Cargando…
Comparison of DNA extraction methods for COVID-19 host genetics studies
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in global shortages in supplies for diagnostic tests, especially in the developing world. Risk factors for COVID-19 severity include pre-existing comorbidities, older age and male sex, but other variables are likely play a role in disease...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37903126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287551 |
_version_ | 1785129194882072576 |
---|---|
author | da Silva, Ronaldo Celerino de Lima, Suelen Cristina dos Santos Reis, Wendell Palôma Maria de Magalhães, Jurandy Júnior Ferraz Magalhães, Ronaldo Nascimento de Oliveira Rathi, Brijesh Kohl, Alain Bezerra, Marcos André Cavalcanti Pena, Lindomar |
author_facet | da Silva, Ronaldo Celerino de Lima, Suelen Cristina dos Santos Reis, Wendell Palôma Maria de Magalhães, Jurandy Júnior Ferraz Magalhães, Ronaldo Nascimento de Oliveira Rathi, Brijesh Kohl, Alain Bezerra, Marcos André Cavalcanti Pena, Lindomar |
author_sort | da Silva, Ronaldo Celerino |
collection | PubMed |
description | The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in global shortages in supplies for diagnostic tests, especially in the developing world. Risk factors for COVID-19 severity include pre-existing comorbidities, older age and male sex, but other variables are likely play a role in disease outcome. There is indeed increasing evidence that supports the role of host genetics in the predisposition to COVID-19 outcomes. The identification of genetic factors associated with the course of SARS-CoV-2 infections relies on DNA extraction methods. This study compared three DNA extraction methods (Chelex(®)100 resin, phenol-chloroform and the QIAamp DNA extraction kit) for COVID-19 host genetic studies using nasopharyngeal samples from patients. The methods were compared regarding number of required steps for execution, sample handling time, quality and quantity of the extracted material and application in genetic studies. The Chelex(®)100 method was found to be cheapest (33 and 13 times cheaper than the commercial kit and phenol-chloroform, respectively), give the highest DNA yield (306 and 69 times higher than the commercial kit and phenol-chloroform, respectively), with the least handling steps while providing adequate DNA quality for downstream applications. Together, our results show that the Chelex(®)100 resin is an inexpensive, safe, simple, fast, and suitable method for DNA extraction of nasopharyngeal samples from COVID-19 patients for genetics studies. This is particularly relevant in developing countries where cost and handling are critical steps in material processing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10615309 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106153092023-10-31 Comparison of DNA extraction methods for COVID-19 host genetics studies da Silva, Ronaldo Celerino de Lima, Suelen Cristina dos Santos Reis, Wendell Palôma Maria de Magalhães, Jurandy Júnior Ferraz Magalhães, Ronaldo Nascimento de Oliveira Rathi, Brijesh Kohl, Alain Bezerra, Marcos André Cavalcanti Pena, Lindomar PLoS One Research Article The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in global shortages in supplies for diagnostic tests, especially in the developing world. Risk factors for COVID-19 severity include pre-existing comorbidities, older age and male sex, but other variables are likely play a role in disease outcome. There is indeed increasing evidence that supports the role of host genetics in the predisposition to COVID-19 outcomes. The identification of genetic factors associated with the course of SARS-CoV-2 infections relies on DNA extraction methods. This study compared three DNA extraction methods (Chelex(®)100 resin, phenol-chloroform and the QIAamp DNA extraction kit) for COVID-19 host genetic studies using nasopharyngeal samples from patients. The methods were compared regarding number of required steps for execution, sample handling time, quality and quantity of the extracted material and application in genetic studies. The Chelex(®)100 method was found to be cheapest (33 and 13 times cheaper than the commercial kit and phenol-chloroform, respectively), give the highest DNA yield (306 and 69 times higher than the commercial kit and phenol-chloroform, respectively), with the least handling steps while providing adequate DNA quality for downstream applications. Together, our results show that the Chelex(®)100 resin is an inexpensive, safe, simple, fast, and suitable method for DNA extraction of nasopharyngeal samples from COVID-19 patients for genetics studies. This is particularly relevant in developing countries where cost and handling are critical steps in material processing. Public Library of Science 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10615309/ /pubmed/37903126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287551 Text en © 2023 Silva et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article da Silva, Ronaldo Celerino de Lima, Suelen Cristina dos Santos Reis, Wendell Palôma Maria de Magalhães, Jurandy Júnior Ferraz Magalhães, Ronaldo Nascimento de Oliveira Rathi, Brijesh Kohl, Alain Bezerra, Marcos André Cavalcanti Pena, Lindomar Comparison of DNA extraction methods for COVID-19 host genetics studies |
title | Comparison of DNA extraction methods for COVID-19 host genetics studies |
title_full | Comparison of DNA extraction methods for COVID-19 host genetics studies |
title_fullStr | Comparison of DNA extraction methods for COVID-19 host genetics studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of DNA extraction methods for COVID-19 host genetics studies |
title_short | Comparison of DNA extraction methods for COVID-19 host genetics studies |
title_sort | comparison of dna extraction methods for covid-19 host genetics studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37903126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287551 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dasilvaronaldocelerino comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsforcovid19hostgeneticsstudies AT delimasuelencristina comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsforcovid19hostgeneticsstudies AT dossantosreiswendellpalomamaria comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsforcovid19hostgeneticsstudies AT demagalhaesjurandyjuniorferraz comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsforcovid19hostgeneticsstudies AT magalhaesronaldonascimentodeoliveira comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsforcovid19hostgeneticsstudies AT rathibrijesh comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsforcovid19hostgeneticsstudies AT kohlalain comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsforcovid19hostgeneticsstudies AT bezerramarcosandrecavalcanti comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsforcovid19hostgeneticsstudies AT penalindomar comparisonofdnaextractionmethodsforcovid19hostgeneticsstudies |