Cargando…
Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve
BACKGROUND: A program of gasless laparoscopy (GL) has been implemented in rural North-East India. To facilitate safe adoption, participating rural surgeons underwent rigorous training prior to independent clinical practice. An online registry was established to capture clinical data on safety and ef...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10392-4 |
_version_ | 1785129286564315136 |
---|---|
author | Aruparayil, N. Gnanaraj, J. Mishra, A. Bains, L. Corrigan, N. Brown, J. Ensor, T. King, R. Shinkins, B. Jayne, D. |
author_facet | Aruparayil, N. Gnanaraj, J. Mishra, A. Bains, L. Corrigan, N. Brown, J. Ensor, T. King, R. Shinkins, B. Jayne, D. |
author_sort | Aruparayil, N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A program of gasless laparoscopy (GL) has been implemented in rural North-East India. To facilitate safe adoption, participating rural surgeons underwent rigorous training prior to independent clinical practice. An online registry was established to capture clinical data on safety and efficacy and to evaluate initial learning curves for gasless laparoscopy. METHODS: Surgeons who had completed the GL training program participated in the online RedCap Registry. Patients included in the registry provided informed consent for the use of their data. Data on operative times, conversion rates, perioperative complications, length of stay, and hospital costs were collected. Fixed reference cumulative sum (CUSUM) model was used to evaluate the learning curve based on operative times and conversion rates published in the literature. RESULTS: Four surgeons from three rural hospitals in North-East India participated in the registry. The data were collected over 12 months, from September 2019 to August 2020. One hundred and twenty-three participants underwent GL procedures, including 109 females (88.6%) and 14 males. GL procedures included cholecystectomy, appendicectomy, tubal ligation, ovarian cystectomy, diagnostic laparoscopy, and adhesiolysis. The mean operative time was 75.3 (42.05) minutes for all the surgeries. Conversion from GL to open surgery occurred in 11.4% of participants, with 8.9% converted to conventional laparoscopy. The main reasons for conversion were the inability to secure an operative view, lack of operating space, and adhesions. The mean length of stay was 3 (2.1) days. The complication rate was 5.7%, with one postoperative death. The CUSUM analysis for GL cholecystectomy showed a longer learning curve for operative time and few conversions. The learning curve for GL tubal ligation was relatively shorter. CONCLUSION: Gasless laparoscopy can be safely implemented in the rural settings of Northeast India with appropriate training programs. Careful case selection is essential during the early stages of the surgical learning curve. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-10392-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10615921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106159212023-11-01 Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve Aruparayil, N. Gnanaraj, J. Mishra, A. Bains, L. Corrigan, N. Brown, J. Ensor, T. King, R. Shinkins, B. Jayne, D. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: A program of gasless laparoscopy (GL) has been implemented in rural North-East India. To facilitate safe adoption, participating rural surgeons underwent rigorous training prior to independent clinical practice. An online registry was established to capture clinical data on safety and efficacy and to evaluate initial learning curves for gasless laparoscopy. METHODS: Surgeons who had completed the GL training program participated in the online RedCap Registry. Patients included in the registry provided informed consent for the use of their data. Data on operative times, conversion rates, perioperative complications, length of stay, and hospital costs were collected. Fixed reference cumulative sum (CUSUM) model was used to evaluate the learning curve based on operative times and conversion rates published in the literature. RESULTS: Four surgeons from three rural hospitals in North-East India participated in the registry. The data were collected over 12 months, from September 2019 to August 2020. One hundred and twenty-three participants underwent GL procedures, including 109 females (88.6%) and 14 males. GL procedures included cholecystectomy, appendicectomy, tubal ligation, ovarian cystectomy, diagnostic laparoscopy, and adhesiolysis. The mean operative time was 75.3 (42.05) minutes for all the surgeries. Conversion from GL to open surgery occurred in 11.4% of participants, with 8.9% converted to conventional laparoscopy. The main reasons for conversion were the inability to secure an operative view, lack of operating space, and adhesions. The mean length of stay was 3 (2.1) days. The complication rate was 5.7%, with one postoperative death. The CUSUM analysis for GL cholecystectomy showed a longer learning curve for operative time and few conversions. The learning curve for GL tubal ligation was relatively shorter. CONCLUSION: Gasless laparoscopy can be safely implemented in the rural settings of Northeast India with appropriate training programs. Careful case selection is essential during the early stages of the surgical learning curve. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-10392-4. Springer US 2023-08-31 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10615921/ /pubmed/37653156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10392-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Aruparayil, N. Gnanaraj, J. Mishra, A. Bains, L. Corrigan, N. Brown, J. Ensor, T. King, R. Shinkins, B. Jayne, D. Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve |
title | Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve |
title_full | Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve |
title_fullStr | Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve |
title_full_unstemmed | Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve |
title_short | Gasless laparoscopy in rural India-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve |
title_sort | gasless laparoscopy in rural india-registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10392-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aruparayiln gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve AT gnanarajj gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve AT mishraa gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve AT bainsl gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve AT corrigann gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve AT brownj gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve AT ensort gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve AT kingr gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve AT shinkinsb gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve AT jayned gaslesslaparoscopyinruralindiaregistryoutcomesandevaluationofthelearningcurve |