Cargando…
The centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: The mean 4-h dialysate to plasma ratio of creatinine (4-h D/Pcr) is a vital cutoff value for recognizing the fast peritoneal solute transfer rate (PSTR) in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD); however, it shows a noticeable centre effect. We aimed to investigate our centre-calculated cu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad197 |
_version_ | 1785129397126168576 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Jing Liu, Ruihua Peng, Yuan Yi, Chunyan Wu, Haishan Ye, Hongjian Lin, Jianxiong Diao, Xiangwen Huang, Fengxian Mao, Haiping Guo, Qunying Yang, Xiao |
author_facet | Guo, Jing Liu, Ruihua Peng, Yuan Yi, Chunyan Wu, Haishan Ye, Hongjian Lin, Jianxiong Diao, Xiangwen Huang, Fengxian Mao, Haiping Guo, Qunying Yang, Xiao |
author_sort | Guo, Jing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The mean 4-h dialysate to plasma ratio of creatinine (4-h D/Pcr) is a vital cutoff value for recognizing the fast peritoneal solute transfer rate (PSTR) in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD); however, it shows a noticeable centre effect. We aimed to investigate our centre-calculated cutoff value (CCV) of 4-h D/Pcr and compare it with the traditional cutoff value (TCV) (0.65). METHODS: In this study, we enrolled incident PD patients at our centre from 2008 to 2019, and divided them into fast or non-fast PSTR groups according to baseline 4-h D/Pcr–based CCV or TCV. We compared the efficiency of the fast PSTR recognized by two cutoff values in predicting mortality, ultrafiltration (UF) insufficiency and technical survival. RESULTS: In total, 1905 patients were enrolled, with a mean 4-h D/Pcr of 0.71 ± 0.11. Compared with TCV (0.65), CCV (0.71) showed superiority in predicting mortality of PD patients [hazard ratio (HR) 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.59 vs HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.97–1.59]. The odds ratio (OR) of the fast PSTR in centre classification was slightly higher than traditional classification in predicting UF insufficiency (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.25–2.24 vs OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.15–2.22). Additionally, the restricted cubic splines 4-h D/Pcr has an S-shaped association with mortality and UF insufficiency, and the inflection points of 4-h D/Pcr were 0.71 (equal to CCV). CONCLUSIONS: The CCV of 4-h D/Pcr for identifying fast PSTR was 0.71. It was superior to TCV in predicting mortality and UF insufficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10616441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106164412023-11-01 The centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study Guo, Jing Liu, Ruihua Peng, Yuan Yi, Chunyan Wu, Haishan Ye, Hongjian Lin, Jianxiong Diao, Xiangwen Huang, Fengxian Mao, Haiping Guo, Qunying Yang, Xiao Clin Kidney J Original Article BACKGROUND: The mean 4-h dialysate to plasma ratio of creatinine (4-h D/Pcr) is a vital cutoff value for recognizing the fast peritoneal solute transfer rate (PSTR) in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD); however, it shows a noticeable centre effect. We aimed to investigate our centre-calculated cutoff value (CCV) of 4-h D/Pcr and compare it with the traditional cutoff value (TCV) (0.65). METHODS: In this study, we enrolled incident PD patients at our centre from 2008 to 2019, and divided them into fast or non-fast PSTR groups according to baseline 4-h D/Pcr–based CCV or TCV. We compared the efficiency of the fast PSTR recognized by two cutoff values in predicting mortality, ultrafiltration (UF) insufficiency and technical survival. RESULTS: In total, 1905 patients were enrolled, with a mean 4-h D/Pcr of 0.71 ± 0.11. Compared with TCV (0.65), CCV (0.71) showed superiority in predicting mortality of PD patients [hazard ratio (HR) 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.59 vs HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.97–1.59]. The odds ratio (OR) of the fast PSTR in centre classification was slightly higher than traditional classification in predicting UF insufficiency (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.25–2.24 vs OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.15–2.22). Additionally, the restricted cubic splines 4-h D/Pcr has an S-shaped association with mortality and UF insufficiency, and the inflection points of 4-h D/Pcr were 0.71 (equal to CCV). CONCLUSIONS: The CCV of 4-h D/Pcr for identifying fast PSTR was 0.71. It was superior to TCV in predicting mortality and UF insufficiency. Oxford University Press 2023-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10616441/ /pubmed/37915941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad197 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Guo, Jing Liu, Ruihua Peng, Yuan Yi, Chunyan Wu, Haishan Ye, Hongjian Lin, Jianxiong Diao, Xiangwen Huang, Fengxian Mao, Haiping Guo, Qunying Yang, Xiao The centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study |
title | The centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | The centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | The centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | The centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | centre-calculated cutoff value is better for identifying fast peritoneal solute transfer of patients on peritoneal dialysis than the traditional value: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10616441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37915941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad197 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guojing thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT liuruihua thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT pengyuan thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT yichunyan thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT wuhaishan thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT yehongjian thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT linjianxiong thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT diaoxiangwen thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT huangfengxian thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT maohaiping thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT guoqunying thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT yangxiao thecentrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT guojing centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT liuruihua centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT pengyuan centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT yichunyan centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT wuhaishan centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT yehongjian centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT linjianxiong centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT diaoxiangwen centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT huangfengxian centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT maohaiping centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT guoqunying centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy AT yangxiao centrecalculatedcutoffvalueisbetterforidentifyingfastperitonealsolutetransferofpatientsonperitonealdialysisthanthetraditionalvaluearetrospectivecohortstudy |