Cargando…

Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have large individual differences, unclear risk stratification, and imperfect treatment plans. Risk prediction models are helpful for the dynamic assessment of patients' prognostic risk and early intensive therapy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Shanshan, Yang, Zhihua, Liu, Yangxi, Bi, Yingfei, Liu, Yu, Zhang, Zeyu, Zhang, Xuan, Jia, Zhuangzhuang, Wang, Xianliang, Mao, Jingyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Science Publishers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10614113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644795
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1381612829666230830105740
_version_ 1785128963755999232
author Lin, Shanshan
Yang, Zhihua
Liu, Yangxi
Bi, Yingfei
Liu, Yu
Zhang, Zeyu
Zhang, Xuan
Jia, Zhuangzhuang
Wang, Xianliang
Mao, Jingyuan
author_facet Lin, Shanshan
Yang, Zhihua
Liu, Yangxi
Bi, Yingfei
Liu, Yu
Zhang, Zeyu
Zhang, Xuan
Jia, Zhuangzhuang
Wang, Xianliang
Mao, Jingyuan
author_sort Lin, Shanshan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have large individual differences, unclear risk stratification, and imperfect treatment plans. Risk prediction models are helpful for the dynamic assessment of patients' prognostic risk and early intensive therapy of high-risk patients. The purpose of this study is to systematically summarize the existing risk prediction models and novel prognostic factors for HFpEF, to provide a reference for the construction of convenient and efficient HFpEF risk prediction models. METHODS: Studies on risk prediction models and prognostic factors for HFpEF were systematically searched in relevant databases including PubMed and Embase. The retrieval time was from inception to February 1, 2023. The Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. The predictive value of risk prediction models for end outcomes was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, the area under the curve, C-statistic, C-index, etc. In the literature screening process, potential novel prognostic factors with high value were explored. RESULTS: A total of 21 eligible HFpEF risk prediction models and 22 relevant studies were included. Except for 2 studies with a high risk of bias and 2 studies with a moderate risk of bias, other studies that proposed risk prediction models had a low risk of bias overall. Potential novel prognostic factors for HFpEF were classified and described in terms of demographic characteristics (age, sex, and race), lifestyle (physical activity, body mass index, weight change, and smoking history), laboratory tests (biomarkers), physical inspection (blood pressure, electrocardiogram, imaging examination), and comorbidities. CONCLUSION: It is of great significance to explore the potential novel prognostic factors of HFpEF and build a more convenient and efficient risk prediction model for improving the overall prognosis of patients. This review can provide a substantial reference for further research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10614113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Bentham Science Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106141132023-10-31 Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review Lin, Shanshan Yang, Zhihua Liu, Yangxi Bi, Yingfei Liu, Yu Zhang, Zeyu Zhang, Xuan Jia, Zhuangzhuang Wang, Xianliang Mao, Jingyuan Curr Pharm Des Medicine, Immunology, Inflammation & Allergy, Pharmacology BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have large individual differences, unclear risk stratification, and imperfect treatment plans. Risk prediction models are helpful for the dynamic assessment of patients' prognostic risk and early intensive therapy of high-risk patients. The purpose of this study is to systematically summarize the existing risk prediction models and novel prognostic factors for HFpEF, to provide a reference for the construction of convenient and efficient HFpEF risk prediction models. METHODS: Studies on risk prediction models and prognostic factors for HFpEF were systematically searched in relevant databases including PubMed and Embase. The retrieval time was from inception to February 1, 2023. The Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. The predictive value of risk prediction models for end outcomes was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, the area under the curve, C-statistic, C-index, etc. In the literature screening process, potential novel prognostic factors with high value were explored. RESULTS: A total of 21 eligible HFpEF risk prediction models and 22 relevant studies were included. Except for 2 studies with a high risk of bias and 2 studies with a moderate risk of bias, other studies that proposed risk prediction models had a low risk of bias overall. Potential novel prognostic factors for HFpEF were classified and described in terms of demographic characteristics (age, sex, and race), lifestyle (physical activity, body mass index, weight change, and smoking history), laboratory tests (biomarkers), physical inspection (blood pressure, electrocardiogram, imaging examination), and comorbidities. CONCLUSION: It is of great significance to explore the potential novel prognostic factors of HFpEF and build a more convenient and efficient risk prediction model for improving the overall prognosis of patients. This review can provide a substantial reference for further research. Bentham Science Publishers 2023-09-25 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10614113/ /pubmed/37644795 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1381612829666230830105740 Text en © 2023 Bentham Science Publishers https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode)
spellingShingle Medicine, Immunology, Inflammation & Allergy, Pharmacology
Lin, Shanshan
Yang, Zhihua
Liu, Yangxi
Bi, Yingfei
Liu, Yu
Zhang, Zeyu
Zhang, Xuan
Jia, Zhuangzhuang
Wang, Xianliang
Mao, Jingyuan
Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review
title Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review
title_full Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review
title_fullStr Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review
title_full_unstemmed Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review
title_short Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review
title_sort risk prediction models and novel prognostic factors for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic and comprehensive review
topic Medicine, Immunology, Inflammation & Allergy, Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10614113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37644795
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1381612829666230830105740
work_keys_str_mv AT linshanshan riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview
AT yangzhihua riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview
AT liuyangxi riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview
AT biyingfei riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview
AT liuyu riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview
AT zhangzeyu riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview
AT zhangxuan riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview
AT jiazhuangzhuang riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview
AT wangxianliang riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview
AT maojingyuan riskpredictionmodelsandnovelprognosticfactorsforheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractionasystematicandcomprehensivereview