Cargando…
Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review
BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have large individual differences, unclear risk stratification, and imperfect treatment plans. Risk prediction models are helpful for the dynamic assessment of patients' prognostic risk and early intensive therapy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Science Publishers
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10614113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644795 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1381612829666230830105740 |
_version_ | 1785128963755999232 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Shanshan Yang, Zhihua Liu, Yangxi Bi, Yingfei Liu, Yu Zhang, Zeyu Zhang, Xuan Jia, Zhuangzhuang Wang, Xianliang Mao, Jingyuan |
author_facet | Lin, Shanshan Yang, Zhihua Liu, Yangxi Bi, Yingfei Liu, Yu Zhang, Zeyu Zhang, Xuan Jia, Zhuangzhuang Wang, Xianliang Mao, Jingyuan |
author_sort | Lin, Shanshan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have large individual differences, unclear risk stratification, and imperfect treatment plans. Risk prediction models are helpful for the dynamic assessment of patients' prognostic risk and early intensive therapy of high-risk patients. The purpose of this study is to systematically summarize the existing risk prediction models and novel prognostic factors for HFpEF, to provide a reference for the construction of convenient and efficient HFpEF risk prediction models. METHODS: Studies on risk prediction models and prognostic factors for HFpEF were systematically searched in relevant databases including PubMed and Embase. The retrieval time was from inception to February 1, 2023. The Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. The predictive value of risk prediction models for end outcomes was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, the area under the curve, C-statistic, C-index, etc. In the literature screening process, potential novel prognostic factors with high value were explored. RESULTS: A total of 21 eligible HFpEF risk prediction models and 22 relevant studies were included. Except for 2 studies with a high risk of bias and 2 studies with a moderate risk of bias, other studies that proposed risk prediction models had a low risk of bias overall. Potential novel prognostic factors for HFpEF were classified and described in terms of demographic characteristics (age, sex, and race), lifestyle (physical activity, body mass index, weight change, and smoking history), laboratory tests (biomarkers), physical inspection (blood pressure, electrocardiogram, imaging examination), and comorbidities. CONCLUSION: It is of great significance to explore the potential novel prognostic factors of HFpEF and build a more convenient and efficient risk prediction model for improving the overall prognosis of patients. This review can provide a substantial reference for further research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10614113 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Bentham Science Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106141132023-10-31 Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review Lin, Shanshan Yang, Zhihua Liu, Yangxi Bi, Yingfei Liu, Yu Zhang, Zeyu Zhang, Xuan Jia, Zhuangzhuang Wang, Xianliang Mao, Jingyuan Curr Pharm Des Medicine, Immunology, Inflammation & Allergy, Pharmacology BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have large individual differences, unclear risk stratification, and imperfect treatment plans. Risk prediction models are helpful for the dynamic assessment of patients' prognostic risk and early intensive therapy of high-risk patients. The purpose of this study is to systematically summarize the existing risk prediction models and novel prognostic factors for HFpEF, to provide a reference for the construction of convenient and efficient HFpEF risk prediction models. METHODS: Studies on risk prediction models and prognostic factors for HFpEF were systematically searched in relevant databases including PubMed and Embase. The retrieval time was from inception to February 1, 2023. The Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. The predictive value of risk prediction models for end outcomes was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, the area under the curve, C-statistic, C-index, etc. In the literature screening process, potential novel prognostic factors with high value were explored. RESULTS: A total of 21 eligible HFpEF risk prediction models and 22 relevant studies were included. Except for 2 studies with a high risk of bias and 2 studies with a moderate risk of bias, other studies that proposed risk prediction models had a low risk of bias overall. Potential novel prognostic factors for HFpEF were classified and described in terms of demographic characteristics (age, sex, and race), lifestyle (physical activity, body mass index, weight change, and smoking history), laboratory tests (biomarkers), physical inspection (blood pressure, electrocardiogram, imaging examination), and comorbidities. CONCLUSION: It is of great significance to explore the potential novel prognostic factors of HFpEF and build a more convenient and efficient risk prediction model for improving the overall prognosis of patients. This review can provide a substantial reference for further research. Bentham Science Publishers 2023-09-25 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10614113/ /pubmed/37644795 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1381612829666230830105740 Text en © 2023 Bentham Science Publishers https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode) |
spellingShingle | Medicine, Immunology, Inflammation & Allergy, Pharmacology Lin, Shanshan Yang, Zhihua Liu, Yangxi Bi, Yingfei Liu, Yu Zhang, Zeyu Zhang, Xuan Jia, Zhuangzhuang Wang, Xianliang Mao, Jingyuan Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review |
title | Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review |
title_full | Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review |
title_fullStr | Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review |
title_short | Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review |
title_sort | risk prediction models and novel prognostic factors for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic and comprehensive review |
topic | Medicine, Immunology, Inflammation & Allergy, Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10614113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644795 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1381612829666230830105740 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linshanshan riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview AT yangzhihua riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview AT liuyangxi riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview AT biyingfei riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview AT liuyu riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview AT zhangzeyu riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview AT zhangxuan riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview AT jiazhuangzhuang riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview AT wangxianliang riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview AT maojingyuan riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview |