Cargando…

Systematic review and meta-analysis: the efficiency of bacteriophages previously patented against pathogenic bacteria on food

Food-borne diseases are a global public health issue with 1 in 10 people falling ill after eating contaminated food every year. In response, the food industry has implemented several new pathogen control strategies, such as biotechnological tools using the direct application of bacteriophages for bi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romero-Calle, Danitza Xiomara, de Santana, Vinicius Pereira, Benevides, Raquel Guimarães, Aliaga, Maria Teresa Alvarez, Billington, Craig, Góes-Neto, Aristóteles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37898821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02352-9
_version_ 1785128663553933312
author Romero-Calle, Danitza Xiomara
de Santana, Vinicius Pereira
Benevides, Raquel Guimarães
Aliaga, Maria Teresa Alvarez
Billington, Craig
Góes-Neto, Aristóteles
author_facet Romero-Calle, Danitza Xiomara
de Santana, Vinicius Pereira
Benevides, Raquel Guimarães
Aliaga, Maria Teresa Alvarez
Billington, Craig
Góes-Neto, Aristóteles
author_sort Romero-Calle, Danitza Xiomara
collection PubMed
description Food-borne diseases are a global public health issue with 1 in 10 people falling ill after eating contaminated food every year. In response, the food industry has implemented several new pathogen control strategies, such as biotechnological tools using the direct application of bacteriophages for biological control. We have undertaken a systematic review and meta-analysis that evaluated the efficiency of patented phages as a biological control for food-borne pathogens and determined the physical–chemical characteristics of the antimicrobial effect. Included and excluded criteria was developed. Included criteria: Phage patent files with an application in biological control on food and scientific articles and book chapters that used phages patented for food biological control. Excluded criteria: Patent documents, scientific articles, and book chapters that included phage therapy in humans, animals, and biological control on plants but did not have an application on food were not considered in our study. The systematic analysis identified 77 documents, 46 scientific articles, and 31 documents of patents and 23 articles was included in the meta-analysis. Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella sp. comprised most of the targets identified in the screening, so that we focused on these strains to do the meta-analysis. There are a total of 383 and 192 experiments for Listeria and Salmonella phages for quantitative data analysis. Indexing databases for the bibliographic search (Scopus, Web of Science (WoS) and PubMed (Medline) were addressed by an automated script written in Python 3 Python Core Team (2015) and deposited on GitHub (https://github.com/glenjasper). A random-effects meta-analysis revealed (i) significant antimicrobial effect of Listeria phages in apple, apple juice, pear, and pear juice, (ii) significant antimicrobial effect of Salmonella phages in eggs, apple, and ready-to-eat chicken, (iii) no heterogeneity was identified in either meta-analysis, (iv) publication bias was detected for Listeria phages but not for Salmonella phages. (v) ListShield and Felix01 phages showed the best result for Listeria and Salmonella biological control, respectively, (vi) concentration of phage and bacteria, time and food had significant effect in the biological control of Listeria, (vii) temperature and time had a significant effect on the antimicrobial activity of Salmonella phages. The systematic review and meta-analyses to determine the efficiency of bacteriophages previously patented against pathogenic bacteria on dairy products, meat, fruits and vegetables. Besides, the discovering of key factors for efficacy, so that future applications of phage biotechnology in foods can be optimally deployed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-023-02352-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10612260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106122602023-10-29 Systematic review and meta-analysis: the efficiency of bacteriophages previously patented against pathogenic bacteria on food Romero-Calle, Danitza Xiomara de Santana, Vinicius Pereira Benevides, Raquel Guimarães Aliaga, Maria Teresa Alvarez Billington, Craig Góes-Neto, Aristóteles Syst Rev Systematic Review Update Food-borne diseases are a global public health issue with 1 in 10 people falling ill after eating contaminated food every year. In response, the food industry has implemented several new pathogen control strategies, such as biotechnological tools using the direct application of bacteriophages for biological control. We have undertaken a