Cargando…

Comparison of four risk assessment scales in predicting the risk of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in adult surgical patients: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE: To develop and compare four predictive models for intraoperative acquired pressure injury (IAPI) in surgical patients. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing various surgeries (hepatobiliary, pancreas, spleen, gastrointestinal, and cardiac surgeries) at Ruijin Hospital from November 202...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yuan, Wang, Wei, Qian, QianJian, Wu, BeiWen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37898108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605231207530
_version_ 1785128824433803264
author Chen, Yuan
Wang, Wei
Qian, QianJian
Wu, BeiWen
author_facet Chen, Yuan
Wang, Wei
Qian, QianJian
Wu, BeiWen
author_sort Chen, Yuan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop and compare four predictive models for intraoperative acquired pressure injury (IAPI) in surgical patients. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing various surgeries (hepatobiliary, pancreas, spleen, gastrointestinal, and cardiac surgeries) at Ruijin Hospital from November 2021 to September 2022 were included in this prospective cohort study. Four pressure injury risk assessment scales were used to measure the pressure injury risk: the Braden scale, Munro Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale, Scott Triggers tool, and CORN Intraoperative Acquired Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale. The patients were divided into the IAPI group and non-IAPI group. RESULTS: In total, 37% of patients (37/100) developed class I/stage pressure injury (erythema) after surgery, which resolved within 2 hours after surgery in 86.49% of cases and further progressed to class II/stage or higher pressure injury within 6 days in 15.63% of cases. The application effects of the four commonly used risk assessment tools were compared with the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The Munro Scale showed the best sensitivity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve among the four tools for postoperative assessment, but its specificity was only 20.63. CONCLUSIONS: More appropriate assessment tools are required for IAPI risk evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10613401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106134012023-10-30 Comparison of four risk assessment scales in predicting the risk of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in adult surgical patients: a prospective study Chen, Yuan Wang, Wei Qian, QianJian Wu, BeiWen J Int Med Res Prospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: To develop and compare four predictive models for intraoperative acquired pressure injury (IAPI) in surgical patients. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing various surgeries (hepatobiliary, pancreas, spleen, gastrointestinal, and cardiac surgeries) at Ruijin Hospital from November 2021 to September 2022 were included in this prospective cohort study. Four pressure injury risk assessment scales were used to measure the pressure injury risk: the Braden scale, Munro Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale, Scott Triggers tool, and CORN Intraoperative Acquired Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale. The patients were divided into the IAPI group and non-IAPI group. RESULTS: In total, 37% of patients (37/100) developed class I/stage pressure injury (erythema) after surgery, which resolved within 2 hours after surgery in 86.49% of cases and further progressed to class II/stage or higher pressure injury within 6 days in 15.63% of cases. The application effects of the four commonly used risk assessment tools were compared with the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The Munro Scale showed the best sensitivity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve among the four tools for postoperative assessment, but its specificity was only 20.63. CONCLUSIONS: More appropriate assessment tools are required for IAPI risk evaluation. SAGE Publications 2023-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10613401/ /pubmed/37898108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605231207530 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Prospective Clinical Research Report
Chen, Yuan
Wang, Wei
Qian, QianJian
Wu, BeiWen
Comparison of four risk assessment scales in predicting the risk of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in adult surgical patients: a prospective study
title Comparison of four risk assessment scales in predicting the risk of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in adult surgical patients: a prospective study
title_full Comparison of four risk assessment scales in predicting the risk of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in adult surgical patients: a prospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of four risk assessment scales in predicting the risk of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in adult surgical patients: a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of four risk assessment scales in predicting the risk of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in adult surgical patients: a prospective study
title_short Comparison of four risk assessment scales in predicting the risk of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in adult surgical patients: a prospective study
title_sort comparison of four risk assessment scales in predicting the risk of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in adult surgical patients: a prospective study
topic Prospective Clinical Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37898108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605231207530
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyuan comparisonoffourriskassessmentscalesinpredictingtheriskofintraoperativeacquiredpressureinjuryinadultsurgicalpatientsaprospectivestudy
AT wangwei comparisonoffourriskassessmentscalesinpredictingtheriskofintraoperativeacquiredpressureinjuryinadultsurgicalpatientsaprospectivestudy
AT qianqianjian comparisonoffourriskassessmentscalesinpredictingtheriskofintraoperativeacquiredpressureinjuryinadultsurgicalpatientsaprospectivestudy
AT wubeiwen comparisonoffourriskassessmentscalesinpredictingtheriskofintraoperativeacquiredpressureinjuryinadultsurgicalpatientsaprospectivestudy