Cargando…

Utility of routine type and cross for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective review

BACKGROUND: Preoperative type and screen and type and cross are routinely obtained in patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgeries. This is despite low perioperative transfusion rates, particularly in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: We conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russell, Nicole, Al-Adli, Nadeem, Shank, Christopher, Carey, Shannon, Ajayi, Olaide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100280
_version_ 1785129381187813376
author Russell, Nicole
Al-Adli, Nadeem
Shank, Christopher
Carey, Shannon
Ajayi, Olaide
author_facet Russell, Nicole
Al-Adli, Nadeem
Shank, Christopher
Carey, Shannon
Ajayi, Olaide
author_sort Russell, Nicole
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preoperative type and screen and type and cross are routinely obtained in patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgeries. This is despite low perioperative transfusion rates, particularly in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary medical center of all patients 18 years of age or older undergoing elective ACDF for degenerative cervical spine disease between January 2016 and January 2021. Our primary outcome measures included the frequency of type and screen/crossmatch orders, rate of perioperative transfusion, and crossmatch to transfusion (C/T) ratio. Secondary outcomes included differences between preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit. RESULTS: In total, 1,162 patients were identified. There were no cases of intraoperative transfusion. The overall transfusion rate was less than 1%, with only 1 patient receiving a blood product transfusion during their hospital admission. This patient received 2 units of platelets for severe preoperative thrombocytopenia. Yet, 961 patients (83%) received ABO/Rh blood typing and screening and 647 patients (56%) had their blood typed and crossed. A total of 1,318 units of blood were crossmatched, with no units of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) transfused and only 2 units of platelets transfused, achieving a high crossmatch to transfusion (C/T) ratio of 659:1. CONCLUSIONS: Among 1,162 patients who underwent elective ACDF at our institution, there were no patients who required an intraoperative or emergent blood transfusion. Furthermore, routine type and screen and crossmatch in patients undergoing elective ACDF at our insitution is associated with a high C/T ratio, suggestive of inefficient usage of blood products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10616372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106163722023-11-01 Utility of routine type and cross for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective review Russell, Nicole Al-Adli, Nadeem Shank, Christopher Carey, Shannon Ajayi, Olaide N Am Spine Soc J Clinical Studies BACKGROUND: Preoperative type and screen and type and cross are routinely obtained in patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgeries. This is despite low perioperative transfusion rates, particularly in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary medical center of all patients 18 years of age or older undergoing elective ACDF for degenerative cervical spine disease between January 2016 and January 2021. Our primary outcome measures included the frequency of type and screen/crossmatch orders, rate of perioperative transfusion, and crossmatch to transfusion (C/T) ratio. Secondary outcomes included differences between preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit. RESULTS: In total, 1,162 patients were identified. There were no cases of intraoperative transfusion. The overall transfusion rate was less than 1%, with only 1 patient receiving a blood product transfusion during their hospital admission. This patient received 2 units of platelets for severe preoperative thrombocytopenia. Yet, 961 patients (83%) received ABO/Rh blood typing and screening and 647 patients (56%) had their blood typed and crossed. A total of 1,318 units of blood were crossmatched, with no units of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) transfused and only 2 units of platelets transfused, achieving a high crossmatch to transfusion (C/T) ratio of 659:1. CONCLUSIONS: Among 1,162 patients who underwent elective ACDF at our institution, there were no patients who required an intraoperative or emergent blood transfusion. Furthermore, routine type and screen and crossmatch in patients undergoing elective ACDF at our insitution is associated with a high C/T ratio, suggestive of inefficient usage of blood products. Elsevier 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10616372/ /pubmed/37915967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100280 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical Studies
Russell, Nicole
Al-Adli, Nadeem
Shank, Christopher
Carey, Shannon
Ajayi, Olaide
Utility of routine type and cross for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective review
title Utility of routine type and cross for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective review
title_full Utility of routine type and cross for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective review
title_fullStr Utility of routine type and cross for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective review
title_full_unstemmed Utility of routine type and cross for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective review
title_short Utility of routine type and cross for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective review
title_sort utility of routine type and cross for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective review
topic Clinical Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100280
work_keys_str_mv AT russellnicole utilityofroutinetypeandcrossforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionaretrospectivereview
AT aladlinadeem utilityofroutinetypeandcrossforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionaretrospectivereview
AT shankchristopher utilityofroutinetypeandcrossforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionaretrospectivereview
AT careyshannon utilityofroutinetypeandcrossforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionaretrospectivereview
AT ajayiolaide utilityofroutinetypeandcrossforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionaretrospectivereview