Cargando…

Comparison of the Novel Digital Multi-dimension Botong Score with the Brief Pain Inventory for Evaluating Cancer-Related Pain: A Randomized Crossover Trial

INTRODUCTION: Pain is a common symptom in patients with cancer, and comprehensive assessments of pain are crucial for decision-making of treatment regimens. This study aimed to compare the practicality of the novel digital multi-dimension Botong score (BTS) and the brief pain inventory (BPI) for eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Rong, Fan, Bifa, Luo, Suxia, Wang, Kun, Xie, Guanglun, Wang, Yong, Wang, Jiejun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37603204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00550-w
_version_ 1785129308648374272
author Yan, Rong
Fan, Bifa
Luo, Suxia
Wang, Kun
Xie, Guanglun
Wang, Yong
Wang, Jiejun
author_facet Yan, Rong
Fan, Bifa
Luo, Suxia
Wang, Kun
Xie, Guanglun
Wang, Yong
Wang, Jiejun
author_sort Yan, Rong
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pain is a common symptom in patients with cancer, and comprehensive assessments of pain are crucial for decision-making of treatment regimens. This study aimed to compare the practicality of the novel digital multi-dimension Botong score (BTS) and the brief pain inventory (BPI) for evaluating cancer-related pain. METHODS: This randomized crossover trial enrolled patients with cancer-related pain at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shandong First Medical University between July and December 2022. The participants were randomized 1:1 to BTS evaluation followed by BPI or vice versa. The consistency of BTS and BPI was analyzed, including pain score and the impact of pain on emotions and sleep. The convenience, patient preference, and the filling time of the two tools were compared. The accuracy of BTS in detecting breakthrough pain and neuropathic pain was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients with cancer-related pain were screened and 233 were finally included in the analysis. The Pearson correlation coefficients of pain score for BTS and BPI (4 relevant questions) were 0.583 for the worst pain score within 24 h, 0.394 for the mildest pain score within 24 h, 0.551 for the average pain score within 24 h, and 0.511 for the current pain score, respectively (all P < 0.01), indicating a positive correlation between the BTS and BPI pain scores. BTS was superior to BPI for filling time, convenience, and patient preference (191.03 vs. 256.76, 7.70 vs. 6.78, 7.58 vs. 6.70; all P < 0.01). The accuracy of BTS in detecting breakthrough pain and neuropathic pain was 98.28% and 97.42%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pain scores evaluated by BTS have a positive correlation with those evaluated by BPI. BTS reduces the filling time, is more convenient to use, and is more favored by patients. In addition, BTS could help identify breakthrough pain and neuropathic pain. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR220062624.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10616054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106160542023-11-01 Comparison of the Novel Digital Multi-dimension Botong Score with the Brief Pain Inventory for Evaluating Cancer-Related Pain: A Randomized Crossover Trial Yan, Rong Fan, Bifa Luo, Suxia Wang, Kun Xie, Guanglun Wang, Yong Wang, Jiejun Pain Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Pain is a common symptom in patients with cancer, and comprehensive assessments of pain are crucial for decision-making of treatment regimens. This study aimed to compare the practicality of the novel digital multi-dimension Botong score (BTS) and the brief pain inventory (BPI) for evaluating cancer-related pain. METHODS: This randomized crossover trial enrolled patients with cancer-related pain at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shandong First Medical University between July and December 2022. The participants were randomized 1:1 to BTS evaluation followed by BPI or vice versa. The consistency of BTS and BPI was analyzed, including pain score and the impact of pain on emotions and sleep. The convenience, patient preference, and the filling time of the two tools were compared. The accuracy of BTS in detecting breakthrough pain and neuropathic pain was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients with cancer-related pain were screened and 233 were finally included in the analysis. The Pearson correlation coefficients of pain score for BTS and BPI (4 relevant questions) were 0.583 for the worst pain score within 24 h, 0.394 for the mildest pain score within 24 h, 0.551 for the average pain score within 24 h, and 0.511 for the current pain score, respectively (all P < 0.01), indicating a positive correlation between the BTS and BPI pain scores. BTS was superior to BPI for filling time, convenience, and patient preference (191.03 vs. 256.76, 7.70 vs. 6.78, 7.58 vs. 6.70; all P < 0.01). The accuracy of BTS in detecting breakthrough pain and neuropathic pain was 98.28% and 97.42%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pain scores evaluated by BTS have a positive correlation with those evaluated by BPI. BTS reduces the filling time, is more convenient to use, and is more favored by patients. In addition, BTS could help identify breakthrough pain and neuropathic pain. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR220062624. Springer Healthcare 2023-08-21 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10616054/ /pubmed/37603204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00550-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Yan, Rong
Fan, Bifa
Luo, Suxia
Wang, Kun
Xie, Guanglun
Wang, Yong
Wang, Jiejun
Comparison of the Novel Digital Multi-dimension Botong Score with the Brief Pain Inventory for Evaluating Cancer-Related Pain: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title Comparison of the Novel Digital Multi-dimension Botong Score with the Brief Pain Inventory for Evaluating Cancer-Related Pain: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title_full Comparison of the Novel Digital Multi-dimension Botong Score with the Brief Pain Inventory for Evaluating Cancer-Related Pain: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the Novel Digital Multi-dimension Botong Score with the Brief Pain Inventory for Evaluating Cancer-Related Pain: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Novel Digital Multi-dimension Botong Score with the Brief Pain Inventory for Evaluating Cancer-Related Pain: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title_short Comparison of the Novel Digital Multi-dimension Botong Score with the Brief Pain Inventory for Evaluating Cancer-Related Pain: A Randomized Crossover Trial
title_sort comparison of the novel digital multi-dimension botong score with the brief pain inventory for evaluating cancer-related pain: a randomized crossover trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37603204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-023-00550-w
work_keys_str_mv AT yanrong comparisonofthenoveldigitalmultidimensionbotongscorewiththebriefpaininventoryforevaluatingcancerrelatedpainarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT fanbifa comparisonofthenoveldigitalmultidimensionbotongscorewiththebriefpaininventoryforevaluatingcancerrelatedpainarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT luosuxia comparisonofthenoveldigitalmultidimensionbotongscorewiththebriefpaininventoryforevaluatingcancerrelatedpainarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT wangkun comparisonofthenoveldigitalmultidimensionbotongscorewiththebriefpaininventoryforevaluatingcancerrelatedpainarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT xieguanglun comparisonofthenoveldigitalmultidimensionbotongscorewiththebriefpaininventoryforevaluatingcancerrelatedpainarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT wangyong comparisonofthenoveldigitalmultidimensionbotongscorewiththebriefpaininventoryforevaluatingcancerrelatedpainarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT wangjiejun comparisonofthenoveldigitalmultidimensionbotongscorewiththebriefpaininventoryforevaluatingcancerrelatedpainarandomizedcrossovertrial