Cargando…
Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments
EFSA Strategy 2027 outlines the need for fit‐for‐purpose protocols for EFSA generic scientific assessments to aid in delivering trustworthy scientific advice. This EFSA Scientific Committee guidance document helps address this need by providing a harmonised and flexible framework for developing prot...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37908452 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8312 |
_version_ | 1785128935060668416 |
---|---|
author | More, Simon Bampidis, Vasileios Benford, Diane Bragard, Claude Hernández‐Jerez, Antonio Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Panagiotis Lambré, Claude Machera, Kyriaki Mullins, Ewen Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Schlatter, Josef Schrenk, Dieter Turck, Dominique Younes, Maged Kraft, Andrew Naegeli, Hanspeter Tsaioun, Katya Aiassa, Elisa Arcella, Davide Barizzone, Fulvio Cushen, Maeve Georgiadis, Marios Gervelmeyer, Andrea Lanzoni, Anna Lenzi, Paolo Lodi, Federica Martino, Laura Messens, Winy Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa Rizzi, Valentina Stancanelli, Giuseppe Supej, Špela Halldorsson, Thorhallur Ingi |
author_facet | More, Simon Bampidis, Vasileios Benford, Diane Bragard, Claude Hernández‐Jerez, Antonio Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Panagiotis Lambré, Claude Machera, Kyriaki Mullins, Ewen Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Schlatter, Josef Schrenk, Dieter Turck, Dominique Younes, Maged Kraft, Andrew Naegeli, Hanspeter Tsaioun, Katya Aiassa, Elisa Arcella, Davide Barizzone, Fulvio Cushen, Maeve Georgiadis, Marios Gervelmeyer, Andrea Lanzoni, Anna Lenzi, Paolo Lodi, Federica Martino, Laura Messens, Winy Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa Rizzi, Valentina Stancanelli, Giuseppe Supej, Špela Halldorsson, Thorhallur Ingi |
collection | PubMed |
description | EFSA Strategy 2027 outlines the need for fit‐for‐purpose protocols for EFSA generic scientific assessments to aid in delivering trustworthy scientific advice. This EFSA Scientific Committee guidance document helps address this need by providing a harmonised and flexible framework for developing protocols for EFSA generic assessments. The guidance replaces the ‘Draft framework for protocol development for EFSA's scientific assessments’ published in 2020. The two main steps in protocol development are described. The first is problem formulation, which illustrates the objectives of the assessment. Here a new approach to translating the mandated Terms of Reference into scientifically answerable assessment questions and sub‐questions is proposed: the ‘APRIO' paradigm (Agent, Pathway, Receptor, Intervention and Output). Owing to its cross‐cutting nature, this paradigm is considered adaptable and broadly applicable within and across the various EFSA domains and, if applied using the definitions given in this guidance, is expected to help harmonise the problem formulation process and outputs and foster consistency in protocol development. APRIO may also overcome the difficulty of implementing some existing frameworks across the multiple EFSA disciplines, e.g. the PICO/PECO approach (Population, Intervention/Exposure, Comparator, Outcome). Therefore, although not mandatory, APRIO is recommended. The second step in protocol development is the specification of the evidence needs and the methods that will be applied for answering the assessment questions and sub‐questions, including uncertainty analysis. Five possible approaches to answering individual (sub‐)questions are outlined: using evidence from scientific literature and study reports; using data from databases other than bibliographic; using expert judgement informally collected or elicited via semi‐formal or formal expert knowledge elicitation processes; using mathematical/statistical models; and – not covered in this guidance – generating empirical evidence ex novo. The guidance is complemented by a standalone ‘template’ for EFSA protocols that guides the users step by step through the process of planning an EFSA scientific assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10613941 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106139412023-10-31 Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments More, Simon Bampidis, Vasileios Benford, Diane Bragard, Claude Hernández‐Jerez, Antonio Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Panagiotis Lambré, Claude Machera, Kyriaki Mullins, Ewen Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Schlatter, Josef Schrenk, Dieter Turck, Dominique Younes, Maged Kraft, Andrew Naegeli, Hanspeter Tsaioun, Katya Aiassa, Elisa Arcella, Davide Barizzone, Fulvio Cushen, Maeve Georgiadis, Marios Gervelmeyer, Andrea Lanzoni, Anna Lenzi, Paolo Lodi, Federica Martino, Laura Messens, Winy Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa Rizzi, Valentina Stancanelli, Giuseppe Supej, Špela Halldorsson, Thorhallur Ingi EFSA J Guidance EFSA Strategy 2027 outlines the need for fit‐for‐purpose protocols for EFSA generic scientific assessments to aid in delivering trustworthy scientific advice. This EFSA Scientific Committee guidance document helps address this need by providing a harmonised and flexible framework for developing protocols for EFSA generic assessments. The guidance replaces the ‘Draft framework for protocol development for EFSA's scientific assessments’ published in 2020. The two main steps in protocol development are described. The first is problem formulation, which illustrates the objectives of the assessment. Here a new approach to translating the mandated Terms of Reference into scientifically answerable assessment questions and sub‐questions is proposed: the ‘APRIO' paradigm (Agent, Pathway, Receptor, Intervention and Output). Owing to its cross‐cutting nature, this paradigm is considered adaptable and broadly applicable within and across the various EFSA domains and, if applied using the definitions given in this guidance, is expected to help harmonise the problem formulation process and outputs and foster consistency in protocol development. APRIO may also overcome the difficulty of implementing some existing frameworks across the multiple EFSA disciplines, e.g. the PICO/PECO approach (Population, Intervention/Exposure, Comparator, Outcome). Therefore, although not mandatory, APRIO is recommended. The second step in protocol development is the specification of the evidence needs and the methods that will be applied for answering the assessment questions and sub‐questions, including uncertainty analysis. Five possible approaches to answering individual (sub‐)questions are outlined: using evidence from scientific literature and study reports; using data from databases other than bibliographic; using expert judgement informally collected or elicited via semi‐formal or formal expert knowledge elicitation processes; using mathematical/statistical models; and – not covered in this guidance – generating empirical evidence ex novo. The guidance is complemented by a standalone ‘template’ for EFSA protocols that guides the users step by step through the process of planning an EFSA scientific assessment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10613941/ /pubmed/37908452 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8312 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Guidance More, Simon Bampidis, Vasileios Benford, Diane Bragard, Claude Hernández‐Jerez, Antonio Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Panagiotis Lambré, Claude Machera, Kyriaki Mullins, Ewen Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Schlatter, Josef Schrenk, Dieter Turck, Dominique Younes, Maged Kraft, Andrew Naegeli, Hanspeter Tsaioun, Katya Aiassa, Elisa Arcella, Davide Barizzone, Fulvio Cushen, Maeve Georgiadis, Marios Gervelmeyer, Andrea Lanzoni, Anna Lenzi, Paolo Lodi, Federica Martino, Laura Messens, Winy Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa Rizzi, Valentina Stancanelli, Giuseppe Supej, Špela Halldorsson, Thorhallur Ingi Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments |
title | Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments |
title_full | Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments |
title_fullStr | Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments |
title_full_unstemmed | Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments |
title_short | Guidance on protocol development for EFSA generic scientific assessments |
title_sort | guidance on protocol development for efsa generic scientific assessments |
topic | Guidance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37908452 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT moresimon guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT bampidisvasileios guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT benforddiane guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT bragardclaude guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT hernandezjerezantonio guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT bennekoususannehougaard guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT koutsoumaniskonstantinospanagiotis guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT lambreclaude guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT macherakyriaki guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT mullinsewen guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT nielsensørensaxmose guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT schlatterjosef guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT schrenkdieter guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT turckdominique guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT younesmaged guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT kraftandrew guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT naegelihanspeter guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT tsaiounkatya guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT aiassaelisa guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT arcelladavide guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT barizzonefulvio guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT cushenmaeve guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT georgiadismarios guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT gervelmeyerandrea guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT lanzonianna guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT lenzipaolo guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT lodifederica guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT martinolaura guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT messenswiny guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT ramosbordajandiluisa guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT rizzivalentina guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT stancanelligiuseppe guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT supejspela guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments AT halldorssonthorhalluringi guidanceonprotocoldevelopmentforefsagenericscientificassessments |