Cargando…
Physiological responses and performance factors for double-poling and diagonal-stride treadmill roller-skiing time-trial exercise
PURPOSE: To compare physiological responses between a self-paced 4-min double-poling (DP) time-trial (TT(DP)) versus a 4-min diagonal-stride (DS) time-trial (TT(DS)). The relative importance of peak oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2peak)), anaerobic capacity, and gross efficiency (GE) for proje...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37302104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05239-8 |
_version_ | 1785129298610356224 |
---|---|
author | Andersson, Erik P. Lögdal, Nestor Byrne, Darragh Jones, Thomas W. |
author_facet | Andersson, Erik P. Lögdal, Nestor Byrne, Darragh Jones, Thomas W. |
author_sort | Andersson, Erik P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare physiological responses between a self-paced 4-min double-poling (DP) time-trial (TT(DP)) versus a 4-min diagonal-stride (DS) time-trial (TT(DS)). The relative importance of peak oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2peak)), anaerobic capacity, and gross efficiency (GE) for projection of 4-min TT(DP) and TT(DS) roller-skiing performances were also examined. METHODS: Sixteen highly trained male cross-country skiers performed, in each sub-technique on separate occasions, an 8 × 4-min incremental submaximal protocol, to assess individual metabolic rate (MR) versus power output (PO) relationships, followed by a 10-min passive break and then the TT(DP) or TT(DS), with a randomized order between sub-techniques. RESULTS: In comparison to TT(DS), the TT(DP) resulted in 10 ± 7% lower total MR, 5 ± 4% lower aerobic MR, 30 ± 37% lower anaerobic MR, and 4.7 ± 1.2 percentage points lower GE, which resulted in a 32 ± 4% lower PO (all P < 0.01). The [Formula: see text] O(2peak) and anaerobic capacity were 4 ± 4% and 30 ± 37% lower, respectively, in DP than DS (both P < 0.01). The PO for the two time-trial (TT) performances were not significantly correlated (R(2) = 0.044). Similar parabolic pacing strategies were used during both TTs. Multivariate data analysis projected TT performance using [Formula: see text] O(2peak), anaerobic capacity, and GE (TT(DP), R(2) = 0.974; TT(DS), R(2) = 0.848). The variable influence on projection values for [Formula: see text] O(2peak), anaerobic capacity, and GE were for TT(DP), 1.12 ± 0.60, 1.01 ± 0.72, and 0.83 ± 0.38, respectively, and TT(DS), 1.22 ± 0.35, 0.93 ± 0.44, and 0.75 ± 0.19, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that a cross-country skier’s “metabolic profile” and performance capability are highly sub-technique specific and that 4-min TT performance is differentiated by physiological factors, such as [Formula: see text] O(2peak), anaerobic capacity, and GE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10615977 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106159772023-11-01 Physiological responses and performance factors for double-poling and diagonal-stride treadmill roller-skiing time-trial exercise Andersson, Erik P. Lögdal, Nestor Byrne, Darragh Jones, Thomas W. Eur J Appl Physiol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare physiological responses between a self-paced 4-min double-poling (DP) time-trial (TT(DP)) versus a 4-min diagonal-stride (DS) time-trial (TT(DS)). The relative importance of peak oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2peak)), anaerobic capacity, and gross efficiency (GE) for projection of 4-min TT(DP) and TT(DS) roller-skiing performances were also examined. METHODS: Sixteen highly trained male cross-country skiers performed, in each sub-technique on separate occasions, an 8 × 4-min incremental submaximal protocol, to assess individual metabolic rate (MR) versus power output (PO) relationships, followed by a 10-min passive break and then the TT(DP) or TT(DS), with a randomized order between sub-techniques. RESULTS: In comparison to TT(DS), the TT(DP) resulted in 10 ± 7% lower total MR, 5 ± 4% lower aerobic MR, 30 ± 37% lower anaerobic MR, and 4.7 ± 1.2 percentage points lower GE, which resulted in a 32 ± 4% lower PO (all P < 0.01). The [Formula: see text] O(2peak) and anaerobic capacity were 4 ± 4% and 30 ± 37% lower, respectively, in DP than DS (both P < 0.01). The PO for the two time-trial (TT) performances were not significantly correlated (R(2) = 0.044). Similar parabolic pacing strategies were used during both TTs. Multivariate data analysis projected TT performance using [Formula: see text] O(2peak), anaerobic capacity, and GE (TT(DP), R(2) = 0.974; TT(DS), R(2) = 0.848). The variable influence on projection values for [Formula: see text] O(2peak), anaerobic capacity, and GE were for TT(DP), 1.12 ± 0.60, 1.01 ± 0.72, and 0.83 ± 0.38, respectively, and TT(DS), 1.22 ± 0.35, 0.93 ± 0.44, and 0.75 ± 0.19, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that a cross-country skier’s “metabolic profile” and performance capability are highly sub-technique specific and that 4-min TT performance is differentiated by physiological factors, such as [Formula: see text] O(2peak), anaerobic capacity, and GE. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10615977/ /pubmed/37302104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05239-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Andersson, Erik P. Lögdal, Nestor Byrne, Darragh Jones, Thomas W. Physiological responses and performance factors for double-poling and diagonal-stride treadmill roller-skiing time-trial exercise |
title | Physiological responses and performance factors for double-poling and diagonal-stride treadmill roller-skiing time-trial exercise |
title_full | Physiological responses and performance factors for double-poling and diagonal-stride treadmill roller-skiing time-trial exercise |
title_fullStr | Physiological responses and performance factors for double-poling and diagonal-stride treadmill roller-skiing time-trial exercise |
title_full_unstemmed | Physiological responses and performance factors for double-poling and diagonal-stride treadmill roller-skiing time-trial exercise |
title_short | Physiological responses and performance factors for double-poling and diagonal-stride treadmill roller-skiing time-trial exercise |
title_sort | physiological responses and performance factors for double-poling and diagonal-stride treadmill roller-skiing time-trial exercise |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37302104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05239-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anderssonerikp physiologicalresponsesandperformancefactorsfordoublepolinganddiagonalstridetreadmillrollerskiingtimetrialexercise AT logdalnestor physiologicalresponsesandperformancefactorsfordoublepolinganddiagonalstridetreadmillrollerskiingtimetrialexercise AT byrnedarragh physiologicalresponsesandperformancefactorsfordoublepolinganddiagonalstridetreadmillrollerskiingtimetrialexercise AT jonesthomasw physiologicalresponsesandperformancefactorsfordoublepolinganddiagonalstridetreadmillrollerskiingtimetrialexercise |