Cargando…
Inter-placental variability is not a major factor affecting the healing efficiency of amniotic membrane when used for treating chronic non-healing wounds
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cryopreserved amniotic membrane (AM) grafts in chronic wound healing, including the mean percentage of wound closure per one AM application, and to determine whether the healing efficiency differs between AM grafts obtained from different placentas. A ret...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37227562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10561-023-10096-y |
_version_ | 1785129344245432320 |
---|---|
author | Horvath, Vojtech Svobodova, Alzbeta Cabral, Joao Victor Fiala, Radovan Burkert, Jan Stadler, Petr Lindner, Jaroslav Bednar, Jan Zemlickova, Martina Jirsova, Katerina |
author_facet | Horvath, Vojtech Svobodova, Alzbeta Cabral, Joao Victor Fiala, Radovan Burkert, Jan Stadler, Petr Lindner, Jaroslav Bednar, Jan Zemlickova, Martina Jirsova, Katerina |
author_sort | Horvath, Vojtech |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cryopreserved amniotic membrane (AM) grafts in chronic wound healing, including the mean percentage of wound closure per one AM application, and to determine whether the healing efficiency differs between AM grafts obtained from different placentas. A retrospective study analyzing inter-placental differences in healing capacity and mean wound closure after the application of 96 AM grafts prepared from nine placentas. Only the placentas from which the AM grafts were applied to patients suffering from long-lasting non-healing wounds successfully healed by AM treatment were included. The data from the rapidly progressing wound-closure phase (p-phase) were analyzed. The mean efficiency for each placenta, expressed as an average of wound area reduction (%) seven days after the AM application (baseline, 100%), was calculated from at least 10 applications. No statistical difference between the nine placentas’ efficiency was found in the progressive phase of wound healing. The 7-day average wound reduction in particular placentas varied from 5.70 to 20.99% (median from 1.07 to 17.75) of the baseline. The mean percentage of wound surface reduction of all analyzed defects one week after the application of cryopreserved AM graft was 12.17 ± 20.12% (average ± SD). No significant difference in healing capacity was observed between the nine placentas. The data suggest that if there are intra- and inter-placental differences in AM sheets’ healing efficacy, they are overridden by the actual health status of the subject or even the status of its individual wounds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10616215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106162152023-11-01 Inter-placental variability is not a major factor affecting the healing efficiency of amniotic membrane when used for treating chronic non-healing wounds Horvath, Vojtech Svobodova, Alzbeta Cabral, Joao Victor Fiala, Radovan Burkert, Jan Stadler, Petr Lindner, Jaroslav Bednar, Jan Zemlickova, Martina Jirsova, Katerina Cell Tissue Bank Full Length Paper This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cryopreserved amniotic membrane (AM) grafts in chronic wound healing, including the mean percentage of wound closure per one AM application, and to determine whether the healing efficiency differs between AM grafts obtained from different placentas. A retrospective study analyzing inter-placental differences in healing capacity and mean wound closure after the application of 96 AM grafts prepared from nine placentas. Only the placentas from which the AM grafts were applied to patients suffering from long-lasting non-healing wounds successfully healed by AM treatment were included. The data from the rapidly progressing wound-closure phase (p-phase) were analyzed. The mean efficiency for each placenta, expressed as an average of wound area reduction (%) seven days after the AM application (baseline, 100%), was calculated from at least 10 applications. No statistical difference between the nine placentas’ efficiency was found in the progressive phase of wound healing. The 7-day average wound reduction in particular placentas varied from 5.70 to 20.99% (median from 1.07 to 17.75) of the baseline. The mean percentage of wound surface reduction of all analyzed defects one week after the application of cryopreserved AM graft was 12.17 ± 20.12% (average ± SD). No significant difference in healing capacity was observed between the nine placentas. The data suggest that if there are intra- and inter-placental differences in AM sheets’ healing efficacy, they are overridden by the actual health status of the subject or even the status of its individual wounds. Springer Netherlands 2023-05-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10616215/ /pubmed/37227562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10561-023-10096-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Full Length Paper Horvath, Vojtech Svobodova, Alzbeta Cabral, Joao Victor Fiala, Radovan Burkert, Jan Stadler, Petr Lindner, Jaroslav Bednar, Jan Zemlickova, Martina Jirsova, Katerina Inter-placental variability is not a major factor affecting the healing efficiency of amniotic membrane when used for treating chronic non-healing wounds |
title | Inter-placental variability is not a major factor affecting the healing efficiency of amniotic membrane when used for treating chronic non-healing wounds |
title_full | Inter-placental variability is not a major factor affecting the healing efficiency of amniotic membrane when used for treating chronic non-healing wounds |
title_fullStr | Inter-placental variability is not a major factor affecting the healing efficiency of amniotic membrane when used for treating chronic non-healing wounds |
title_full_unstemmed | Inter-placental variability is not a major factor affecting the healing efficiency of amniotic membrane when used for treating chronic non-healing wounds |
title_short | Inter-placental variability is not a major factor affecting the healing efficiency of amniotic membrane when used for treating chronic non-healing wounds |
title_sort | inter-placental variability is not a major factor affecting the healing efficiency of amniotic membrane when used for treating chronic non-healing wounds |
topic | Full Length Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37227562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10561-023-10096-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horvathvojtech interplacentalvariabilityisnotamajorfactoraffectingthehealingefficiencyofamnioticmembranewhenusedfortreatingchronicnonhealingwounds AT svobodovaalzbeta interplacentalvariabilityisnotamajorfactoraffectingthehealingefficiencyofamnioticmembranewhenusedfortreatingchronicnonhealingwounds AT cabraljoaovictor interplacentalvariabilityisnotamajorfactoraffectingthehealingefficiencyofamnioticmembranewhenusedfortreatingchronicnonhealingwounds AT fialaradovan interplacentalvariabilityisnotamajorfactoraffectingthehealingefficiencyofamnioticmembranewhenusedfortreatingchronicnonhealingwounds AT burkertjan interplacentalvariabilityisnotamajorfactoraffectingthehealingefficiencyofamnioticmembranewhenusedfortreatingchronicnonhealingwounds AT stadlerpetr interplacentalvariabilityisnotamajorfactoraffectingthehealingefficiencyofamnioticmembranewhenusedfortreatingchronicnonhealingwounds AT lindnerjaroslav interplacentalvariabilityisnotamajorfactoraffectingthehealingefficiencyofamnioticmembranewhenusedfortreatingchronicnonhealingwounds AT bednarjan interplacentalvariabilityisnotamajorfactoraffectingthehealingefficiencyofamnioticmembranewhenusedfortreatingchronicnonhealingwounds AT zemlickovamartina interplacentalvariabilityisnotamajorfactoraffectingthehealingefficiencyofamnioticmembranewhenusedfortreatingchronicnonhealingwounds AT jirsovakaterina interplacentalvariabilityisnotamajorfactoraffectingthehealingefficiencyofamnioticmembranewhenusedfortreatingchronicnonhealingwounds |