Cargando…

Odor familiarity and improvement of olfactory identification test in Chinese population

AIMS: This study aimed to design the Chinese Modified Olfactory Identification (CMOI) test based on the Sniffin' Sticks Olfactory Identification (SSOI) test by changing unfamiliar distractors and odors for more familiar ones for the Chinese population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 200 he...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Hao, Wang, Mingyao, Qian, Meiyu, Wei, Hongquan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37908819
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1278668
_version_ 1785128884286521344
author Zhang, Hao
Wang, Mingyao
Qian, Meiyu
Wei, Hongquan
author_facet Zhang, Hao
Wang, Mingyao
Qian, Meiyu
Wei, Hongquan
author_sort Zhang, Hao
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This study aimed to design the Chinese Modified Olfactory Identification (CMOI) test based on the Sniffin' Sticks Olfactory Identification (SSOI) test by changing unfamiliar distractors and odors for more familiar ones for the Chinese population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 200 healthy volunteers (103 males and 97 females, aged 18–65 years, mean age 35.04 years, SD 10.96); in a survey, 100 volunteers rated their familiarity with 121 odors, including all the SSOI test odor descriptors and common odors in Chinese daily life. The SSOI test was modified according to the survey results. The other 100 volunteers were tested three times using the SSOI test, the Modified Distractors Olfactory Identification (MDOI) test established by modifying distractors in the SSOI test, and the CMOI test developed by using familiar unpleasant odors to displace the odors with low correct recognition rates in the MDOI test. We compared the test scores of the volunteers during the modification process. RESULTS: Volunteers were unfamiliar with 31 odor descriptors in the SSOI test; 23 distractors with low familiarity were displaced with more familiar distractors. The three odors with the lowest correct recognition rate in the MDOI test (apple, leather, and pineapple) were displaced with familiar unpleasant odors. The test scores were significantly higher in the CMOI test than in others (p < 0.0001); the correct recognition rate in the CMOI test was significantly higher than in the SSOI test (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The test scores in the CMOI test were significantly improved; it prevented choosing wrongly due to unfamiliarity with an odor and its distractors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10613687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106136872023-10-31 Odor familiarity and improvement of olfactory identification test in Chinese population Zhang, Hao Wang, Mingyao Qian, Meiyu Wei, Hongquan Front Psychol Psychology AIMS: This study aimed to design the Chinese Modified Olfactory Identification (CMOI) test based on the Sniffin' Sticks Olfactory Identification (SSOI) test by changing unfamiliar distractors and odors for more familiar ones for the Chinese population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 200 healthy volunteers (103 males and 97 females, aged 18–65 years, mean age 35.04 years, SD 10.96); in a survey, 100 volunteers rated their familiarity with 121 odors, including all the SSOI test odor descriptors and common odors in Chinese daily life. The SSOI test was modified according to the survey results. The other 100 volunteers were tested three times using the SSOI test, the Modified Distractors Olfactory Identification (MDOI) test established by modifying distractors in the SSOI test, and the CMOI test developed by using familiar unpleasant odors to displace the odors with low correct recognition rates in the MDOI test. We compared the test scores of the volunteers during the modification process. RESULTS: Volunteers were unfamiliar with 31 odor descriptors in the SSOI test; 23 distractors with low familiarity were displaced with more familiar distractors. The three odors with the lowest correct recognition rate in the MDOI test (apple, leather, and pineapple) were displaced with familiar unpleasant odors. The test scores were significantly higher in the CMOI test than in others (p < 0.0001); the correct recognition rate in the CMOI test was significantly higher than in the SSOI test (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The test scores in the CMOI test were significantly improved; it prevented choosing wrongly due to unfamiliarity with an odor and its distractors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10613687/ /pubmed/37908819 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1278668 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhang, Wang, Qian and Wei. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Zhang, Hao
Wang, Mingyao
Qian, Meiyu
Wei, Hongquan
Odor familiarity and improvement of olfactory identification test in Chinese population
title Odor familiarity and improvement of olfactory identification test in Chinese population
title_full Odor familiarity and improvement of olfactory identification test in Chinese population
title_fullStr Odor familiarity and improvement of olfactory identification test in Chinese population
title_full_unstemmed Odor familiarity and improvement of olfactory identification test in Chinese population
title_short Odor familiarity and improvement of olfactory identification test in Chinese population
title_sort odor familiarity and improvement of olfactory identification test in chinese population
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37908819
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1278668
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghao odorfamiliarityandimprovementofolfactoryidentificationtestinchinesepopulation
AT wangmingyao odorfamiliarityandimprovementofolfactoryidentificationtestinchinesepopulation
AT qianmeiyu odorfamiliarityandimprovementofolfactoryidentificationtestinchinesepopulation
AT weihongquan odorfamiliarityandimprovementofolfactoryidentificationtestinchinesepopulation