Cargando…
Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka
INTRODUCTION: Global evidence suggests that high out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure negatively affects health service utilization and creates an economic burden on households during pregnancy. This study aimed to estimate the magnitude and associated factors of OOP expenditure for antenatal care (ANC)...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Global Health: Science and Practice
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37903576 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00410 |
_version_ | 1785129180726296576 |
---|---|
author | Gunarathna, Sajan Praveena Wickramasinghe, Nuwan Darshana Agampodi, Thilini Chanchala Prasanna, Indika Ruwan Agampodi, Suneth Buddhika |
author_facet | Gunarathna, Sajan Praveena Wickramasinghe, Nuwan Darshana Agampodi, Thilini Chanchala Prasanna, Indika Ruwan Agampodi, Suneth Buddhika |
author_sort | Gunarathna, Sajan Praveena |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Global evidence suggests that high out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure negatively affects health service utilization and creates an economic burden on households during pregnancy. This study aimed to estimate the magnitude and associated factors of OOP expenditure for antenatal care (ANC) in a rural Sri Lankan setting by following up with a large pregnancy cohort (The Rajarata Pregnancy Cohort [RaPCo]) in Anuradhapura District, Sri Lanka. METHODS: Data were collected from July 2019 to May 2020. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect socioeconomic data and OOP expenditures in the first trimester. Self-administered questionnaires were used monthly to collect OOP expenditures in the second and third trimesters. In-depth financial information of 1,558 pregnant women was analyzed using descriptive statistics, nonparametric statistics, and a multiple linear regression model. RESULTS: The majority of participants used both government and private health facilities for ANC. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) OOP expenditure per ANC visit was US$4.18 (US$4.19), and the mean (SD) OOP expenditure for total ANC was US$57.74 (US$80.96). Pregnant women who used only free government health services also spent 28% and 14% of OOP expenditure on medicines and laboratory investigations. Household income (P<.001), household expenditure (P<.1), used health care mode (P<.05), maternal morbidities (P<.05), and the number of previous pregnancies (P<.1) were the statistically significant independent predictors of OOP expenditure. OOP expenditure per visit for ANC equals half of the daily household expenditure. CONCLUSION: Despite having freely available government health facilities, most pregnant women tend to use both government and private health facilities and incur higher OOP expenditure. Free government health care users also incur a direct medical OOP expenditure for medicines and laboratory investigations. Monthly household income, expenditure, used health care mode, maternal morbidities, and the number of previous pregnancies are independent predictors of OOP expenditure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10615247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Global Health: Science and Practice |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106152472023-10-31 Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka Gunarathna, Sajan Praveena Wickramasinghe, Nuwan Darshana Agampodi, Thilini Chanchala Prasanna, Indika Ruwan Agampodi, Suneth Buddhika Glob Health Sci Pract Original Article INTRODUCTION: Global evidence suggests that high out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure negatively affects health service utilization and creates an economic burden on households during pregnancy. This study aimed to estimate the magnitude and associated factors of OOP expenditure for antenatal care (ANC) in a rural Sri Lankan setting by following up with a large pregnancy cohort (The Rajarata Pregnancy Cohort [RaPCo]) in Anuradhapura District, Sri Lanka. METHODS: Data were collected from July 2019 to May 2020. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect socioeconomic data and OOP expenditures in the first trimester. Self-administered questionnaires were used monthly to collect OOP expenditures in the second and third trimesters. In-depth financial information of 1,558 pregnant women was analyzed using descriptive statistics, nonparametric statistics, and a multiple linear regression model. RESULTS: The majority of participants used both government and private health facilities for ANC. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) OOP expenditure per ANC visit was US$4.18 (US$4.19), and the mean (SD) OOP expenditure for total ANC was US$57.74 (US$80.96). Pregnant women who used only free government health services also spent 28% and 14% of OOP expenditure on medicines and laboratory investigations. Household income (P<.001), household expenditure (P<.1), used health care mode (P<.05), maternal morbidities (P<.05), and the number of previous pregnancies (P<.1) were the statistically significant independent predictors of OOP expenditure. OOP expenditure per visit for ANC equals half of the daily household expenditure. CONCLUSION: Despite having freely available government health facilities, most pregnant women tend to use both government and private health facilities and incur higher OOP expenditure. Free government health care users also incur a direct medical OOP expenditure for medicines and laboratory investigations. Monthly household income, expenditure, used health care mode, maternal morbidities, and the number of previous pregnancies are independent predictors of OOP expenditure. Global Health: Science and Practice 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10615247/ /pubmed/37903576 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00410 Text en © Gunarathna et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00410 |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gunarathna, Sajan Praveena Wickramasinghe, Nuwan Darshana Agampodi, Thilini Chanchala Prasanna, Indika Ruwan Agampodi, Suneth Buddhika Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka |
title | Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka |
title_full | Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka |
title_fullStr | Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka |
title_full_unstemmed | Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka |
title_short | Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka |
title_sort | out-of-pocket expenditure for antenatal care amid free health care provision: evidence from a large pregnancy cohort in rural sri lanka |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37903576 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00410 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gunarathnasajanpraveena outofpocketexpenditureforantenatalcareamidfreehealthcareprovisionevidencefromalargepregnancycohortinruralsrilanka AT wickramasinghenuwandarshana outofpocketexpenditureforantenatalcareamidfreehealthcareprovisionevidencefromalargepregnancycohortinruralsrilanka AT agampodithilinichanchala outofpocketexpenditureforantenatalcareamidfreehealthcareprovisionevidencefromalargepregnancycohortinruralsrilanka AT prasannaindikaruwan outofpocketexpenditureforantenatalcareamidfreehealthcareprovisionevidencefromalargepregnancycohortinruralsrilanka AT agampodisunethbuddhika outofpocketexpenditureforantenatalcareamidfreehealthcareprovisionevidencefromalargepregnancycohortinruralsrilanka |