Cargando…

Endoscopic therapies for patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a major threat to public health and traditional bariatric surgery continues to have low utilization. Endoscopic treatments for obesity have emerged that offer less risk, but questions remain regarding efficacy, durability, and safety. We compared the efficacy of endoscopic bar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weitzner, Zachary N., Phan, Jennifer, Begashaw, Meron M., Mak, Selene S., Booth, Marika S., Shekelle, Paul G., Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda, Girgis, Mark D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10390-6
_version_ 1785129298855723008
author Weitzner, Zachary N.
Phan, Jennifer
Begashaw, Meron M.
Mak, Selene S.
Booth, Marika S.
Shekelle, Paul G.
Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda
Girgis, Mark D.
author_facet Weitzner, Zachary N.
Phan, Jennifer
Begashaw, Meron M.
Mak, Selene S.
Booth, Marika S.
Shekelle, Paul G.
Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda
Girgis, Mark D.
author_sort Weitzner, Zachary N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obesity is a major threat to public health and traditional bariatric surgery continues to have low utilization. Endoscopic treatments for obesity have emerged that offer less risk, but questions remain regarding efficacy, durability, and safety. We compared the efficacy of endoscopic bariatric procedures as compared to other existing treatments. METHODS: A literature search of Embase, Cochrane Central, and Pubmed was conducted from January 1, 2014 to December 7, 2021, including endoscopic bariatric therapies that were FDA or CE approved at the time of search to non-endoscopic treatments. Thirty-seven studies involving 15,639 patients were included. Primary outcomes included % total body weight loss (%TBWL), % excess body weight loss (%EBWL), and adverse events. Secondary outcomes included quality of life data and differences in hemoglobin A1C levels. Strength of clinical trial and observational data were graded according to the Cochrane methods. RESULTS: Intragastric balloons achieved greater %TBWL with a range of 7.6–14.1% compared to 3.3–6.7% with lifestyle modification at 6 months, and 7.5–14.0% compared to 3.1–7.9%, respectively, at 12 months. When endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) was compared to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), ESG had less %TBWL at 4.7–14.4% compared to 18.8–26.5% after LSG at 6 months, and 4.5–18.6% as compared to 28.4–29.3%, respectively, at 12 months. For the AspireAssist, there was greater %TBWL with aspiration therapy compared to lifestyle modification at 12 months, 12.1–18.3% TBWL versus 3.5–5.9% TBWL, respectively. All endoscopic interventions had higher adverse events rates compared to lifestyle modification. CONCLUSION: This review is the first to evaluate various endoscopic bariatric therapies using only RCTs and observational studies for evaluation of weight loss compared with conservative management, lifestyle modification, and bariatric surgery. Endoscopic therapies result in greater weight loss compared to lifestyle modification, but not as much as bariatric surgery. Endoscopic therapies may be beneficial as an alternative to bariatric surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-10390-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10615978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106159782023-11-01 Endoscopic therapies for patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis Weitzner, Zachary N. Phan, Jennifer Begashaw, Meron M. Mak, Selene S. Booth, Marika S. Shekelle, Paul G. Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda Girgis, Mark D. Surg Endosc Review Article BACKGROUND: Obesity is a major threat to public health and traditional bariatric surgery continues to have low utilization. Endoscopic treatments for obesity have emerged that offer less risk, but questions remain regarding efficacy, durability, and safety. We compared the efficacy of endoscopic bariatric procedures as compared to other existing treatments. METHODS: A literature search of Embase, Cochrane Central, and Pubmed was conducted from January 1, 2014 to December 7, 2021, including endoscopic bariatric therapies that were FDA or CE approved at the time of search to non-endoscopic treatments. Thirty-seven studies involving 15,639 patients were included. Primary outcomes included % total body weight loss (%TBWL), % excess body weight loss (%EBWL), and adverse events. Secondary outcomes included quality of life data and differences in hemoglobin A1C levels. Strength of clinical trial and observational data were graded according to the Cochrane methods. RESULTS: Intragastric balloons achieved greater %TBWL with a range of 7.6–14.1% compared to 3.3–6.7% with lifestyle modification at 6 months, and 7.5–14.0% compared to 3.1–7.9%, respectively, at 12 months. When endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) was compared to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), ESG had less %TBWL at 4.7–14.4% compared to 18.8–26.5% after LSG at 6 months, and 4.5–18.6% as compared to 28.4–29.3%, respectively, at 12 months. For the AspireAssist, there was greater %TBWL with aspiration therapy compared to lifestyle modification at 12 months, 12.1–18.3% TBWL versus 3.5–5.9% TBWL, respectively. All endoscopic interventions had higher adverse events rates compared to lifestyle modification. CONCLUSION: This review is the first to evaluate various endoscopic bariatric therapies using only RCTs and observational studies for evaluation of weight loss compared with conservative management, lifestyle modification, and bariatric surgery. Endoscopic therapies result in greater weight loss compared to lifestyle modification, but not as much as bariatric surgery. Endoscopic therapies may be beneficial as an alternative to bariatric surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-10390-6. Springer US 2023-09-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10615978/ /pubmed/37730854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10390-6 Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Weitzner, Zachary N.
Phan, Jennifer
Begashaw, Meron M.
Mak, Selene S.
Booth, Marika S.
Shekelle, Paul G.
Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda
Girgis, Mark D.
Endoscopic therapies for patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Endoscopic therapies for patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Endoscopic therapies for patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Endoscopic therapies for patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic therapies for patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Endoscopic therapies for patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort endoscopic therapies for patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37730854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10390-6
work_keys_str_mv AT weitznerzacharyn endoscopictherapiesforpatientswithobesityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT phanjennifer endoscopictherapiesforpatientswithobesityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT begashawmeronm endoscopictherapiesforpatientswithobesityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT makselenes endoscopictherapiesforpatientswithobesityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT boothmarikas endoscopictherapiesforpatientswithobesityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shekellepaulg endoscopictherapiesforpatientswithobesityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maggardgibbonsmelinda endoscopictherapiesforpatientswithobesityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT girgismarkd endoscopictherapiesforpatientswithobesityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis