Cargando…
Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study
BACKGROUND: There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA. METHODS: Patients who under...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37898746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2 |
_version_ | 1785128639959924736 |
---|---|
author | Tan, Jia Qi Wu, Hsiang-Ling Wang, Yi-Chien Cata, Juan P. Chen, Jui-Tai Cherng, Yih-Giun Tai, Ying-Hsuan |
author_facet | Tan, Jia Qi Wu, Hsiang-Ling Wang, Yi-Chien Cata, Juan P. Chen, Jui-Tai Cherng, Yih-Giun Tai, Ying-Hsuan |
author_sort | Tan, Jia Qi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA. METHODS: Patients who underwent major surgery and used morphine-based IV-PCA at a medical center from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the rate of any postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) within 72 h after surgery. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with and without the addition of droperidol to IV-PCA infusate in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: After matching, 1,104 subjects were included for analysis. The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35–0.67, p < 0.0001). The antiemetic effect of droperidol was significant within 36 h after surgery and attenuated thereafter. Droperidol was significantly associated with a lower risk of antiemetic uses (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41–0.80, p = 0.0011). The rate of unintentional sedation was comparable between the patients with (9.1%) and without (7.8%; p = 0.4481) the addition of droperidol. Postoperative opioid consumption and numeric rating scale acute pain scores were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV without increasing opiate consumption or influencing the level of sedation. However, additional prophylactic therapies are needed to prevent late-onset PONV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10612161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106121612023-10-29 Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study Tan, Jia Qi Wu, Hsiang-Ling Wang, Yi-Chien Cata, Juan P. Chen, Jui-Tai Cherng, Yih-Giun Tai, Ying-Hsuan BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA. METHODS: Patients who underwent major surgery and used morphine-based IV-PCA at a medical center from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the rate of any postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) within 72 h after surgery. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with and without the addition of droperidol to IV-PCA infusate in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: After matching, 1,104 subjects were included for analysis. The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35–0.67, p < 0.0001). The antiemetic effect of droperidol was significant within 36 h after surgery and attenuated thereafter. Droperidol was significantly associated with a lower risk of antiemetic uses (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41–0.80, p = 0.0011). The rate of unintentional sedation was comparable between the patients with (9.1%) and without (7.8%; p = 0.4481) the addition of droperidol. Postoperative opioid consumption and numeric rating scale acute pain scores were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV without increasing opiate consumption or influencing the level of sedation. However, additional prophylactic therapies are needed to prevent late-onset PONV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2. BioMed Central 2023-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10612161/ /pubmed/37898746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Tan, Jia Qi Wu, Hsiang-Ling Wang, Yi-Chien Cata, Juan P. Chen, Jui-Tai Cherng, Yih-Giun Tai, Ying-Hsuan Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study |
title | Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study |
title_full | Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study |
title_fullStr | Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study |
title_short | Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study |
title_sort | antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37898746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanjiaqi antiemeticprophylaxiswithdroperidolinmorphinebasedintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT wuhsiangling antiemeticprophylaxiswithdroperidolinmorphinebasedintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT wangyichien antiemeticprophylaxiswithdroperidolinmorphinebasedintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT catajuanp antiemeticprophylaxiswithdroperidolinmorphinebasedintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT chenjuitai antiemeticprophylaxiswithdroperidolinmorphinebasedintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT cherngyihgiun antiemeticprophylaxiswithdroperidolinmorphinebasedintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy AT taiyinghsuan antiemeticprophylaxiswithdroperidolinmorphinebasedintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiaapropensityscorematchedcohortstudy |