Cargando…

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Manifestations in 13 Cases of Seminal Vesicle Tuberculosis

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the radiographic manifestations of seminal vesicle tuberculosis (SVT) on magnetic resonance imaging to gain a deeper understanding of this disease. METHODS: The clinical symptoms, general conditions, relevant laboratory tests and radiological data of 13 patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gan, Wei, Bi, Yan, Fu, Xuwen, Wei, Jialu, Qi, Min, He, Jintang, Li, Xiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10614662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37908784
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S427561
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the radiographic manifestations of seminal vesicle tuberculosis (SVT) on magnetic resonance imaging to gain a deeper understanding of this disease. METHODS: The clinical symptoms, general conditions, relevant laboratory tests and radiological data of 13 patients diagnosed with SVT were collected through bacteriological examination. A descriptive analysis was used to explore the composition ratio and rate values of the collected data. RESULTS: All 13 cases (100.0%) showed isointense signals on T(1)WI and hypointense signals on T(2)WI in the affected seminal vesicles, with the disappearance of the multi-chambered high signal on T(2)WI in normal seminal vesicles. Eight cases (61.5%) showed diffusion restriction on DWI of the affected seminal vesicle and significant enhancement on the contrast scan, whereas five cases (38.5%) showed unrestricted diffusion and mild enhancement on the contrast scan. Patients with significant enhancements exhibited higher counts and neutrophil percentages than patients with mild enhancements, with statistically significant differences (Z = 2.196, P = 0.030; Z = 2.781, P = 0.003, respectively). The counts and percentage of lymphocytes, CD3(+)T cells and CD4(+)T cells were significantly lower in patients with significant enhancements than in those with mild enhancements, with statistically significant differences (Z = −2.196, P = 0.030; Z = −2.928, P = 0.002; Z = −2.928, P = 0.002; Z = −2.928, P = 0.002, respectively). Patients with significant enhancements were more likely to have active pulmonary tuberculosis than those with mild enhancements, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance imaging reveals distinct radiographic features of SVT, and variations in imaging presentations can indicate a patient’s immune status.