we re-evaluated the idea, hypothesising that delivery of EcN by a micro device dosing system (microcontainers), designed for delivery into the intestinal mucus, could support colonisation and confer a competition advantage compared to classical oral dosing. Six groups of mice were pre-colonised with one of two UC-associated E. coli strains followed by oral delivery of EcN, either in capsules containing microcontainers with freeze-dried EcN powder, capsules containing freeze-dried EcN powder, or as a fresh sucrose suspension. Co-colonisation between the probiotic and the disease-associated strains was observed regardless of dosing method, and no competition advantages linked to microcontainer delivery were identified within this setup. Other approaches are thus needed if the competitive capacity of EcN in the gut should be improved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10612143 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106121432023-10-29 Delivery of E. coli Nissle to the mouse gut by mucoadhesive microcontainers does not improve its competitive ability against strains linked to ulcerative colitis Bondegaard, Pi Westi Torp, Anders Meyer Guerra, Priscila Kristensen, Katja Ann Christfort, Juliane Fjelrad Krogfelt, Karen Angeliki Nielsen, Line Hagner Zor, Kinga Boisen, Anja Mortensen, Martin Steen Bahl, Martin Iain Licht, Tine Rask FEMS Microbiol Lett Research Letter For patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), administration of the probiotic E. coli Nissle (EcN) holds promise for alleviation of disease symptoms. The mechanisms are unclear, but it has been hypothesised that a capacity of the probiotic to outcompete potentially detrimental UC-associated E. coli strains plays an important role. However, this could previously not be confirmed in a mouse model of competition between EcN and two UC-associated strains, as reported by Petersen et al. 2011. In the present study, we re-evaluated the idea, hypothesising that delivery of EcN by a micro device dosing system (microcontainers), designed for delivery into the intestinal mucus, could support colonisation and confer a competition advantage compared to classical oral dosing. Six groups of mice were pre-colonised with one of two UC-associated E. coli strains followed by oral delivery of EcN, either in capsules containing microcontainers with freeze-dried EcN powder, capsules containing freeze-dried EcN powder, or as a fresh sucrose suspension. Co-colonisation between the probiotic and the disease-associated strains was observed regardless of dosing method, and no competition advantages linked to microcontainer delivery were identified within this setup. Other approaches are thus needed if the competitive capacity of EcN in the gut should be improved. Oxford University Press 2023-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10612143/ /pubmed/37863838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnad110 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of FEMS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Letter Bondegaard, Pi Westi Torp, Anders Meyer Guerra, Priscila Kristensen, Katja Ann Christfort, Juliane Fjelrad Krogfelt, Karen Angeliki Nielsen, Line Hagner Zor, Kinga Boisen, Anja Mortensen, Martin Steen Bahl, Martin Iain Licht, Tine Rask Delivery of E. coli Nissle to the mouse gut by mucoadhesive microcontainers does not improve its competitive ability against strains linked to ulcerative colitis |
title | Delivery of E. coli Nissle to the mouse gut by mucoadhesive microcontainers does not improve its competitive ability against strains linked to ulcerative colitis |
title_full | Delivery of E. coli Nissle to the mouse gut by mucoadhesive microcontainers does not improve its competitive ability against strains linked to ulcerative colitis |
title_fullStr | Delivery of E. coli Nissle to the mouse gut by mucoadhesive microcontainers does not improve its competitive ability against strains linked to ulcerative colitis |
title_full_unstemmed | Delivery of E. coli Nissle to the mouse gut by mucoadhesive microcontainers does not improve its competitive ability against strains linked to ulcerative colitis |
title_short | Delivery of E. coli Nissle to the mouse gut by mucoadhesive microcontainers does not improve its competitive ability against strains linked to ulcerative colitis |
title_sort | delivery of e. coli nissle to the mouse gut by mucoadhesive microcontainers does not improve its competitive ability against strains linked to ulcerative colitis |
topic | Research Letter |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37863838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnad110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bondegaardpiwesti deliveryofecolinissletothemousegutbymucoadhesivemicrocontainersdoesnotimproveitscompetitiveabilityagainststrainslinkedtoulcerativecolitis AT torpandersmeyer deliveryofecolinissletothemousegutbymucoadhesivemicrocontainersdoesnotimproveitscompetitiveabilityagainststrainslinkedtoulcerativecolitis AT guerrapriscila deliveryofecolinissletothemousegutbymucoadhesivemicrocontainersdoesnotimproveitscompetitiveabilityagainststrainslinkedtoulcerativecolitis AT kristensenkatjaann deliveryofecolinissletothemousegutbymucoadhesivemicrocontainersdoesnotimproveitscompetitiveabilityagainststrainslinkedtoulcerativecolitis AT christfortjulianefjelrad deliveryofecolinissletothemousegutbymucoadhesivemicrocontainersdoesnotimproveitscompetitiveabilityagainststrainslinkedtoulcerativecolitis AT krogfeltkarenangeliki deliveryofecolinissletothemousegutbymucoadhesivemicrocontainersdoesnotimproveitscompetitiveabilityagainststrainslinkedtoulcerativecolitis AT nielsenlinehagner deliveryofecolinissletothemousegutbymucoadhesivemicrocontainersdoesnotimproveitscompetitiveabilityagainststrainslinkedtoulcerativecolitis AT zorkinga deliveryofecolinissletothemousegutbymucoadhesivemicrocontainersdoesnotimproveitscompetitiveabilityagainststrainslinkedtoulcerativecolitis AT boisenanja deliveryofecolinissletothemousegutbymucoadhesivemicrocontainersdoesnotimproveitscompetitiveabilityagainststrainslinkedtoulcerativecolitis AT mortensenmartinsteen deliveryofecolinissletothemousegutbymucoadhesivemicrocontainersdoesnotimproveitscompetitiveabilityagainststrainslinkedtoulcerativecolitis AT bahlmartiniain deliveryofecolinissletothemousegutbymucoadhesivemicrocontainersdoesnotimproveitscompetitiveabilityagainststrainslinkedtoulcerativecolitis AT lichttinerask deliveryofecolinissletothemousegutbymucoadhesivemicrocontainersdoesnotimproveitscompetitiveabilityagainststrainslinkedtoulcerativecolitis |