Cargando…
Biomechanics of sacroiliac joint fixation using lag screws: a cadaveric study
BACKGROUND: Iliosacral screw placement is ubiquitous and now part of the surgeon’s pelvic trauma armamentarium. More recent evidence supports sacroiliac arthrodesis for treating sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction in select patients. Regardless of the surgical indication, there are currently no studi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37898818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04311-5 |
_version_ | 1785128822070312960 |
---|---|
author | Chatain, Grégoire P. Oldham, Alton Uribe, Juan Duhon, Bradley Gardner, Michael J. Witt, Jens-Peter Yerby, Scott Kelly, Brian P. |
author_facet | Chatain, Grégoire P. Oldham, Alton Uribe, Juan Duhon, Bradley Gardner, Michael J. Witt, Jens-Peter Yerby, Scott Kelly, Brian P. |
author_sort | Chatain, Grégoire P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Iliosacral screw placement is ubiquitous and now part of the surgeon’s pelvic trauma armamentarium. More recent evidence supports sacroiliac arthrodesis for treating sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction in select patients. Regardless of the surgical indication, there are currently no studies examining lag screw compression biomechanics across the SIJ. The objective of this biomechanical investigation was to quantify iliosacral implant compressive loads and to examine the insertion torque and compressive load profile over time. METHODS: Eight human cadaveric pelvic specimens underwent SIJ fixation at S1 and S2 using 11.5 and 10.0 mm iFuse-TORQ Lag implants, respectively, and standard 7.3 mm trauma lag screws. Load decay analysis was performed, and insertion and removal torques were measured. RESULTS: For both implants at S1 and S2 levels, the load relaxed 50% in approximately 67 min. Compressive load decay was approximately 70% on average occurring approximately 15 h post-insertion. Average insertion torque for the 11.5 mm TORQ implant at S1 was significantly greater than the trauma lag screw. Similarly, at S2, insertion torque of the 10.0 mm TORQ implant was greater than the trauma lag screw. At S1, removal torque for the 11.5 mm TORQ implant was higher than the trauma lag screw; there was no significant difference in the removal torque at S2. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that a novel posterior pelvic implant with a larger diameter, roughened surface, and dual pitch threads achieved improved insertion and removal torques compared to a standard screw. Load relaxation characteristics were similar between all implants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10613391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106133912023-10-30 Biomechanics of sacroiliac joint fixation using lag screws: a cadaveric study Chatain, Grégoire P. Oldham, Alton Uribe, Juan Duhon, Bradley Gardner, Michael J. Witt, Jens-Peter Yerby, Scott Kelly, Brian P. J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Iliosacral screw placement is ubiquitous and now part of the surgeon’s pelvic trauma armamentarium. More recent evidence supports sacroiliac arthrodesis for treating sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction in select patients. Regardless of the surgical indication, there are currently no studies examining lag screw compression biomechanics across the SIJ. The objective of this biomechanical investigation was to quantify iliosacral implant compressive loads and to examine the insertion torque and compressive load profile over time. METHODS: Eight human cadaveric pelvic specimens underwent SIJ fixation at S1 and S2 using 11.5 and 10.0 mm iFuse-TORQ Lag implants, respectively, and standard 7.3 mm trauma lag screws. Load decay analysis was performed, and insertion and removal torques were measured. RESULTS: For both implants at S1 and S2 levels, the load relaxed 50% in approximately 67 min. Compressive load decay was approximately 70% on average occurring approximately 15 h post-insertion. Average insertion torque for the 11.5 mm TORQ implant at S1 was significantly greater than the trauma lag screw. Similarly, at S2, insertion torque of the 10.0 mm TORQ implant was greater than the trauma lag screw. At S1, removal torque for the 11.5 mm TORQ implant was higher than the trauma lag screw; there was no significant difference in the removal torque at S2. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that a novel posterior pelvic implant with a larger diameter, roughened surface, and dual pitch threads achieved improved insertion and removal torques compared to a standard screw. Load relaxation characteristics were similar between all implants. BioMed Central 2023-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10613391/ /pubmed/37898818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04311-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chatain, Grégoire P. Oldham, Alton Uribe, Juan Duhon, Bradley Gardner, Michael J. Witt, Jens-Peter Yerby, Scott Kelly, Brian P. Biomechanics of sacroiliac joint fixation using lag screws: a cadaveric study |
title | Biomechanics of sacroiliac joint fixation using lag screws: a cadaveric study |
title_full | Biomechanics of sacroiliac joint fixation using lag screws: a cadaveric study |
title_fullStr | Biomechanics of sacroiliac joint fixation using lag screws: a cadaveric study |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanics of sacroiliac joint fixation using lag screws: a cadaveric study |
title_short | Biomechanics of sacroiliac joint fixation using lag screws: a cadaveric study |
title_sort | biomechanics of sacroiliac joint fixation using lag screws: a cadaveric study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37898818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04311-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chataingregoirep biomechanicsofsacroiliacjointfixationusinglagscrewsacadavericstudy AT oldhamalton biomechanicsofsacroiliacjointfixationusinglagscrewsacadavericstudy AT uribejuan biomechanicsofsacroiliacjointfixationusinglagscrewsacadavericstudy AT duhonbradley biomechanicsofsacroiliacjointfixationusinglagscrewsacadavericstudy AT gardnermichaelj biomechanicsofsacroiliacjointfixationusinglagscrewsacadavericstudy AT wittjenspeter biomechanicsofsacroiliacjointfixationusinglagscrewsacadavericstudy AT yerbyscott biomechanicsofsacroiliacjointfixationusinglagscrewsacadavericstudy AT kellybrianp biomechanicsofsacroiliacjointfixationusinglagscrewsacadavericstudy |