systematic review and meta-analysis that evaluated the efficiency of patented phages as a biological control for food-borne pathogens and determined the physical–chemical characteristics of the antimicrobial effect. Included and excluded criteria was developed. Included criteria: Phage patent files with an application in biological control on food and scientific articles and book chapters that used phages patented for food biological control. Excluded criteria: Patent documents, scientific articles, and book chapters that included phage therapy in humans, animals, and biological control on plants but did not have an application on food were not considered in our study. The systematic analysis identified 77 documents, 46 scientific articles, and 31 documents of patents and 23 articles was included in the meta-analysis. Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella sp. comprised most of the targets identified in the screening, so that we focused on these strains to do the meta-analysis. There are a total of 383 and 192 experiments for Listeria and Salmonella phages for quantitative data analysis. Indexing databases for the bibliographic search (Scopus, Web of Science (WoS) and PubMed (Medline) were addressed by an automated script written in Python 3 Python Core Team (2015) and deposited on GitHub (https://github.com/glenjasper). A random-effects meta-analysis revealed (i) significant antimicrobial effect of Listeria phages in apple, apple juice, pear, and pear juice, (ii) significant antimicrobial effect of Salmonella phages in eggs, apple, and ready-to-eat chicken, (iii) no heterogeneity was identified in either meta-analysis, (iv) publication bias was detected for Listeria phages but not for Salmonella phages. (v) ListShield and Felix01 phages showed the best result for Listeria and Salmonella biological control, respectively, (vi) concentration of phage and bacteria, time and food had significant effect in the biological control of Listeria, (vii) temperature and time had a significant effect on the antimicrobial activity of Salmonella phages. The systematic review and meta-analyses to determine the efficiency of bacteriophages previously patented against pathogenic bacteria on dairy products, meat, fruits and vegetables. Besides, the discovering of key factors for efficacy, so that future applications of phage biotechnology in foods can be optimally deployed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-023-02352-9. BioMed Central 2023-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10612260/ /pubmed/37898821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02352-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review Update
Romero-Calle, Danitza Xiomara
de Santana, Vinicius Pereira
Benevides, Raquel Guimarães
Aliaga, Maria Teresa Alvarez
Billington, Craig
Góes-Neto, Aristóteles
Systematic review and meta-analysis: the efficiency of bacteriophages previously patented against pathogenic bacteria on food
title Systematic review and meta-analysis: the efficiency of bacteriophages previously patented against pathogenic bacteria on food
title_full Systematic review and meta-analysis: the efficiency of bacteriophages previously patented against pathogenic bacteria on food
title_fullStr Systematic review and meta-analysis: the efficiency of bacteriophages previously patented against pathogenic bacteria on food
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and meta-analysis: the efficiency of bacteriophages previously patented against pathogenic bacteria on food
title_short Systematic review and meta-analysis: the efficiency of bacteriophages previously patented against pathogenic bacteria on food
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis: the efficiency of bacteriophages previously patented against pathogenic bacteria on food
topic Systematic Review Update
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37898821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02352-9
work_keys_str_mv AT romerocalledanitzaxiomara systematicreviewandmetaanalysistheefficiencyofbacteriophagespreviouslypatentedagainstpathogenicbacteriaonfood
AT desantanaviniciuspereira systematicreviewandmetaanalysistheefficiencyofbacteriophagespreviouslypatentedagainstpathogenicbacteriaonfood
AT benevidesraquelguimaraes systematicreviewandmetaanalysistheefficiencyofbacteriophagespreviouslypatentedagainstpathogenicbacteriaonfood
AT aliagamariateresaalvarez systematicreviewandmetaanalysistheefficiencyofbacteriophagespreviouslypatentedagainstpathogenicbacteriaonfood
AT billingtoncraig systematicreviewandmetaanalysistheefficiencyofbacteriophagespreviouslypatentedagainstpathogenicbacteriaonfood
AT goesnetoaristoteles systematicreviewandmetaanalysistheefficiencyofbacteriophagespreviouslypatentedagainstpathogenicbacteriaonfood