Cargando…

Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study

BACKGROUND: There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA. METHODS: Patients who under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Jia Qi, Wu, Hsiang-Ling, Wang, Yi-Chien, Cata, Juan P., Chen, Jui-Tai, Cherng, Yih-Giun, Tai, Ying-Hsuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37898746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2
_version_ 1785128639959924736
author Tan, Jia Qi
Wu, Hsiang-Ling
Wang, Yi-Chien
Cata, Juan P.
Chen, Jui-Tai
Cherng, Yih-Giun
Tai, Ying-Hsuan
author_facet Tan, Jia Qi
Wu, Hsiang-Ling
Wang, Yi-Chien
Cata, Juan P.
Chen, Jui-Tai
Cherng, Yih-Giun
Tai, Ying-Hsuan
author_sort Tan, Jia Qi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA. METHODS: Patients who underwent major surgery and used morphine-based IV-PCA at a medical center from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the rate of any postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) within 72 h after surgery. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with and without the addition of droperidol to IV-PCA infusate in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: After matching, 1,104 subjects were included for analysis. The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35–0.67, p < 0.0001). The antiemetic effect of droperidol was significant within 36 h after surgery and attenuated thereafter. Droperidol was significantly associated with a lower risk of antiemetic uses (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41–0.80, p = 0.0011). The rate of unintentional sedation was comparable between the patients with (9.1%) and without (7.8%; p = 0.4481) the addition of droperidol. Postoperative opioid consumption and numeric rating scale acute pain scores were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV without increasing opiate consumption or influencing the level of sedation. However, additional prophylactic therapies are needed to prevent late-onset PONV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10612161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106121612023-10-29 Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study Tan, Jia Qi Wu, Hsiang-Ling Wang, Yi-Chien Cata, Juan P. Chen, Jui-Tai Cherng, Yih-Giun Tai, Ying-Hsuan BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA. METHODS: Patients who underwent major surgery and used morphine-based IV-PCA at a medical center from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the rate of any postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) within 72 h after surgery. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with and without the addition of droperidol to IV-PCA infusate in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: After matching, 1,104 subjects were included for analysis. The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35–0.67, p < 0.0001). The antiemetic effect of droperidol was significant within 36 h after surgery and attenuated thereafter. Droperidol was significantly associated with a lower risk of antiemetic uses (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41–0.80, p = 0.0011). The rate of unintentional sedation was comparable between the patients with (9.1%) and without (7.8%; p = 0.4481) the addition of droperidol. Postoperative opioid consumption and numeric rating scale acute pain scores were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV without increasing opiate consumption or influencing the level of sedation. However, additional prophylactic therapies are needed to prevent late-onset PONV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2. BioMed Central 2023-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10612161/ /pubmed/37898746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tan, Jia Qi
Wu, Hsiang-Ling
Wang, Yi-Chien
Cata, Juan P.
Chen, Jui-Tai
Cherng, Yih-Giun
Tai, Ying-Hsuan
Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study
title Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study
title_full Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study
title_fullStr Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study
title_short Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study
title_sort antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37898746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2
work_keys_str_mv AT tanjiaqi antiemeticprophylaxiswithdroperidolinmorphinebasedintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy
AT wuhsiangling antiemeticprophylaxiswithdroperidolinmorphinebasedintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy
AT wangyichien antiemeticprophylaxiswithdroperidolinmorphinebasedintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy
AT catajuanp antiemeticprophylaxiswithdroperidolinmorphinebasedintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy
AT chenjuitai antiemeticprophylaxiswithdroperidolinmorphinebasedintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy
AT cherngyihgiun antiemeticprophylaxiswithdroperidolinmorphinebasedintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy
AT taiyinghsuan antiemeticprophylaxiswithdroperidolinmorphinebasedintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy