Cargando…

Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve

BACKGROUND: A program of gasless laparoscopy (GL) has been implemented in rural North-East India. To facilitate safe adoption, participating rural surgeons underwent rigorous training prior to independent clinical practice. An online registry was established to capture clinical data on safety and ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aruparayil, N., Gnanaraj, J., Mishra, A., Bains, L., Corrigan, N., Brown, J., Ensor, T., King, R., Shinkins, B., Jayne, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10392-4
_version_ 1785129286564315136
author Aruparayil, N.
Gnanaraj, J.
Mishra, A.
Bains, L.
Corrigan, N.
Brown, J.
Ensor, T.
King, R.
Shinkins, B.
Jayne, D.
author_facet Aruparayil, N.
Gnanaraj, J.
Mishra, A.
Bains, L.
Corrigan, N.
Brown, J.
Ensor, T.
King, R.
Shinkins, B.
Jayne, D.
author_sort Aruparayil, N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A program of gasless laparoscopy (GL) has been implemented in rural North-East India. To facilitate safe adoption, participating rural surgeons underwent rigorous training prior to independent clinical practice. An online registry was established to capture clinical data on safety and efficacy and to evaluate initial learning curves for gasless laparoscopy. METHODS: Surgeons who had completed the GL training program participated in the online RedCap Registry. Patients included in the registry provided informed consent for the use of their data. Data on operative times, conversion rates, perioperative complications, length of stay, and hospital costs were collected. Fixed reference cumulative sum (CUSUM) model was used to evaluate the learning curve based on operative times and conversion rates published in the literature. RESULTS: Four surgeons from three rural hospitals in North-East India participated in the registry. The data were collected over 12 months, from September 2019 to August 2020. One hundred and twenty-three participants underwent GL procedures, including 109 females (88.6%) and 14 males. GL procedures included cholecystectomy, appendicectomy, tubal ligation, ovarian cystectomy, diagnostic laparoscopy, and adhesiolysis. The mean operative time was 75.3 (42.05) minutes for all the surgeries. Conversion from GL to open surgery occurred in 11.4% of participants, with 8.9% converted to conventional laparoscopy. The main reasons for conversion were the inability to secure an operative view, lack of operating space, and adhesions. The mean length of stay was 3 (2.1) days. The complication rate was 5.7%, with one postoperative death. The CUSUM analysis for GL cholecystectomy showed a longer learning curve for operative time and few conversions. The learning curve for GL tubal ligation was relatively shorter. CONCLUSION: Gasless laparoscopy can be safely implemented in the rural settings of Northeast India with appropriate training programs. Careful case selection is essential during the early stages of the surgical learning curve. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-10392-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10615921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106159212023-11-01 Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve Aruparayil, N. Gnanaraj, J. Mishra, A. Bains, L. Corrigan, N. Brown, J. Ensor, T. King, R. Shinkins, B. Jayne, D. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: A program of gasless laparoscopy (GL) has been implemented in rural North-East India. To facilitate safe adoption, participating rural surgeons underwent rigorous training prior to independent clinical practice. An online registry was established to capture clinical data on safety and efficacy and to evaluate initial learning curves for gasless laparoscopy. METHODS: Surgeons who had completed the GL training program participated in the online RedCap Registry. Patients included in the registry provided informed consent for the use of their data. Data on operative times, conversion rates, perioperative complications, length of stay, and hospital costs were collected. Fixed reference cumulative sum (CUSUM) model was used to evaluate the learning curve based on operative times and conversion rates published in the literature. RESULTS: Four surgeons from three rural hospitals in North-East India participated in the registry. The data were collected over 12 months, from September 2019 to August 2020. One hundred and twenty-three participants underwent GL procedures, including 109 females (88.6%) and 14 males. GL procedures included cholecystectomy, appendicectomy, tubal ligation, ovarian cystectomy, diagnostic laparoscopy, and adhesiolysis. The mean operative time was 75.3 (42.05) minutes for all the surgeries. Conversion from GL to open surgery occurred in 11.4% of participants, with 8.9% converted to conventional laparoscopy. The main reasons for conversion were the inability to secure an operative view, lack of operating space, and adhesions. The mean length of stay was 3 (2.1) days. The complication rate was 5.7%, with one postoperative death. The CUSUM analysis for GL cholecystectomy showed a longer learning curve for operative time and few conversions. The learning curve for GL tubal ligation was relatively shorter. CONCLUSION: Gasless laparoscopy can be safely implemented in the rural settings of Northeast India with appropriate training programs. Careful case selection is essential during the early stages of the surgical learning curve. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-10392-4. Springer US 2023-08-31 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10615921/ /pubmed/37653156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10392-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Aruparayil, N.
Gnanaraj, J.
Mishra, A.
Bains, L.
Corrigan, N.
Brown, J.
Ensor, T.
King, R.
Shinkins, B.
Jayne, D.
Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve
title Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve
title_full Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve
title_fullStr Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve
title_full_unstemmed Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve
title_short Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve
title_sort gasless laparoscopy in rural india-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10392-4
work_keys_str_mv AT aruparayiln gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve
AT gnanarajj gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve
AT mishraa gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve
AT bainsl gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve
AT corrigann gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve
AT brownj gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve
AT ensort gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve
AT kingr gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve
AT shinkinsb gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve
AT jayned gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve