Cargando…
Application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no gold standard for monitoring noxious stimulation during surgery, and the surgical pleth index (SPI) is only one of many monitoring methods. It is commonly used in the monitoring of conventional opiate anesthesia, but its effectiveness in opioid-free anesthesia (OFA...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37904423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035172 |
_version_ | 1785129217813381120 |
---|---|
author | Dai, Jingwei Wu, Duozhi Cui, Xiaoguang Li, Shanliang Xu, Fengmei |
author_facet | Dai, Jingwei Wu, Duozhi Cui, Xiaoguang Li, Shanliang Xu, Fengmei |
author_sort | Dai, Jingwei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no gold standard for monitoring noxious stimulation during surgery, and the surgical pleth index (SPI) is only one of many monitoring methods. It is commonly used in the monitoring of conventional opiate anesthesia, but its effectiveness in opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) has not been evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to observe the guidance value of the surgical pleth index in opioid-free anesthesia for patients undergoing lower abdominal or pelvic surgery. METHODS: A total of 122 patients who underwent lower abdominal or pelvic surgery in our hospital between March 2021 and July 2022 were selected and equally divided into OFA (F) and control (C) groups according to the random number table method. Both groups underwent ultrasound-guided unilateral/bilateral quadratus lumborum block in the supine position according to the surgical field. In group F, 0.50% lidocaine and 0.20% ropivacaine (in 20 mL of 0.9% normal saline) were injected on each side. In group C, 20 mL 0.9% normal saline was injected on each side. Group F received general anesthesia without opioids and group C received general anesthesia with opioids. BP, pulse oxygen saturation, P(ET)CO(2), reactionentropy, stateentropy, and SPI values; Steward score; dosage of propofol, dexmedetomidine, rocuronium, and diltiazem; extubation time; and awake time were monitored in both groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the general data between the 2 groups (P > .05). There were no significant differences in SPI values at T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 or the number of cases requiring additional remifentanil, propofol, and diltiazem between the 2 groups (P > .05). The stateentropy, reactionentropy, and Steward scores were higher in group F than in group C at T4 and T5, while the extubation and awake times were lower in group F than in group C (P < .05). The heart rate and SPI of group F were lower than that of group C at T3 (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The guiding value of SPI in OFA was similar to its use in opiated anesthesia. Its clinical efficacy is exact, vital signs are stable, enabling rapid, and complete regaining of consciousness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10615419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106154192023-10-31 Application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial Dai, Jingwei Wu, Duozhi Cui, Xiaoguang Li, Shanliang Xu, Fengmei Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no gold standard for monitoring noxious stimulation during surgery, and the surgical pleth index (SPI) is only one of many monitoring methods. It is commonly used in the monitoring of conventional opiate anesthesia, but its effectiveness in opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) has not been evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to observe the guidance value of the surgical pleth index in opioid-free anesthesia for patients undergoing lower abdominal or pelvic surgery. METHODS: A total of 122 patients who underwent lower abdominal or pelvic surgery in our hospital between March 2021 and July 2022 were selected and equally divided into OFA (F) and control (C) groups according to the random number table method. Both groups underwent ultrasound-guided unilateral/bilateral quadratus lumborum block in the supine position according to the surgical field. In group F, 0.50% lidocaine and 0.20% ropivacaine (in 20 mL of 0.9% normal saline) were injected on each side. In group C, 20 mL 0.9% normal saline was injected on each side. Group F received general anesthesia without opioids and group C received general anesthesia with opioids. BP, pulse oxygen saturation, P(ET)CO(2), reactionentropy, stateentropy, and SPI values; Steward score; dosage of propofol, dexmedetomidine, rocuronium, and diltiazem; extubation time; and awake time were monitored in both groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the general data between the 2 groups (P > .05). There were no significant differences in SPI values at T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 or the number of cases requiring additional remifentanil, propofol, and diltiazem between the 2 groups (P > .05). The stateentropy, reactionentropy, and Steward scores were higher in group F than in group C at T4 and T5, while the extubation and awake times were lower in group F than in group C (P < .05). The heart rate and SPI of group F were lower than that of group C at T3 (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The guiding value of SPI in OFA was similar to its use in opiated anesthesia. Its clinical efficacy is exact, vital signs are stable, enabling rapid, and complete regaining of consciousness. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10615419/ /pubmed/37904423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035172 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | 3300 Dai, Jingwei Wu, Duozhi Cui, Xiaoguang Li, Shanliang Xu, Fengmei Application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial |
title | Application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | application of surgical pleth index in the opioid-free anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | 3300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37904423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daijingwei applicationofsurgicalplethindexintheopioidfreeanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wuduozhi applicationofsurgicalplethindexintheopioidfreeanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cuixiaoguang applicationofsurgicalplethindexintheopioidfreeanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lishanliang applicationofsurgicalplethindexintheopioidfreeanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT xufengmei applicationofsurgicalplethindexintheopioidfreeanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial |