Cargando…

The centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The mean 4-h dialysate to plasma ratio of creatinine (4-h D/Pcr) is a vital cutoff value for recognizing the fast peritoneal solute transfer rate (PSTR) in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD); however, it shows a noticeable centre effect. We aimed to investigate our centre-calculated cu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Jing, Liu, Ruihua, Peng, Yuan, Yi, Chunyan, Wu, Haishan, Ye, Hongjian, Lin, Jianxiong, Diao, Xiangwen, Huang, Fengxian, Mao, Haiping, Guo, Qunying, Yang, Xiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad197
_version_ 1785129397126168576
author Guo, Jing
Liu, Ruihua
Peng, Yuan
Yi, Chunyan
Wu, Haishan
Ye, Hongjian
Lin, Jianxiong
Diao, Xiangwen
Huang, Fengxian
Mao, Haiping
Guo, Qunying
Yang, Xiao
author_facet Guo, Jing
Liu, Ruihua
Peng, Yuan
Yi, Chunyan
Wu, Haishan
Ye, Hongjian
Lin, Jianxiong
Diao, Xiangwen
Huang, Fengxian
Mao, Haiping
Guo, Qunying
Yang, Xiao
author_sort Guo, Jing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The mean 4-h dialysate to plasma ratio of creatinine (4-h D/Pcr) is a vital cutoff value for recognizing the fast peritoneal solute transfer rate (PSTR) in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD); however, it shows a noticeable centre effect. We aimed to investigate our centre-calculated cutoff value (CCV) of 4-h D/Pcr and compare it with the traditional cutoff value (TCV) (0.65). METHODS: In this study, we enrolled incident PD patients at our centre from 2008 to 2019, and divided them into fast or non-fast PSTR groups according to baseline 4-h D/Pcr–based CCV or TCV. We compared the efficiency of the fast PSTR recognized by two cutoff values in predicting mortality, ultrafiltration (UF) insufficiency and technical survival. RESULTS: In total, 1905 patients were enrolled, with a mean 4-h D/Pcr of 0.71 ± 0.11. Compared with TCV (0.65), CCV (0.71) showed superiority in predicting mortality of PD patients [hazard ratio (HR) 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.59 vs HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.97–1.59]. The odds ratio (OR) of the fast PSTR in centre classification was slightly higher than traditional classification in predicting UF insufficiency (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.25–2.24 vs OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.15–2.22). Additionally, the restricted cubic splines 4-h D/Pcr has an S-shaped association with mortality and UF insufficiency, and the inflection points of 4-h D/Pcr were 0.71 (equal to CCV). CONCLUSIONS: The CCV of 4-h D/Pcr for identifying fast PSTR was 0.71. It was superior to TCV in predicting mortality and UF insufficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10616441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106164412023-11-01 The centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study Guo, Jing Liu, Ruihua Peng, Yuan Yi, Chunyan Wu, Haishan Ye, Hongjian Lin, Jianxiong Diao, Xiangwen Huang, Fengxian Mao, Haiping Guo, Qunying Yang, Xiao Clin Kidney J Original Article BACKGROUND: The mean 4-h dialysate to plasma ratio of creatinine (4-h D/Pcr) is a vital cutoff value for recognizing the fast peritoneal solute transfer rate (PSTR) in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD); however, it shows a noticeable centre effect. We aimed to investigate our centre-calculated cutoff value (CCV) of 4-h D/Pcr and compare it with the traditional cutoff value (TCV) (0.65). METHODS: In this study, we enrolled incident PD patients at our centre from 2008 to 2019, and divided them into fast or non-fast PSTR groups according to baseline 4-h D/Pcr–based CCV or TCV. We compared the efficiency of the fast PSTR recognized by two cutoff values in predicting mortality, ultrafiltration (UF) insufficiency and technical survival. RESULTS: In total, 1905 patients were enrolled, with a mean 4-h D/Pcr of 0.71 ± 0.11. Compared with TCV (0.65), CCV (0.71) showed superiority in predicting mortality of PD patients [hazard ratio (HR) 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.59 vs HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.97–1.59]. The odds ratio (OR) of the fast PSTR in centre classification was slightly higher than traditional classification in predicting UF insufficiency (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.25–2.24 vs OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.15–2.22). Additionally, the restricted cubic splines 4-h D/Pcr has an S-shaped association with mortality and UF insufficiency, and the inflection points of 4-h D/Pcr were 0.71 (equal to CCV). CONCLUSIONS: The CCV of 4-h D/Pcr for identifying fast PSTR was 0.71. It was superior to TCV in predicting mortality and UF insufficiency. Oxford University Press 2023-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10616441/ /pubmed/37915941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad197 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Guo, Jing
Liu, Ruihua
Peng, Yuan
Yi, Chunyan
Wu, Haishan
Ye, Hongjian
Lin, Jianxiong
Diao, Xiangwen
Huang, Fengxian
Mao, Haiping
Guo, Qunying
Yang, Xiao
The centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study
title The centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study
title_full The centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr The centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study
title_short The centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad197
work_keys_str_mv AT guojing thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT liuruihua thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT pengyuan thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT yichunyan thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT wuhaishan thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT yehongjian thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT linjianxiong thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT diaoxiangwen thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT huangfengxian thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT maohaiping thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT guoqunying thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT yangxiao thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT guojing centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT liuruihua centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT pengyuan centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT yichunyan centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT wuhaishan centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT yehongjian centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT linjianxiong centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT diaoxiangwen centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT huangfengxian centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT maohaiping centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT guoqunying centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT yangxiao centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy