Cargando…

Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life Questionnaire

BACKGROUND: The Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life (InToDermQoL) is the dermatology-specific proxy health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument for children from birth to 4 years. The aim of the present study was to confirm the responsiveness and establish minimal clinically impor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chernyshov, Pavel V., Marron, Servando E., Koumaki, Dimitra, Pustišek, Nives, Manolache, Liana, Salavastru, Carmen, Suru, Alina, Sendrea, Adelina, Svyatenko, Tetiana, Statkevych, Olha, Boffa, Michael J., Grech, Sara Borg, Zemskov, Sergii, Kuts, Volodymyr V., Lishchynskyi, Pavlo, Chernyshov, Andrii V., Tomas-Aragones, Lucia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-023-01022-x
_version_ 1785128771263660032
author Chernyshov, Pavel V.
Marron, Servando E.
Koumaki, Dimitra
Pustišek, Nives
Manolache, Liana
Salavastru, Carmen
Suru, Alina
Sendrea, Adelina
Svyatenko, Tetiana
Statkevych, Olha
Boffa, Michael J.
Grech, Sara Borg
Zemskov, Sergii
Kuts, Volodymyr V.
Lishchynskyi, Pavlo
Chernyshov, Andrii V.
Tomas-Aragones, Lucia
author_facet Chernyshov, Pavel V.
Marron, Servando E.
Koumaki, Dimitra
Pustišek, Nives
Manolache, Liana
Salavastru, Carmen
Suru, Alina
Sendrea, Adelina
Svyatenko, Tetiana
Statkevych, Olha
Boffa, Michael J.
Grech, Sara Borg
Zemskov, Sergii
Kuts, Volodymyr V.
Lishchynskyi, Pavlo
Chernyshov, Andrii V.
Tomas-Aragones, Lucia
author_sort Chernyshov, Pavel V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life (InToDermQoL) is the dermatology-specific proxy health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument for children from birth to 4 years. The aim of the present study was to confirm the responsiveness and establish minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the InToDermQoL. METHODS: Parents of children with skin diseases were asked to fill in the InToDermQoL at the initial visit (T1) and subsequent consultation (T2). We hypothesized that correlations between change scores of the InToDermQoL and change scores of global assessment of clinical severity by dermatologists and by patients’ parents should be above 0.3. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves method was also used for confirmation of responsiveness and determination of MCIDs of the InToDermQoL. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used as an indicator of responsiveness. RESULTS: Results of 442 patients were included. Correlations between change scores of age-specific versions of the InToDermQoL and change scores of global assessment of clinical severity by dermatologists and by patients’ parents were above 0.3 (0.46-0.74). AUCs for age-specific versions of the InToDermQoL were acceptable (above 0.7) or excellent (above 0.8). Estimated MCIDs for the InToDermQoL were as follows: 3 points of total score change for 0–11 months, 5 for 1–2 years and 3 or 4 for 3–4 years version. Estimated MCIDs for the InToDermQoL version for 1–2-year-old children was higher than MCIDs for the 3–4-year-old version despite the higher number of items in the latter. Therefore a MCID of 5 was recommended for both these versions. CONCLUSIONS: Responsiveness for all age-specific versions of the InToDermQoL questionnaire was confirmed. MCIDs for the InToDermQoL are proposed as follows: 3-point change of the total score for age version 0–11 months and 5-point for the age versions 1–2 years and 3–4 years. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-023-01022-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10613170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106131702023-10-30 Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life Questionnaire Chernyshov, Pavel V. Marron, Servando E. Koumaki, Dimitra Pustišek, Nives Manolache, Liana Salavastru, Carmen Suru, Alina Sendrea, Adelina Svyatenko, Tetiana Statkevych, Olha Boffa, Michael J. Grech, Sara Borg Zemskov, Sergii Kuts, Volodymyr V. Lishchynskyi, Pavlo Chernyshov, Andrii V. Tomas-Aragones, Lucia Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) Brief Report BACKGROUND: The Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life (InToDermQoL) is the dermatology-specific proxy health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument for children from birth to 4 years. The aim of the present study was to confirm the responsiveness and establish minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the InToDermQoL. METHODS: Parents of children with skin diseases were asked to fill in the InToDermQoL at the initial visit (T1) and subsequent consultation (T2). We hypothesized that correlations between change scores of the InToDermQoL and change scores of global assessment of clinical severity by dermatologists and by patients’ parents should be above 0.3. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves method was also used for confirmation of responsiveness and determination of MCIDs of the InToDermQoL. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used as an indicator of responsiveness. RESULTS: Results of 442 patients were included. Correlations between change scores of age-specific versions of the InToDermQoL and change scores of global assessment of clinical severity by dermatologists and by patients’ parents were above 0.3 (0.46-0.74). AUCs for age-specific versions of the InToDermQoL were acceptable (above 0.7) or excellent (above 0.8). Estimated MCIDs for the InToDermQoL were as follows: 3 points of total score change for 0–11 months, 5 for 1–2 years and 3 or 4 for 3–4 years version. Estimated MCIDs for the InToDermQoL version for 1–2-year-old children was higher than MCIDs for the 3–4-year-old version despite the higher number of items in the latter. Therefore a MCID of 5 was recommended for both these versions. CONCLUSIONS: Responsiveness for all age-specific versions of the InToDermQoL questionnaire was confirmed. MCIDs for the InToDermQoL are proposed as follows: 3-point change of the total score for age version 0–11 months and 5-point for the age versions 1–2 years and 3–4 years. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-023-01022-x. Springer Healthcare 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10613170/ /pubmed/37731087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-023-01022-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Brief Report
Chernyshov, Pavel V.
Marron, Servando E.
Koumaki, Dimitra
Pustišek, Nives
Manolache, Liana
Salavastru, Carmen
Suru, Alina
Sendrea, Adelina
Svyatenko, Tetiana
Statkevych, Olha
Boffa, Michael J.
Grech, Sara Borg
Zemskov, Sergii
Kuts, Volodymyr V.
Lishchynskyi, Pavlo
Chernyshov, Andrii V.
Tomas-Aragones, Lucia
Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life Questionnaire
title Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life Questionnaire
title_full Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life Questionnaire
title_fullStr Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life Questionnaire
title_short Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life Questionnaire
title_sort responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the infants and toddlers dermatology quality of life questionnaire
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-023-01022-x
work_keys_str_mv AT chernyshovpavelv responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT marronservandoe responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT koumakidimitra responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT pustiseknives responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT manolacheliana responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT salavastrucarmen responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT surualina responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT sendreaadelina responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT svyatenkotetiana responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT statkevycholha responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT boffamichaelj responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT grechsaraborg responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT zemskovsergii responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT kutsvolodymyrv responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT lishchynskyipavlo responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT chernyshovandriiv responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire
AT tomasaragoneslucia responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceoftheinfantsandtoddlersdermatologyqualityoflifequestionnaire