Cargando…

A transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect

BACKGROUND: A cesarean scar defect (CSD) is incomplete healing of the myometrium at the site of a prior cesarean section (CS), complicating more than half of all cesarean sections. While transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) is the most common modality for diagnosing this defect, hysteroscopy remains the go...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allameh, Zahra, Rouholamin, Safoura, Rasti, Sina, Adibi, Atoosa, Foroughi, Zahra, Goharian, Maryam, Rad, Mehrdad Rabiee, Dabaghi, Ghazal Ghasempour
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37891612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02715-3
_version_ 1785128653840973824
author Allameh, Zahra
Rouholamin, Safoura
Rasti, Sina
Adibi, Atoosa
Foroughi, Zahra
Goharian, Maryam
Rad, Mehrdad Rabiee
Dabaghi, Ghazal Ghasempour
author_facet Allameh, Zahra
Rouholamin, Safoura
Rasti, Sina
Adibi, Atoosa
Foroughi, Zahra
Goharian, Maryam
Rad, Mehrdad Rabiee
Dabaghi, Ghazal Ghasempour
author_sort Allameh, Zahra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A cesarean scar defect (CSD) is incomplete healing of the myometrium at the site of a prior cesarean section (CS), complicating more than half of all cesarean sections. While transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) is the most common modality for diagnosing this defect, hysteroscopy remains the gold standard. We aimed to develop an efficient diagnostic tool for CSD among women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) by integrating TVU findings and participants’ demographic features. METHODS: A single-center cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 premenopausal and non-pregnant women with a history of CS complaining of AUB without a known systemic or structural etiology. Each participant underwent a hysteroscopy followed by a TVU the next day. The defect dimensions in TVU, patients’ age, and the number of previous CSs were integrated into a binary logistic regression model to evaluate their predictive ability for a hysteroscopy-confirmed CSD. RESULTS: Hysteroscopy identified 74 (74%) participants with CSD. The variables age, the number of CSs, defect length, and defect width significantly contributed to the logistic regression model to diagnose CSD with odds ratios of 9.7, 0.7, 2.6, and 1.7, respectively. The developed model exhibited accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 88.00%, 91.89%, and 76.92%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.955 (P-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Among non-pregnant women suspected of CSD due to AUB, looking at age, the number of previous CSs, and TVU-based defect width and length can efficiently rule CSD out.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10612219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106122192023-10-29 A transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect Allameh, Zahra Rouholamin, Safoura Rasti, Sina Adibi, Atoosa Foroughi, Zahra Goharian, Maryam Rad, Mehrdad Rabiee Dabaghi, Ghazal Ghasempour BMC Womens Health Research BACKGROUND: A cesarean scar defect (CSD) is incomplete healing of the myometrium at the site of a prior cesarean section (CS), complicating more than half of all cesarean sections. While transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) is the most common modality for diagnosing this defect, hysteroscopy remains the gold standard. We aimed to develop an efficient diagnostic tool for CSD among women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) by integrating TVU findings and participants’ demographic features. METHODS: A single-center cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 premenopausal and non-pregnant women with a history of CS complaining of AUB without a known systemic or structural etiology. Each participant underwent a hysteroscopy followed by a TVU the next day. The defect dimensions in TVU, patients’ age, and the number of previous CSs were integrated into a binary logistic regression model to evaluate their predictive ability for a hysteroscopy-confirmed CSD. RESULTS: Hysteroscopy identified 74 (74%) participants with CSD. The variables age, the number of CSs, defect length, and defect width significantly contributed to the logistic regression model to diagnose CSD with odds ratios of 9.7, 0.7, 2.6, and 1.7, respectively. The developed model exhibited accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 88.00%, 91.89%, and 76.92%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.955 (P-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Among non-pregnant women suspected of CSD due to AUB, looking at age, the number of previous CSs, and TVU-based defect width and length can efficiently rule CSD out. BioMed Central 2023-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10612219/ /pubmed/37891612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02715-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Allameh, Zahra
Rouholamin, Safoura
Rasti, Sina
Adibi, Atoosa
Foroughi, Zahra
Goharian, Maryam
Rad, Mehrdad Rabiee
Dabaghi, Ghazal Ghasempour
A transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect
title A transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect
title_full A transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect
title_fullStr A transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect
title_full_unstemmed A transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect
title_short A transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect
title_sort transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37891612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02715-3
work_keys_str_mv AT allamehzahra atransvaginalultrasoundbaseddiagnosticcalculatorforuteruspostcesareanscardefect
AT rouholaminsafoura atransvaginalultrasoundbaseddiagnosticcalculatorforuteruspostcesareanscardefect
AT rastisina atransvaginalultrasoundbaseddiagnosticcalculatorforuteruspostcesareanscardefect
AT adibiatoosa atransvaginalultrasoundbaseddiagnosticcalculatorforuteruspostcesareanscardefect
AT foroughizahra atransvaginalultrasoundbaseddiagnosticcalculatorforuteruspostcesareanscardefect
AT goharianmaryam atransvaginalultrasoundbaseddiagnosticcalculatorforuteruspostcesareanscardefect
AT radmehrdadrabiee atransvaginalultrasoundbaseddiagnosticcalculatorforuteruspostcesareanscardefect
AT dabaghighazalghasempour atransvaginalultrasoundbaseddiagnosticcalculatorforuteruspostcesareanscardefect
AT allamehzahra transvaginalultrasoundbaseddiagnosticcalculatorforuteruspostcesareanscardefect
AT rouholaminsafoura transvaginalultrasoundbaseddiagnosticcalculatorforuteruspostcesareanscardefect
AT rastisina transvaginalultrasoundbaseddiagnosticcalculatorforuteruspostcesareanscardefect
AT adibiatoosa transvaginalultrasoundbaseddiagnosticcalculatorforuteruspostcesareanscardefect
AT foroughizahra transvaginalultrasoundbaseddiagnosticcalculatorforuteruspostcesareanscardefect
AT goharianmaryam transvaginalultrasoundbaseddiagnosticcalculatorforuteruspostcesareanscardefect
AT radmehrdadrabiee transvaginalultrasoundbaseddiagnosticcalculatorforuteruspostcesareanscardefect
AT dabaghighazalghasempour transvaginalultrasoundbaseddiagnosticcalculatorforuteruspostcesareanscardefect