Cargando…
A comparative study between surgical cut down and percutaneous closure devices in management of large bore arterial access
BACKGROUND: Compared to conventional open surgery, minimally invasive catheter-based procedures have less post procedural complications. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) require large bore arterial access. Optimal site management of large bore ar...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37899370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00395-6 |
_version_ | 1785128864503037952 |
---|---|
author | Mousa, Mohamed Ahmed Zahwy, Sherif Samir El Tamara, Ahmed Fathy Samir, Wafed Tantawy, Mahmoud Ahmed |
author_facet | Mousa, Mohamed Ahmed Zahwy, Sherif Samir El Tamara, Ahmed Fathy Samir, Wafed Tantawy, Mahmoud Ahmed |
author_sort | Mousa, Mohamed Ahmed |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Compared to conventional open surgery, minimally invasive catheter-based procedures have less post procedural complications. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) require large bore arterial access. Optimal site management of large bore arterial access is pivotal to reduce the hospital-acquired complications associated with large bore arterial access. We wanted to compare surgical cutdown versus percutaneous closure devices in site management of large bore arterial access. METHODS: Participants planned for TAVI or EVAR with large bore arterial access more than 10 French were included, while participants with history of bypass surgery, malignancies, thrombophilia, or sepsis were excluded. A consecutive sample of 100 participants (mean age 74.66 ± 2.65 years, 61% males) was selected, underwent TAVI or EVAR with surgical cutdown (group 1) versus TAVI or EVAR with Proglide™ percutaneous closure device (group 2). RESULTS: The incidence rate of hematoma was significantly lower in group 2 versus group 1 (p = 0.014), the mean procedure time (minutes) and the median hospital stay (days) were significantly higher in group 1 versus group 2 (t(98) = − 2.631, p = 0.01, and U = 2.403, p = 0.018, respectively), and the c-reactive protein pre-procedure and the c-reactive protein post-procedure were significantly lower in group 2 versus group 1 (U = -2.969, p = 0.003, and U = -2.674, p = 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a lower incidence rate of large bore arterial access complications as hematoma, a shorter procedure time, and a shorter hospital stay with percutaneous closure devices compared to surgical cutdown. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10613603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106136032023-10-31 A comparative study between surgical cut down and percutaneous closure devices in management of large bore arterial access Mousa, Mohamed Ahmed Zahwy, Sherif Samir El Tamara, Ahmed Fathy Samir, Wafed Tantawy, Mahmoud Ahmed CVIR Endovasc Original Article BACKGROUND: Compared to conventional open surgery, minimally invasive catheter-based procedures have less post procedural complications. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) require large bore arterial access. Optimal site management of large bore arterial access is pivotal to reduce the hospital-acquired complications associated with large bore arterial access. We wanted to compare surgical cutdown versus percutaneous closure devices in site management of large bore arterial access. METHODS: Participants planned for TAVI or EVAR with large bore arterial access more than 10 French were included, while participants with history of bypass surgery, malignancies, thrombophilia, or sepsis were excluded. A consecutive sample of 100 participants (mean age 74.66 ± 2.65 years, 61% males) was selected, underwent TAVI or EVAR with surgical cutdown (group 1) versus TAVI or EVAR with Proglide™ percutaneous closure device (group 2). RESULTS: The incidence rate of hematoma was significantly lower in group 2 versus group 1 (p = 0.014), the mean procedure time (minutes) and the median hospital stay (days) were significantly higher in group 1 versus group 2 (t(98) = − 2.631, p = 0.01, and U = 2.403, p = 0.018, respectively), and the c-reactive protein pre-procedure and the c-reactive protein post-procedure were significantly lower in group 2 versus group 1 (U = -2.969, p = 0.003, and U = -2.674, p = 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a lower incidence rate of large bore arterial access complications as hematoma, a shorter procedure time, and a shorter hospital stay with percutaneous closure devices compared to surgical cutdown. Springer International Publishing 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10613603/ /pubmed/37899370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00395-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mousa, Mohamed Ahmed Zahwy, Sherif Samir El Tamara, Ahmed Fathy Samir, Wafed Tantawy, Mahmoud Ahmed A comparative study between surgical cut down and percutaneous closure devices in management of large bore arterial access |
title | A comparative study between surgical cut down and percutaneous closure devices in management of large bore arterial access |
title_full | A comparative study between surgical cut down and percutaneous closure devices in management of large bore arterial access |
title_fullStr | A comparative study between surgical cut down and percutaneous closure devices in management of large bore arterial access |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study between surgical cut down and percutaneous closure devices in management of large bore arterial access |
title_short | A comparative study between surgical cut down and percutaneous closure devices in management of large bore arterial access |
title_sort | comparative study between surgical cut down and percutaneous closure devices in management of large bore arterial access |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37899370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00395-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mousamohamedahmed acomparativestudybetweensurgicalcutdownandpercutaneousclosuredevicesinmanagementoflargeborearterialaccess AT zahwysherifsamirel acomparativestudybetweensurgicalcutdownandpercutaneousclosuredevicesinmanagementoflargeborearterialaccess AT tamaraahmedfathy acomparativestudybetweensurgicalcutdownandpercutaneousclosuredevicesinmanagementoflargeborearterialaccess AT samirwafed acomparativestudybetweensurgicalcutdownandpercutaneousclosuredevicesinmanagementoflargeborearterialaccess AT tantawymahmoudahmed acomparativestudybetweensurgicalcutdownandpercutaneousclosuredevicesinmanagementoflargeborearterialaccess AT mousamohamedahmed comparativestudybetweensurgicalcutdownandpercutaneousclosuredevicesinmanagementoflargeborearterialaccess AT zahwysherifsamirel comparativestudybetweensurgicalcutdownandpercutaneousclosuredevicesinmanagementoflargeborearterialaccess AT tamaraahmedfathy comparativestudybetweensurgicalcutdownandpercutaneousclosuredevicesinmanagementoflargeborearterialaccess AT samirwafed comparativestudybetweensurgicalcutdownandpercutaneousclosuredevicesinmanagementoflargeborearterialaccess AT tantawymahmoudahmed comparativestudybetweensurgicalcutdownandpercutaneousclosuredevicesinmanagementoflargeborearterialaccess |