Cargando…

Application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no gold standard for monitoring noxious stimulation during surgery, and the surgical pleth index (SPI) is only one of many monitoring methods. It is commonly used in the monitoring of conventional opiate anesthesia, but its effectiveness in opioid-free anesthesia (OFA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Jingwei, Wu, Duozhi, Cui, Xiaoguang, Li, Shanliang, Xu, Fengmei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37904423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035172
_version_ 1785129217813381120
author Dai, Jingwei
Wu, Duozhi
Cui, Xiaoguang
Li, Shanliang
Xu, Fengmei
author_facet Dai, Jingwei
Wu, Duozhi
Cui, Xiaoguang
Li, Shanliang
Xu, Fengmei
author_sort Dai, Jingwei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no gold standard for monitoring noxious stimulation during surgery, and the surgical pleth index (SPI) is only one of many monitoring methods. It is commonly used in the monitoring of conventional opiate anesthesia, but its effectiveness in opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) has not been evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to observe the guidance value of the surgical pleth index in opioid-free anesthesia for patients undergoing lower abdominal or pelvic surgery. METHODS: A total of 122 patients who underwent lower abdominal or pelvic surgery in our hospital between March 2021 and July 2022 were selected and equally divided into OFA (F) and control (C) groups according to the random number table method. Both groups underwent ultrasound-guided unilateral/bilateral quadratus lumborum block in the supine position according to the surgical field. In group F, 0.50% lidocaine and 0.20% ropivacaine (in 20 mL of 0.9% normal saline) were injected on each side. In group C, 20 mL 0.9% normal saline was injected on each side. Group F received general anesthesia without opioids and group C received general anesthesia with opioids. BP, pulse oxygen saturation, P(ET)CO(2), reactionentropy, stateentropy, and SPI values; Steward score; dosage of propofol, dexmedetomidine, rocuronium, and diltiazem; extubation time; and awake time were monitored in both groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the general data between the 2 groups (P > .05). There were no significant differences in SPI values at T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 or the number of cases requiring additional remifentanil, propofol, and diltiazem between the 2 groups (P > .05). The stateentropy, reactionentropy, and Steward scores were higher in group F than in group C at T4 and T5, while the extubation and awake times were lower in group F than in group C (P < .05). The heart rate and SPI of group F were lower than that of group C at T3 (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The guiding value of SPI in OFA was similar to its use in opiated anesthesia. Its clinical efficacy is exact, vital signs are stable, enabling rapid, and complete regaining of consciousness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10615419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106154192023-10-31 Application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial Dai, Jingwei Wu, Duozhi Cui, Xiaoguang Li, Shanliang Xu, Fengmei Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no gold standard for monitoring noxious stimulation during surgery, and the surgical pleth index (SPI) is only one of many monitoring methods. It is commonly used in the monitoring of conventional opiate anesthesia, but its effectiveness in opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) has not been evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to observe the guidance value of the surgical pleth index in opioid-free anesthesia for patients undergoing lower abdominal or pelvic surgery. METHODS: A total of 122 patients who underwent lower abdominal or pelvic surgery in our hospital between March 2021 and July 2022 were selected and equally divided into OFA (F) and control (C) groups according to the random number table method. Both groups underwent ultrasound-guided unilateral/bilateral quadratus lumborum block in the supine position according to the surgical field. In group F, 0.50% lidocaine and 0.20% ropivacaine (in 20 mL of 0.9% normal saline) were injected on each side. In group C, 20 mL 0.9% normal saline was injected on each side. Group F received general anesthesia without opioids and group C received general anesthesia with opioids. BP, pulse oxygen saturation, P(ET)CO(2), reactionentropy, stateentropy, and SPI values; Steward score; dosage of propofol, dexmedetomidine, rocuronium, and diltiazem; extubation time; and awake time were monitored in both groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the general data between the 2 groups (P > .05). There were no significant differences in SPI values at T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 or the number of cases requiring additional remifentanil, propofol, and diltiazem between the 2 groups (P > .05). The stateentropy, reactionentropy, and Steward scores were higher in group F than in group C at T4 and T5, while the extubation and awake times were lower in group F than in group C (P < .05). The heart rate and SPI of group F were lower than that of group C at T3 (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The guiding value of SPI in OFA was similar to its use in opiated anesthesia. Its clinical efficacy is exact, vital signs are stable, enabling rapid, and complete regaining of consciousness. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10615419/ /pubmed/37904423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035172 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle 3300
Dai, Jingwei
Wu, Duozhi
Cui, Xiaoguang
Li, Shanliang
Xu, Fengmei
Application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
title Application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
topic 3300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37904423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035172
work_keys_str_mv AT daijingwei applicationofsurgicalplethindexintheopioidfreeanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuduozhi applicationofsurgicalplethindexintheopioidfreeanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cuixiaoguang applicationofsurgicalplethindexintheopioidfreeanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lishanliang applicationofsurgicalplethindexintheopioidfreeanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xufengmei applicationofsurgicalplethindexintheopioidfreeanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial