Cargando…

Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka

INTRODUCTION: Global evidence suggests that high out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure negatively affects health service utilization and creates an economic burden on households during pregnancy. This study aimed to estimate the magnitude and associated factors of OOP expenditure for antenatal care (ANC)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunarathna, Sajan Praveena, Wickramasinghe, Nuwan Darshana, Agampodi, Thilini Chanchala, Prasanna, Indika Ruwan, Agampodi, Suneth Buddhika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Global Health: Science and Practice 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37903576
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00410
_version_ 1785129180726296576
author Gunarathna, Sajan Praveena
Wickramasinghe, Nuwan Darshana
Agampodi, Thilini Chanchala
Prasanna, Indika Ruwan
Agampodi, Suneth Buddhika
author_facet Gunarathna, Sajan Praveena
Wickramasinghe, Nuwan Darshana
Agampodi, Thilini Chanchala
Prasanna, Indika Ruwan
Agampodi, Suneth Buddhika
author_sort Gunarathna, Sajan Praveena
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Global evidence suggests that high out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure negatively affects health service utilization and creates an economic burden on households during pregnancy. This study aimed to estimate the magnitude and associated factors of OOP expenditure for antenatal care (ANC) in a rural Sri Lankan setting by following up with a large pregnancy cohort (The Rajarata Pregnancy Cohort [RaPCo]) in Anuradhapura District, Sri Lanka. METHODS: Data were collected from July 2019 to May 2020. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect socioeconomic data and OOP expenditures in the first trimester. Self-administered questionnaires were used monthly to collect OOP expenditures in the second and third trimesters. In-depth financial information of 1,558 pregnant women was analyzed using descriptive statistics, nonparametric statistics, and a multiple linear regression model. RESULTS: The majority of participants used both government and private health facilities for ANC. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) OOP expenditure per ANC visit was US$4.18 (US$4.19), and the mean (SD) OOP expenditure for total ANC was US$57.74 (US$80.96). Pregnant women who used only free government health services also spent 28% and 14% of OOP expenditure on medicines and laboratory investigations. Household income (P<.001), household expenditure (P<.1), used health care mode (P<.05), maternal morbidities (P<.05), and the number of previous pregnancies (P<.1) were the statistically significant independent predictors of OOP expenditure. OOP expenditure per visit for ANC equals half of the daily household expenditure. CONCLUSION: Despite having freely available government health facilities, most pregnant women tend to use both government and private health facilities and incur higher OOP expenditure. Free government health care users also incur a direct medical OOP expenditure for medicines and laboratory investigations. Monthly household income, expenditure, used health care mode, maternal morbidities, and the number of previous pregnancies are independent predictors of OOP expenditure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10615247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Global Health: Science and Practice
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106152472023-10-31 Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka Gunarathna, Sajan Praveena Wickramasinghe, Nuwan Darshana Agampodi, Thilini Chanchala Prasanna, Indika Ruwan Agampodi, Suneth Buddhika Glob Health Sci Pract Original Article INTRODUCTION: Global evidence suggests that high out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure negatively affects health service utilization and creates an economic burden on households during pregnancy. This study aimed to estimate the magnitude and associated factors of OOP expenditure for antenatal care (ANC) in a rural Sri Lankan setting by following up with a large pregnancy cohort (The Rajarata Pregnancy Cohort [RaPCo]) in Anuradhapura District, Sri Lanka. METHODS: Data were collected from July 2019 to May 2020. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect socioeconomic data and OOP expenditures in the first trimester. Self-administered questionnaires were used monthly to collect OOP expenditures in the second and third trimesters. In-depth financial information of 1,558 pregnant women was analyzed using descriptive statistics, nonparametric statistics, and a multiple linear regression model. RESULTS: The majority of participants used both government and private health facilities for ANC. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) OOP expenditure per ANC visit was US$4.18 (US$4.19), and the mean (SD) OOP expenditure for total ANC was US$57.74 (US$80.96). Pregnant women who used only free government health services also spent 28% and 14% of OOP expenditure on medicines and laboratory investigations. Household income (P<.001), household expenditure (P<.1), used health care mode (P<.05), maternal morbidities (P<.05), and the number of previous pregnancies (P<.1) were the statistically significant independent predictors of OOP expenditure. OOP expenditure per visit for ANC equals half of the daily household expenditure. CONCLUSION: Despite having freely available government health facilities, most pregnant women tend to use both government and private health facilities and incur higher OOP expenditure. Free government health care users also incur a direct medical OOP expenditure for medicines and laboratory investigations. Monthly household income, expenditure, used health care mode, maternal morbidities, and the number of previous pregnancies are independent predictors of OOP expenditure. Global Health: Science and Practice 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10615247/ /pubmed/37903576 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00410 Text en © Gunarathna et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00410
spellingShingle Original Article
Gunarathna, Sajan Praveena
Wickramasinghe, Nuwan Darshana
Agampodi, Thilini Chanchala
Prasanna, Indika Ruwan
Agampodi, Suneth Buddhika
Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka
title Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka
title_full Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka
title_fullStr Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka
title_full_unstemmed Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka
title_short Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka
title_sort out-of-pocket expenditure for antenatal care amid free health care provision: evidence from a large pregnancy cohort in rural sri lanka
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37903576
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00410
work_keys_str_mv AT gunarathnasajanpraveena outofpocketexpenditureforantenatalcareamidfreehealthcareprovisionevidencefromalargepregnancycohortinruralsrilanka
AT wickramasinghenuwandarshana outofpocketexpenditureforantenatalcareamidfreehealthcareprovisionevidencefromalargepregnancycohortinruralsrilanka
AT agampodithilinichanchala outofpocketexpenditureforantenatalcareamidfreehealthcareprovisionevidencefromalargepregnancycohortinruralsrilanka
AT prasannaindikaruwan outofpocketexpenditureforantenatalcareamidfreehealthcareprovisionevidencefromalargepregnancycohortinruralsrilanka
AT agampodisunethbuddhika outofpocketexpenditureforantenatalcareamidfreehealthcareprovisionevidencefromalargepregnancycohortinruralsrilanka