Cargando…

Repetitive sensorimotor mu-alpha phase-targeted afferent stimulation produces no phase-dependent plasticity related changes in somatosensory evoked potentials or sensory thresholds

Phase-dependent plasticity has been proposed as a neurobiological mechanism by which oscillatory phase-amplitude cross-frequency coupling mediates memory process in the brain. Mimicking this mechanism, real-time EEG oscillatory phase-triggered transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has successfully...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pillen, Steven, Shulga, Anastasia, Zrenner, Christoph, Ziemann, Ulf, Bergmann, Til Ole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37903116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293546
_version_ 1785129184154091520
author Pillen, Steven
Shulga, Anastasia
Zrenner, Christoph
Ziemann, Ulf
Bergmann, Til Ole
author_facet Pillen, Steven
Shulga, Anastasia
Zrenner, Christoph
Ziemann, Ulf
Bergmann, Til Ole
author_sort Pillen, Steven
collection PubMed
description Phase-dependent plasticity has been proposed as a neurobiological mechanism by which oscillatory phase-amplitude cross-frequency coupling mediates memory process in the brain. Mimicking this mechanism, real-time EEG oscillatory phase-triggered transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has successfully induced LTP-like changes in corticospinal excitability in the human motor cortex. Here we asked whether EEG phase-triggered afferent stimulation alone, if repetitively applied to the peaks, troughs, or random phases of the sensorimotor mu-alpha rhythm, would be sufficient to modulate the strength of thalamocortical synapses as assessed by changes in somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) N20 and P25 amplitudes and sensory thresholds (ST). Specifically, we applied 100 Hz triplets of peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) to the thumb, middle, and little finger of the right hand in pseudorandomized trials, with the afferent input from each finger repetitively and consistently arriving either during the cortical mu-alpha trough or peak or at random phases. No significant changes in SEP amplitudes or ST were observed across the phase-dependent PES intervention. We discuss potential limitations of the study and argue that suboptimal stimulation parameter choices rather than a general lack of phase-dependent plasticity in thalamocortical synapses are responsible for this null finding. Future studies should further explore the possibility of phase-dependent sensory stimulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10615264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106152642023-10-31 Repetitive sensorimotor mu-alpha phase-targeted afferent stimulation produces no phase-dependent plasticity related changes in somatosensory evoked potentials or sensory thresholds Pillen, Steven Shulga, Anastasia Zrenner, Christoph Ziemann, Ulf Bergmann, Til Ole PLoS One Research Article Phase-dependent plasticity has been proposed as a neurobiological mechanism by which oscillatory phase-amplitude cross-frequency coupling mediates memory process in the brain. Mimicking this mechanism, real-time EEG oscillatory phase-triggered transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has successfully induced LTP-like changes in corticospinal excitability in the human motor cortex. Here we asked whether EEG phase-triggered afferent stimulation alone, if repetitively applied to the peaks, troughs, or random phases of the sensorimotor mu-alpha rhythm, would be sufficient to modulate the strength of thalamocortical synapses as assessed by changes in somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) N20 and P25 amplitudes and sensory thresholds (ST). Specifically, we applied 100 Hz triplets of peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) to the thumb, middle, and little finger of the right hand in pseudorandomized trials, with the afferent input from each finger repetitively and consistently arriving either during the cortical mu-alpha trough or peak or at random phases. No significant changes in SEP amplitudes or ST were observed across the phase-dependent PES intervention. We discuss potential limitations of the study and argue that suboptimal stimulation parameter choices rather than a general lack of phase-dependent plasticity in thalamocortical synapses are responsible for this null finding. Future studies should further explore the possibility of phase-dependent sensory stimulation. Public Library of Science 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10615264/ /pubmed/37903116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293546 Text en © 2023 Pillen et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pillen, Steven
Shulga, Anastasia
Zrenner, Christoph
Ziemann, Ulf
Bergmann, Til Ole
Repetitive sensorimotor mu-alpha phase-targeted afferent stimulation produces no phase-dependent plasticity related changes in somatosensory evoked potentials or sensory thresholds
title Repetitive sensorimotor mu-alpha phase-targeted afferent stimulation produces no phase-dependent plasticity related changes in somatosensory evoked potentials or sensory thresholds
title_full Repetitive sensorimotor mu-alpha phase-targeted afferent stimulation produces no phase-dependent plasticity related changes in somatosensory evoked potentials or sensory thresholds
title_fullStr Repetitive sensorimotor mu-alpha phase-targeted afferent stimulation produces no phase-dependent plasticity related changes in somatosensory evoked potentials or sensory thresholds
title_full_unstemmed Repetitive sensorimotor mu-alpha phase-targeted afferent stimulation produces no phase-dependent plasticity related changes in somatosensory evoked potentials or sensory thresholds
title_short Repetitive sensorimotor mu-alpha phase-targeted afferent stimulation produces no phase-dependent plasticity related changes in somatosensory evoked potentials or sensory thresholds
title_sort repetitive sensorimotor mu-alpha phase-targeted afferent stimulation produces no phase-dependent plasticity related changes in somatosensory evoked potentials or sensory thresholds
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37903116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293546
work_keys_str_mv AT pillensteven repetitivesensorimotormualphaphasetargetedafferentstimulationproducesnophasedependentplasticityrelatedchangesinsomatosensoryevokedpotentialsorsensorythresholds
AT shulgaanastasia repetitivesensorimotormualphaphasetargetedafferentstimulationproducesnophasedependentplasticityrelatedchangesinsomatosensoryevokedpotentialsorsensorythresholds
AT zrennerchristoph repetitivesensorimotormualphaphasetargetedafferentstimulationproducesnophasedependentplasticityrelatedchangesinsomatosensoryevokedpotentialsorsensorythresholds
AT ziemannulf repetitivesensorimotormualphaphasetargetedafferentstimulationproducesnophasedependentplasticityrelatedchangesinsomatosensoryevokedpotentialsorsensorythresholds
AT bergmanntilole repetitivesensorimotormualphaphasetargetedafferentstimulationproducesnophasedependentplasticityrelatedchangesinsomatosensoryevokedpotentialsorsensorythresholds