Cargando…
Domestic and wild animal samples and diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2
From the first cases in 2019, COVID-19 infections caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have resulted in over 6 million human deaths in a worldwide pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 is commonly spread from human to human through close contact and is capable of infecting both huma...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10614713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37779468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2023.2263864 |
_version_ | 1785129079394009088 |
---|---|
author | Miller, Megan R. Braun, Elias Ip, Hon S. Tyson, Gregory H. |
author_facet | Miller, Megan R. Braun, Elias Ip, Hon S. Tyson, Gregory H. |
author_sort | Miller, Megan R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | From the first cases in 2019, COVID-19 infections caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have resulted in over 6 million human deaths in a worldwide pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 is commonly spread from human to human through close contact and is capable of infecting both humans and animals. Worldwide, there have been over 675 animal outbreaks reported that resulted in over 2000 animal infections including domestic and wild animals. As the role of animal infections in the transmission, pathogenesis, and evolution of SARS-CoV-2 is still unfolding, accurate and reliable animal diagnostic tests are critical to aid in managing both human and animal health. This review highlights key animal samples and the three main diagnostic approaches used for animal testing: PCR, serology, and Next Generation Sequencing. Diagnostic results help inform (often difficult) clinical decision-making, but also possible ways to mitigate spread among pets, food supplies, or wildlife. A One Health approach has been key to monitoring the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, as consistent human-animal interactions can lead to novel variants. Having multiple animal diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 available is critical to ensure human, animal, and environmental health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10614713 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106147132023-10-31 Domestic and wild animal samples and diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 Miller, Megan R. Braun, Elias Ip, Hon S. Tyson, Gregory H. Vet Q Review Article From the first cases in 2019, COVID-19 infections caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have resulted in over 6 million human deaths in a worldwide pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 is commonly spread from human to human through close contact and is capable of infecting both humans and animals. Worldwide, there have been over 675 animal outbreaks reported that resulted in over 2000 animal infections including domestic and wild animals. As the role of animal infections in the transmission, pathogenesis, and evolution of SARS-CoV-2 is still unfolding, accurate and reliable animal diagnostic tests are critical to aid in managing both human and animal health. This review highlights key animal samples and the three main diagnostic approaches used for animal testing: PCR, serology, and Next Generation Sequencing. Diagnostic results help inform (often difficult) clinical decision-making, but also possible ways to mitigate spread among pets, food supplies, or wildlife. A One Health approach has been key to monitoring the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, as consistent human-animal interactions can lead to novel variants. Having multiple animal diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 available is critical to ensure human, animal, and environmental health. Taylor & Francis 2023-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10614713/ /pubmed/37779468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2023.2263864 Text en This work was authored as part of the Contributor’s official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is availablefor such works under U.S. Law https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Miller, Megan R. Braun, Elias Ip, Hon S. Tyson, Gregory H. Domestic and wild animal samples and diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 |
title | Domestic and wild animal samples and diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full | Domestic and wild animal samples and diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 |
title_fullStr | Domestic and wild animal samples and diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full_unstemmed | Domestic and wild animal samples and diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 |
title_short | Domestic and wild animal samples and diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 |
title_sort | domestic and wild animal samples and diagnostic testing for sars-cov-2 |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10614713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37779468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2023.2263864 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millermeganr domesticandwildanimalsamplesanddiagnostictestingforsarscov2 AT braunelias domesticandwildanimalsamplesanddiagnostictestingforsarscov2 AT iphons domesticandwildanimalsamplesanddiagnostictestingforsarscov2 AT tysongregoryh domesticandwildanimalsamplesanddiagnostictestingforsarscov2 |