Cargando…

Is older still good, or even better? Evaluation of possibility of using Miller laryngoscope for intubation in adults and comparison with the most widely used Macintosh laryngoscope. Protocol of a crossover randomized control trial

BACKGROUND: Macintosh laryngoscope is the most widely used laryngoscope for intubation. In some patients, e.g. with flaccid, drooping, aplastic epiglottis, usage of this laryngoscope, or even videolaryngoscopes, may not provide visualization of a glottis. Elevation of the laryngopharynx, like in int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ratajczyk, Paweł, Wasiak, Krzysztof, Kluj, Przemysław, Szmyd, Bartosz, Castillo-Monzón, Caridad G., Gaszyński, Tomasz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37916087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21127
_version_ 1785129368072224768
author Ratajczyk, Paweł
Wasiak, Krzysztof
Kluj, Przemysław
Szmyd, Bartosz
Castillo-Monzón, Caridad G.
Gaszyński, Tomasz
author_facet Ratajczyk, Paweł
Wasiak, Krzysztof
Kluj, Przemysław
Szmyd, Bartosz
Castillo-Monzón, Caridad G.
Gaszyński, Tomasz
author_sort Ratajczyk, Paweł
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Macintosh laryngoscope is the most widely used laryngoscope for intubation. In some patients, e.g. with flaccid, drooping, aplastic epiglottis, usage of this laryngoscope, or even videolaryngoscopes, may not provide visualization of a glottis. Elevation of the laryngopharynx, like in intubation with Miller laryngoscope, may significantly improve intubating conditions. METHODS: An anaesthesiologist with over 20 years of experience will perform direct laryngoscopy with randomly chosen Miller or Macintosh blade, evaluating the visibility of rima glottidis with Cormack-Lehane classification and POGO score with and without external laryngeal pressure. Then the second evaluation of glottis with other blade type will be obtained and the patient will be intubated. Comparison of the rima glottidis visibility when using both blades will be the primary endpoint of the study. The secondary endpoints consist of: demonstrating whether there is a group of adult patients in whom the use of the Miller blade associated with better vocal cord visibility may be predicted based on an anesthesiological examination, and whether external laryngeal pressure improves vocal cord visualization more when using the Miller blade compared with the Macintosh blade. SAMPLE SIZE: We performed minimal sample size calculations based on the data derived from the first 60 patients. We assessed the minimal sample size to obtain the alpha of 5 % and power of 90 %. We decide to enroll at least 286 patients. DISCUSSION: this will be the first trial assessing Miller and Macintosh blades in the same population of adult patients. It will determine group of patients in whom Miller laryngoscope will provide better visualization of rima glottidis than Macintosh blade and associated technique, diminishing rate of prolonging intubations and reducing possible aftermaths of hypoxia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10616315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106163152023-11-01 Is older still good, or even better? Evaluation of possibility of using Miller laryngoscope for intubation in adults and comparison with the most widely used Macintosh laryngoscope. Protocol of a crossover randomized control trial Ratajczyk, Paweł Wasiak, Krzysztof Kluj, Przemysław Szmyd, Bartosz Castillo-Monzón, Caridad G. Gaszyński, Tomasz Heliyon Research Article BACKGROUND: Macintosh laryngoscope is the most widely used laryngoscope for intubation. In some patients, e.g. with flaccid, drooping, aplastic epiglottis, usage of this laryngoscope, or even videolaryngoscopes, may not provide visualization of a glottis. Elevation of the laryngopharynx, like in intubation with Miller laryngoscope, may significantly improve intubating conditions. METHODS: An anaesthesiologist with over 20 years of experience will perform direct laryngoscopy with randomly chosen Miller or Macintosh blade, evaluating the visibility of rima glottidis with Cormack-Lehane classification and POGO score with and without external laryngeal pressure. Then the second evaluation of glottis with other blade type will be obtained and the patient will be intubated. Comparison of the rima glottidis visibility when using both blades will be the primary endpoint of the study. The secondary endpoints consist of: demonstrating whether there is a group of adult patients in whom the use of the Miller blade associated with better vocal cord visibility may be predicted based on an anesthesiological examination, and whether external laryngeal pressure improves vocal cord visualization more when using the Miller blade compared with the Macintosh blade. SAMPLE SIZE: We performed minimal sample size calculations based on the data derived from the first 60 patients. We assessed the minimal sample size to obtain the alpha of 5 % and power of 90 %. We decide to enroll at least 286 patients. DISCUSSION: this will be the first trial assessing Miller and Macintosh blades in the same population of adult patients. It will determine group of patients in whom Miller laryngoscope will provide better visualization of rima glottidis than Macintosh blade and associated technique, diminishing rate of prolonging intubations and reducing possible aftermaths of hypoxia. Elsevier 2023-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10616315/ /pubmed/37916087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21127 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Ratajczyk, Paweł
Wasiak, Krzysztof
Kluj, Przemysław
Szmyd, Bartosz
Castillo-Monzón, Caridad G.
Gaszyński, Tomasz
Is older still good, or even better? Evaluation of possibility of using Miller laryngoscope for intubation in adults and comparison with the most widely used Macintosh laryngoscope. Protocol of a crossover randomized control trial
title Is older still good, or even better? Evaluation of possibility of using Miller laryngoscope for intubation in adults and comparison with the most widely used Macintosh laryngoscope. Protocol of a crossover randomized control trial
title_full Is older still good, or even better? Evaluation of possibility of using Miller laryngoscope for intubation in adults and comparison with the most widely used Macintosh laryngoscope. Protocol of a crossover randomized control trial
title_fullStr Is older still good, or even better? Evaluation of possibility of using Miller laryngoscope for intubation in adults and comparison with the most widely used Macintosh laryngoscope. Protocol of a crossover randomized control trial
title_full_unstemmed Is older still good, or even better? Evaluation of possibility of using Miller laryngoscope for intubation in adults and comparison with the most widely used Macintosh laryngoscope. Protocol of a crossover randomized control trial
title_short Is older still good, or even better? Evaluation of possibility of using Miller laryngoscope for intubation in adults and comparison with the most widely used Macintosh laryngoscope. Protocol of a crossover randomized control trial
title_sort is older still good, or even better? evaluation of possibility of using miller laryngoscope for intubation in adults and comparison with the most widely used macintosh laryngoscope. protocol of a crossover randomized control trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37916087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21127
work_keys_str_mv AT ratajczykpaweł isolderstillgoodorevenbetterevaluationofpossibilityofusingmillerlaryngoscopeforintubationinadultsandcomparisonwiththemostwidelyusedmacintoshlaryngoscopeprotocolofacrossoverrandomizedcontroltrial
AT wasiakkrzysztof isolderstillgoodorevenbetterevaluationofpossibilityofusingmillerlaryngoscopeforintubationinadultsandcomparisonwiththemostwidelyusedmacintoshlaryngoscopeprotocolofacrossoverrandomizedcontroltrial
AT klujprzemysław isolderstillgoodorevenbetterevaluationofpossibilityofusingmillerlaryngoscopeforintubationinadultsandcomparisonwiththemostwidelyusedmacintoshlaryngoscopeprotocolofacrossoverrandomizedcontroltrial
AT szmydbartosz isolderstillgoodorevenbetterevaluationofpossibilityofusingmillerlaryngoscopeforintubationinadultsandcomparisonwiththemostwidelyusedmacintoshlaryngoscopeprotocolofacrossoverrandomizedcontroltrial
AT castillomonzoncaridadg isolderstillgoodorevenbetterevaluationofpossibilityofusingmillerlaryngoscopeforintubationinadultsandcomparisonwiththemostwidelyusedmacintoshlaryngoscopeprotocolofacrossoverrandomizedcontroltrial
AT gaszynskitomasz isolderstillgoodorevenbetterevaluationofpossibilityofusingmillerlaryngoscopeforintubationinadultsandcomparisonwiththemostwidelyusedmacintoshlaryngoscopeprotocolofacrossoverrandomizedcontroltrial