Cargando…

Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments

EFSA Strategy 2027 outlines the need for fit‐for‐purpose protocols for EFSA generic scientific assessments to aid in delivering trustworthy scientific advice. This EFSA Scientific Committee guidance document helps address this need by providing a harmonised and flexible framework for developing prot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: More, Simon, Bampidis, Vasileios, Benford, Diane, Bragard, Claude, Hernández‐Jerez, Antonio, Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard, Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Panagiotis, Lambré, Claude, Machera, Kyriaki, Mullins, Ewen, Nielsen, Søren Saxmose, Schlatter, Josef, Schrenk, Dieter, Turck, Dominique, Younes, Maged, Kraft, Andrew, Naegeli, Hanspeter, Tsaioun, Katya, Aiassa, Elisa, Arcella, Davide, Barizzone, Fulvio, Cushen, Maeve, Georgiadis, Marios, Gervelmeyer, Andrea, Lanzoni, Anna, Lenzi, Paolo, Lodi, Federica, Martino, Laura, Messens, Winy, Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa, Rizzi, Valentina, Stancanelli, Giuseppe, Supej, Špela, Halldorsson, Thorhallur Ingi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37908452
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8312
_version_ 1785128935060668416
author More, Simon
Bampidis, Vasileios
Benford, Diane
Bragard, Claude
Hernández‐Jerez, Antonio
Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Panagiotis
Lambré, Claude
Machera, Kyriaki
Mullins, Ewen
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Schlatter, Josef
Schrenk, Dieter
Turck, Dominique
Younes, Maged
Kraft, Andrew
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Tsaioun, Katya
Aiassa, Elisa
Arcella, Davide
Barizzone, Fulvio
Cushen, Maeve
Georgiadis, Marios
Gervelmeyer, Andrea
Lanzoni, Anna
Lenzi, Paolo
Lodi, Federica
Martino, Laura
Messens, Winy
Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa
Rizzi, Valentina
Stancanelli, Giuseppe
Supej, Špela
Halldorsson, Thorhallur Ingi
author_facet More, Simon
Bampidis, Vasileios
Benford, Diane
Bragard, Claude
Hernández‐Jerez, Antonio
Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Panagiotis
Lambré, Claude
Machera, Kyriaki
Mullins, Ewen
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Schlatter, Josef
Schrenk, Dieter
Turck, Dominique
Younes, Maged
Kraft, Andrew
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Tsaioun, Katya
Aiassa, Elisa
Arcella, Davide
Barizzone, Fulvio
Cushen, Maeve
Georgiadis, Marios
Gervelmeyer, Andrea
Lanzoni, Anna
Lenzi, Paolo
Lodi, Federica
Martino, Laura
Messens, Winy
Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa
Rizzi, Valentina
Stancanelli, Giuseppe
Supej, Špela
Halldorsson, Thorhallur Ingi
collection PubMed
description EFSA Strategy 2027 outlines the need for fit‐for‐purpose protocols for EFSA generic scientific assessments to aid in delivering trustworthy scientific advice. This EFSA Scientific Committee guidance document helps address this need by providing a harmonised and flexible framework for developing protocols for EFSA generic assessments. The guidance replaces the ‘Draft framework for protocol development for EFSA's scientific assessments’ published in 2020. The two main steps in protocol development are described. The first is problem formulation, which illustrates the objectives of the assessment. Here a new approach to translating the mandated Terms of Reference into scientifically answerable assessment questions and sub‐questions is proposed: the ‘APRIO' paradigm (Agent, Pathway, Receptor, Intervention and Output). Owing to its cross‐cutting nature, this paradigm is considered adaptable and broadly applicable within and across the various EFSA domains and, if applied using the definitions given in this guidance, is expected to help harmonise the problem formulation process and outputs and foster consistency in protocol development. APRIO may also overcome the difficulty of implementing some existing frameworks across the multiple EFSA disciplines, e.g. the PICO/PECO approach (Population, Intervention/Exposure, Comparator, Outcome). Therefore, although not mandatory, APRIO is recommended. The second step in protocol development is the specification of the evidence needs and the methods that will be applied for answering the assessment questions and sub‐questions, including uncertainty analysis. Five possible approaches to answering individual (sub‐)questions are outlined: using evidence from scientific literature and study reports; using data from databases other than bibliographic; using expert judgement informally collected or elicited via semi‐formal or formal expert knowledge elicitation processes; using mathematical/statistical models; and – not covered in this guidance – generating empirical evidence ex novo. The guidance is complemented by a standalone ‘template’ for EFSA protocols that guides the users step by step through the process of planning an EFSA scientific assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10613941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106139412023-10-31 Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments More, Simon Bampidis, Vasileios Benford, Diane Bragard, Claude Hernández‐Jerez, Antonio Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Panagiotis Lambré, Claude Machera, Kyriaki Mullins, Ewen Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Schlatter, Josef Schrenk, Dieter Turck, Dominique Younes, Maged Kraft, Andrew Naegeli, Hanspeter Tsaioun, Katya Aiassa, Elisa Arcella, Davide Barizzone, Fulvio Cushen, Maeve Georgiadis, Marios Gervelmeyer, Andrea Lanzoni, Anna Lenzi, Paolo Lodi, Federica Martino, Laura Messens, Winy Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa Rizzi, Valentina Stancanelli, Giuseppe Supej, Špela Halldorsson, Thorhallur Ingi EFSA J Guidance EFSA Strategy 2027 outlines the need for fit‐for‐purpose protocols for EFSA generic scientific assessments to aid in delivering trustworthy scientific advice. This EFSA Scientific Committee guidance document helps address this need by providing a harmonised and flexible framework for developing protocols for EFSA generic assessments. The guidance replaces the ‘Draft framework for protocol development for EFSA's scientific assessments’ published in 2020. The two main steps in protocol development are described. The first is problem formulation, which illustrates the objectives of the assessment. Here a new approach to translating the mandated Terms of Reference into scientifically answerable assessment questions and sub‐questions is proposed: the ‘APRIO' paradigm (Agent, Pathway, Receptor, Intervention and Output). Owing to its cross‐cutting nature, this paradigm is considered adaptable and broadly applicable within and across the various EFSA domains and, if applied using the definitions given in this guidance, is expected to help harmonise the problem formulation process and outputs and foster consistency in protocol development. APRIO may also overcome the difficulty of implementing some existing frameworks across the multiple EFSA disciplines, e.g. the PICO/PECO approach (Population, Intervention/Exposure, Comparator, Outcome). Therefore, although not mandatory, APRIO is recommended. The second step in protocol development is the specification of the evidence needs and the methods that will be applied for answering the assessment questions and sub‐questions, including uncertainty analysis. Five possible approaches to answering individual (sub‐)questions are outlined: using evidence from scientific literature and study reports; using data from databases other than bibliographic; using expert judgement informally collected or elicited via semi‐formal or formal expert knowledge elicitation processes; using mathematical/statistical models; and – not covered in this guidance – generating empirical evidence ex novo. The guidance is complemented by a standalone ‘template’ for EFSA protocols that guides the users step by step through the process of planning an EFSA scientific assessment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10613941/ /pubmed/37908452 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8312 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Guidance
More, Simon
Bampidis, Vasileios
Benford, Diane
Bragard, Claude
Hernández‐Jerez, Antonio
Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Panagiotis
Lambré, Claude
Machera, Kyriaki
Mullins, Ewen
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Schlatter, Josef
Schrenk, Dieter
Turck, Dominique
Younes, Maged
Kraft, Andrew
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Tsaioun, Katya
Aiassa, Elisa
Arcella, Davide
Barizzone, Fulvio
Cushen, Maeve
Georgiadis, Marios
Gervelmeyer, Andrea
Lanzoni, Anna
Lenzi, Paolo
Lodi, Federica
Martino, Laura
Messens, Winy
Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa
Rizzi, Valentina
Stancanelli, Giuseppe
Supej, Špela
Halldorsson, Thorhallur Ingi
Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments
title Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments
title_full Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments
title_fullStr Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments
title_full_unstemmed Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments
title_short Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments
title_sort guidance on protocol development for efsa generic scientific assessments
topic Guidance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37908452
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8312
work_keys_str_mv AT guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT moresimon guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT bampidisvasileios guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT benforddiane guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT bragardclaude guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT hernandezjerezantonio guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT bennekoususannehougaard guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT koutsoumaniskonstantinospanagiotis guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT lambreclaude guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT macherakyriaki guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT mullinsewen guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT nielsensørensaxmose guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT schlatterjosef guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT schrenkdieter guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT turckdominique guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT younesmaged guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT kraftandrew guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT naegelihanspeter guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT tsaiounkatya guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT aiassaelisa guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT arcelladavide guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT barizzonefulvio guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT cushenmaeve guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT georgiadismarios guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT gervelmeyerandrea guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT lanzonianna guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT lenzipaolo guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT lodifederica guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT martinolaura guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT messenswiny guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT ramosbordajandiluisa guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT rizzivalentina guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT stancanelligiuseppe guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT supejspela guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments
AT halldorssonthorhalluringi guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments