Cargando…

The Guiding Significance of Ocular Biometry in Evaluating the Refractive Status of Preschool Children

INTRODUCTIONS: This study aimed to analyze the correlation between refractive status and ocular biological parameters in preschool-age children (3–6 years old), establish a regression curve, guide the clinical judgment of children’s refractive status, and improve the accuracy of refractive screening...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Ya, Su, Ming, Liang, Lingling, Shi, Bingjie, Gong, Dongmei, Wu, Yidan, Zhang, Junying, Wang, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10614507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37666230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000533782
_version_ 1785129044859158528
author Zhang, Ya
Su, Ming
Liang, Lingling
Shi, Bingjie
Gong, Dongmei
Wu, Yidan
Zhang, Junying
Wang, Ming
author_facet Zhang, Ya
Su, Ming
Liang, Lingling
Shi, Bingjie
Gong, Dongmei
Wu, Yidan
Zhang, Junying
Wang, Ming
author_sort Zhang, Ya
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTIONS: This study aimed to analyze the correlation between refractive status and ocular biological parameters in preschool-age children (3–6 years old), establish a regression curve, guide the clinical judgment of children’s refractive status, and improve the accuracy of refractive screening for this age group. METHODS: A total of 508 children, aged 3–6 years, were admitted to the hospital, exhibiting symptoms of ametropia and a need for dilation optometry. Among these, 326 children were included in the statistics group, having been examined between August 2021 and October 2022, and 182 children were included in the validation group, having been examined between November 2022 and March 2023. Using IOL Master700, ocular biometry parameters were measured for all participants, including axial length (AL), keratometry readings (K1 and K2), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and central corneal thickness (CCT). One percent atropine sulfate eye gel was administered, and then the spherical equivalent (SE) was calculated by Bennett’s formula. The correlation between SE and other ocular biometrics was analyzed, followed by the establishment of an SE prediction equation. The SE prediction equation was used to calculate the spherical equivalent (SE#) using ocular biometry data from the validation group, and the consistency between SE and SE# was evaluated. RESULTS: SE showed a negative correlation with AL/CR (r = −0.936), AL (r = −0.811), ACD (r = −0.500), age (r = −0.396), and Km (r = −0.213) (p < 0.001), and positive correlation with LT (r = 0.301), LP (r = 0.176) (p < 0.001). A multiple linear regression equation was established for SE using the stepwise selection method, SE = 49.232 – 23.583 × AL/CR + 1.703 × ACD + 0.589 × Km − 0.609 × LP + 1.103 × LT (R(2) = 0.997). Based on the regression equation, the predicted SE# highly correlated with SE after cycloplegia in the validation group (r = 0.998, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The main ocular biological factors of ocular diopter in children aged 3–6 years are AL/CR, ACD, Km, LP, and LT, which are jointly influenced by multiple factors. Ocular biometry is a reliable predictor of real refraction among children aged 3–6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10614507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106145072023-10-31 The Guiding Significance of Ocular Biometry in Evaluating the Refractive Status of Preschool Children Zhang, Ya Su, Ming Liang, Lingling Shi, Bingjie Gong, Dongmei Wu, Yidan Zhang, Junying Wang, Ming Ophthalmic Res Research Article INTRODUCTIONS: This study aimed to analyze the correlation between refractive status and ocular biological parameters in preschool-age children (3–6 years old), establish a regression curve, guide the clinical judgment of children’s refractive status, and improve the accuracy of refractive screening for this age group. METHODS: A total of 508 children, aged 3–6 years, were admitted to the hospital, exhibiting symptoms of ametropia and a need for dilation optometry. Among these, 326 children were included in the statistics group, having been examined between August 2021 and October 2022, and 182 children were included in the validation group, having been examined between November 2022 and March 2023. Using IOL Master700, ocular biometry parameters were measured for all participants, including axial length (AL), keratometry readings (K1 and K2), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and central corneal thickness (CCT). One percent atropine sulfate eye gel was administered, and then the spherical equivalent (SE) was calculated by Bennett’s formula. The correlation between SE and other ocular biometrics was analyzed, followed by the establishment of an SE prediction equation. The SE prediction equation was used to calculate the spherical equivalent (SE#) using ocular biometry data from the validation group, and the consistency between SE and SE# was evaluated. RESULTS: SE showed a negative correlation with AL/CR (r = −0.936), AL (r = −0.811), ACD (r = −0.500), age (r = −0.396), and Km (r = −0.213) (p < 0.001), and positive correlation with LT (r = 0.301), LP (r = 0.176) (p < 0.001). A multiple linear regression equation was established for SE using the stepwise selection method, SE = 49.232 – 23.583 × AL/CR + 1.703 × ACD + 0.589 × Km − 0.609 × LP + 1.103 × LT (R(2) = 0.997). Based on the regression equation, the predicted SE# highly correlated with SE after cycloplegia in the validation group (r = 0.998, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The main ocular biological factors of ocular diopter in children aged 3–6 years are AL/CR, ACD, Km, LP, and LT, which are jointly influenced by multiple factors. Ocular biometry is a reliable predictor of real refraction among children aged 3–6. S. Karger AG 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10614507/ /pubmed/37666230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000533782 Text en © 2023 The Author(s).Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC) (http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Ya
Su, Ming
Liang, Lingling
Shi, Bingjie
Gong, Dongmei
Wu, Yidan
Zhang, Junying
Wang, Ming
The Guiding Significance of Ocular Biometry in Evaluating the Refractive Status of Preschool Children
title The Guiding Significance of Ocular Biometry in Evaluating the Refractive Status of Preschool Children
title_full The Guiding Significance of Ocular Biometry in Evaluating the Refractive Status of Preschool Children
title_fullStr The Guiding Significance of Ocular Biometry in Evaluating the Refractive Status of Preschool Children
title_full_unstemmed The Guiding Significance of Ocular Biometry in Evaluating the Refractive Status of Preschool Children
title_short The Guiding Significance of Ocular Biometry in Evaluating the Refractive Status of Preschool Children
title_sort guiding significance of ocular biometry in evaluating the refractive status of preschool children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10614507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37666230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000533782
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangya theguidingsignificanceofocularbiometryinevaluatingtherefractivestatusofpreschoolchildren
AT suming theguidingsignificanceofocularbiometryinevaluatingtherefractivestatusofpreschoolchildren
AT lianglingling theguidingsignificanceofocularbiometryinevaluatingtherefractivestatusofpreschoolchildren
AT shibingjie theguidingsignificanceofocularbiometryinevaluatingtherefractivestatusofpreschoolchildren
AT gongdongmei theguidingsignificanceofocularbiometryinevaluatingtherefractivestatusofpreschoolchildren
AT wuyidan theguidingsignificanceofocularbiometryinevaluatingtherefractivestatusofpreschoolchildren
AT zhangjunying theguidingsignificanceofocularbiometryinevaluatingtherefractivestatusofpreschoolchildren
AT wangming theguidingsignificanceofocularbiometryinevaluatingtherefractivestatusofpreschoolchildren
AT zhangya guidingsignificanceofocularbiometryinevaluatingtherefractivestatusofpreschoolchildren
AT suming guidingsignificanceofocularbiometryinevaluatingtherefractivestatusofpreschoolchildren
AT lianglingling guidingsignificanceofocularbiometryinevaluatingtherefractivestatusofpreschoolchildren
AT shibingjie guidingsignificanceofocularbiometryinevaluatingtherefractivestatusofpreschoolchildren
AT gongdongmei guidingsignificanceofocularbiometryinevaluatingtherefractivestatusofpreschoolchildren
AT wuyidan guidingsignificanceofocularbiometryinevaluatingtherefractivestatusofpreschoolchildren
AT zhangjunying guidingsignificanceofocularbiometryinevaluatingtherefractivestatusofpreschoolchildren
AT wangming guidingsignificanceofocularbiometryinevaluatingtherefractivestatusofpreschoolchildren